Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

As much as i love my Trust setuo, i think the ball bearing Garret based HKS turbos are newer technology...but thats not to say the Trust turbos dont deliver the goods. Im still yet to see a std RB20 with a 2530 with the response/power of the TD06-20G.

...But, there is always the but, the 2530 makes almost the same power, with similar response all whilst using the std manifold etc etc. I doubt that the bolt on TD06-20G turbos would match a 2530, could be wrong and wait with interest to see the results of someone running one, but the fact that my TD06 uses the manifold and external wastegate i think it helps the overall performance.

From memory, R31nismoids GT30 equipped RB25 sees about 16psi at about 4,000rpm with a tuned length exhaust manifold and all support systems.

The RB25 is 25% larger in capacity than the RB20 so in theory it would see 16psi 25% later in the rev range at approximately 5,000rpm.

So I guess, if funds allowed and you wanted to take that route a GT30 might be a decent match for a no holds barred 9,000rpm RB20.

mine is with the 82 rear housing, with a .63 you'd be limiting power output of the turbo to around 500hp instead of 550/600... but IMO too laggy for the RB20.

you'd need to wring the guts out of it all day to get anywhere.

Oh, and my 24psi isnt on much later than around 4300-4400 where it goes to 8000rpm

just curious as to what the difference is bewteen a garret and HKS gt2530 are

ive seen heaps of hks version but only for gtr/silvia engines, and ive seen heaps of garret version only for rb series engine. can u show my a pic of a HKS gt2530 and NOT a garrett 2530. i just dont want to buy the wrong one

THX

what about a disco??? anyone heard of anyone using one on an rb20? i'm looking for an upgrade but i would like decent low end but an alright output.. i know you can't have the best of both worlds with out some gassy help but i was just curious if anyones tried this combo?!?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!? oh and if you don't know what a disco is its a garrett GT28RS.

Chris

Strange, but extremely well thought out.. The collector is the most important part of a turbo manifold, and positioning the wastegate like this enables a pefectly smooth collector design (ie no funny holes at strange angles that interfere with the gas flow path even when the wastegate is closed)

Ive seen several big HP drag cars with this mod - it works well.

Its perfect - The gasses going out the wastegate have a clear, unimpeded shot stright through the turbine housing.

 

Thats the problem. You dont want the air going straight out the turbine housing. You want the air to go thru the scroll of the housing, spin the turbine then out the exhaust. When there is a a certain amount of pressure in the housing you want the wastegate to open and bleed of airflow/pressure so that the turbine does not continue to accelerate.

Wastegates work on basically back pressure (pressure being theoretically equal against all surfaces) whilst the turbine relies on airflow which is directional...

Thats why my gut feeling is that is not the ideal orientation of the wastegate, but could be wrong...just curious to know why it was done this way?

"Thats the problem. You dont want the air goign straight out the turbine housing."

Well, you actually want part going through the housing and a small part going out the wastegate

"You want the air to go thru the scroll of the houisng, spin the turbine then out the exhaust. When there is a a certain amount of pressure in the housing you want the wastegate to open and bleed of airflow so that the turbine does not continue to accelerate."

Thats right - and to get any semblance of decent boost control, the gasses going through the wastegate need to do it easily. If the wastegate gasses have to turn 90 or 180 degrees to go through the wastegate, then they're going to take the easier path and go through the exhaust housing instead, which will cause overboost.

My above post explains why its been done this way. Im sure when Turbine replies he will back me up.

Sorry not convinced. Pressure isnt directional, and wastegates work to regulate pressure. Air is lazy and will piss out wherever/however it can, just look at what happens when you pop a gasket between the turbo flange and manifold.

I have seen this type of setup before, a few old school rotors/VLs etc, and dont have a problem with a wastegate being welded to the housing (very nice welding by the way), but i would have thought the angle at which it has been welded is not ideal.

Anyway, well will see:)

I guess we can respectfully disagree.

In a properly matached manifold, the gasses are traveling at at local speed of sound. They really dont want to change direction. Pressure may not be directional, but flow certainly is, and thats what we're trying to achieve. Flow..

Its a nice job thats for sure...

One thing - Wastegates work to regulate turbine speed, and boost pressure - not exhaust manifold pressure. The wastegate doesnt care what pressure is in the exhuast manifold - it only knows that it has to bleed off exhaust gasses when a certain amount of boost is present.

PS - I Love your Skyline :)

I guess we can respectfully disagree.  

