Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

G'day R31Nismoid, just wondering why you were so quick to say no, can you see a problem with this that wouldn't work? Thankyou.

depends how you look at it.

to make yourself forget it.

nissan are doing it, but what combo is the turbo gonna have?

Shitty wheels and stuff that are good for stock but hopeless for modification?

How long will it last?

What if a turbo dies? What is the replacement cost gonna be like?

Say you change a BOV from stock and you get a bit of flutter etc, will that shit the motor or whatever they use?

lots of things that i wouldnt wanna find out myself as it would be costly

nissan are doing it, but what combo is the turbo gonna have?

I haven't checked for awhile, but the last thing I read (thanks to Rezz) was saying a twin turbo setup with electric motors to "pre-spool" the turbos.

Shitty wheels and stuff that are good for stock but hopeless for modification?

I assume by "shitty" you don't mean "shitty" quality but "shitty" size? We'll just have to wait and see, but the gentlemens agreement between Jap. manufacturers is dead and Nissan keeps making hints about challenging Porsche, so I don't think it will be that conservative (though longevity is always a consideration for OEM solutions).

How long will it last?

I imagine it will be like the existing setups: 100,000KM/5 years before overhaul. Then again, who actually follows Nissan's recommendations :rofl:

What if a turbo dies? What is the replacement cost gonna be like?

Horrendous would be my guess: its going to be used on a expensive sportscar after all. But remember, plain old turbos use to be expensive at one stage.

Say you change a BOV from stock and you get a bit of flutter etc, will that shit the motor or whatever they use?

Electric motors should (AFAIK) have no problems going in reverse. Perhaps one of the engineers on here could comment.

Lucien.

It is a perfectly feasible concept to have the turbo spooled up by an electric motor. The actual logistics of doing it make it a little more difficult.

A turbo might use 5-10kW of power. A 5-10kW motor is reasonably large so there are packaging issues for one. The main problem however is providing power to the thing, and the problem with this is the amps required because we are only working at 12V.

For 10kW, you would need around 830A @ 12V. So you are talking big cabling and either a huge alternator or some form of stored energy (ie a battery). Also a 12V 10kW motor needs to have really large conductors inside because of the high currents involved, meaning it's big and heavy.

WRT the comments that they would take more power than they make, I don't think this is neccesarily true, as long as you could design a nice efficient system (I'd think ~5% loss in the motor would be achievable and you might also lose another 5-10% in the rest of the electrical system). So it might use 1-2kW more than what a conventional turbo would, which is more than made up for by the extra power that you get from FI.

I don't know anything about what Nissan are planning on doing, however my comments above are based on full load, constant operation. Once you start to get into short term transient stuff, like what i'm imagining their system does, then you can start scaling the size of everything down.

Anti Lag... Basically a fuel injector and spark plug in the exhaust manifold so that when you come off the throttle, the fuel injector and spark plug go to work and continue to push air through the exhaust housing of the turbo, keeping it at full speed.

You hear Rally cars popping as they come into corners off the throttle, that's what it is.

... and overhaul your turbos every couple of hundred clicks.

Lucien.

:D i love this comment; (im currently studing mech eng, so i do alot of study relating to materials, chem etc etc)

lets take an example for you, it is very common for aftermarket turbos to come with steel wheel correct?

depending on the grade of steel uses in the wheel; The Tensile Strength of Mild steel is 450MPa and has High Ductility, Just using a random Max temp from the net for Steel is 870C.

Now Antilag itself does the following retarding ignition timing so far as to cause the exhaust valve to open well into the power cycle, resulting in extremely hot and explosive gases rushing past the turbine, spinning the turbo up therefore reduing lag.

Now antilag will not be running all the time only when lag is present and if the users has it switch on; so ruff calulcation would show that the steel would be able to handle the temp, also even if the turbo wheel is under CREEP, it shouldnt affect the wheel greatly as it would take along time for the affects to show

Also i know numerals cars which run antilag constantly, all of them are WRX, i have never seen this antilag on a nissan in real life but i would like to try it myself when i get my aftermarket turbo ;)

cheers michael

edit: also the heat which is resulted from the antilag, will only be a few seconds and would not be closes together therefore the steel in the wheel will be able to cool down and therefore the affect of the heat would be greatly reduces

Generally Anti Lag is only referred to in racing circles, where it's not really used during gear changes, its more used when you are off the throttle for the braking up to a corner.

This can be for several seconds. The antilag keeps the turbo spinning using fuel injected into the exhaust manifold so that when you get back on the throttle, you have full boost.

It's not really that good for any part of your turbo system. This type of system is only used on race cars.

The launch control style of Antilag involves a 0 kph speed limiter also to allow the drive to hold full throttle and the timing is retarded to increase boost. This system is turned off as soon as 1kph is registered.

There are other ways to get around lag. If your doing it yourself the motor thing is just far too much effort. Factory is much much different, they have a lot more money to throw at R&D, and production.

Other ways might be, a good tune, a good exaust manifold. Keeping the exaust gases and their heat inside the pipe work, hot air travels faster as it is thiner. You can go for a heavier than standard fly wheel. If the car is already rolling, jump on the brakes and the go go go pedal. Basically putting load on the engine, and bring it on boost earlier.

Gts_evilution

Refer to the two comments in the page posted up by Links. Anti lag is very hot and very violent = short life span.

A quick rise of the turbocharger's temperature (which jumps from ~800°C to the 1100°C+ region) whenever the system is activated

A huge stress on the exhaust manifold and pipes (mounted on a street car a bang-bang system would destroy the exhaust system within 50-100 km)

The turbo produces significant boost even at engine idle speeds

The explosions which occur in the exhaust tubes generate important flames which can, sometimes,  be seen at the end of the exhaust tube

Reduced engine brake

Gts_evilution

Refer to the two comments in the page posted up by Links. Anti lag is very hot and very violent = short life span.

cheers for the reply :thumbsup: i agree with the comments about the exhuast, the cat would not stand a chance.

Now that you have given me any idea about the lvl of the temp the turbo will go through when antilag is uses, i should be able to calucator if the turbo will be able to hold the temp, just need to find the grade of steel/metal uses in the turbo, if anyone has any idea please post up

cheers

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I had 3 counts over the last couple of weeks once where i got stranded at a jdm paint yard booking in some work. 2nd time was moving the car into the drive way for the inspection and the 3rd was during the inspection for the co2 leak test. Fix: 1st, car off for a hour and half disconnected battery 10mins 4th try car started 2nd, 5th try started 3rd, countless time starting disconnected battery dude was under the hood listening to the starting sequence fuel pump ect.   
    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...