LOL..yeh no problem:) This is a discussion forum:thumbsup:

In a properly matached manifold, the gasses are traveling at at local speed of sound. They really dont want to change direction. Pressure may not be directional, but flow certainly is, and thats what we're trying to achieve. Flow..

I know about Mach numbers, flow etc:) But i thought you would want flow thru the turbine first and foremost not the wastegate.

One thing - Wastegates work to regulate turbine speed, and boost pressure - not exhaust manifold pressure. The wastegate doesnt care what pressure is in the exhuast manifold - it only knows that it has to bleed off exhaust gasses when a certain amount of boost is present.

If there was not pressure in the exhaust manifold then there wouldnt be a pressure differential for the air to bleed off and control the turbine speed. The rest of it i agree with though.:)

Will wait and see i suppose...and thanks:)

"I know about Mach numbers, flow etc But i thought you would want flow thru the turbine first and foremost not the wastegate."

Cant disagree with that one :)

"If there was not pressure in the exhaust manifold then there wouldnt be a pressure differential for the air to bleed off and control the turbine speed."

I should clarify this - theres definitely pressure in the exhaust manifold, I just wanted to say that wastegates regulate intake manifold pressure, not exhaust manifold pressure..

Anyways, i think ive said enough :)

Cheers,

Matt

PS- nice to know people can still discuss things without resorting to a pissing contest :)

Sorry not convinced. Pressure isnt directional, and wastegates work to regulate pressure. Air is lazy and will piss out wherever/however it can, just look at what happens when you pop a gasket between the turbo flange and manifold.

I have seen this type of setup before, a few old school rotors/VLs etc, and dont have a problem with a wastegate being welded to the housing (very nice welding by the way), but i would have thought the angle at which it has been welded is not ideal.

Anyway, well will see:)

Roy, I know you like this mod, but air is not lazy, It's a powerfull mother of a thing wich if controlled properly can be used to develope big horsepower. The air at speed becomes like a solid and will not turn corners in a hurry at high speed.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ok i will get those 310mm. I found one but on a different site. This is the description on those...is it ok? Technical parameters: - Axle: front. - Disc type: ventilated. - Number of holes: 5. - Disc diameter: 310mm. - Total height with center: 54mm. - Thickness (new/min.): 30/28mm. - Designed for brake calipers manufacturer: Sumitomo.
    • You Gregged a whole racetrack!?
    • Look for broken wire or bad connector at the motor. Might not be it, but is worth starting there, as it is easy.
    • Hi everyone, I’m having an issue with my R32 GT-R. Sometimes, when the car goes over a bump or experiences some vibration, the 4WD warning light comes on the dashboard. When I check the code from the control unit in the trunk, it shows Code 19 – ETS Motor. However, everything seems to be working fine — if I turn off the engine and restart the car, the light goes away and everything functions normally. Has anyone experienced this before? Where should I start troubleshooting this issue? Thanks in advance!
    • I'm back from the dyno - again! I went looking for someone who knew LS's and had a roller dyno, to see how it shaped up compared to everything else and confirm the powerband really is peaking where Mr Mamo says it should. TLDR: The dyno result I got this time definitely had the shape of how it feels on the road and finally 'makes sense'. Also we had a bit more time to play with timing on the dyno, it turns out the common practice in LS is to lower the timing around peak torque and restore it to max after. So given a car was on the dyno and mostly dialled in already, it was time for tweaking. Luis at APS is definitely knowledgable when it came to this and had overlays ready to go and was happy to share. If you map out your cylinder airmass you start seeing graphs that look a LOT like the engine's torque curve. The good thing also is if you map out your timing curve when you're avoiding knock... this curve very much looks like the inverse of the airmass curve. The result? Well it's another 10.7kw/14hp kw from where I drove it in at. Pretty much everywhere, too. As to how much this car actually makes in Hub Dyno numbers, American Dyno numbers, or Mainline dyno numbers, I say I don't know and it's gone up ~25kw since I started tinkering lol. It IS interesting how the shorter ratio gears I have aren't scaled right on this dyno - 6840RPM is 199KMH, not 175KMH. I have also seen other printouts here with cars with less mods at much higher "kmh" for their RPM due Commodores having 3.45's or longer (!) rear diff ratios maxing out 4th gear which is the 1:1 gear on the T56. Does this matter? No, not really. The real answer is go to the strip and see what it traps, but: I guess I should have gone last Sunday...
×
×
  • Create New...