Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

There seems to be a lot of threads lot on what would win stock for stock for 0-400m and 0-100kmph. So I decided to make this list as a bit of a guide. Sources vary but I tried to take the manufactures claimed times were possible.

I will update it from time to time.

0-100kmph 0-400m

NISSAN

R34 GTT 6.2 14.2

R33 GTS25T 6.18 14.4

R32 GTST 6.5 14.8

GTR

R32 4.7 13

R33 4.9 13.2

R34 4.9 13.1

300ZX Z32 TT 2Seater 5.6 14.2

Silvia S13/180sx

CA18DET 6.9 15

SR20DET 6.2 14.5

S15 Jap spec 5.5 13.8

TOYOTA

MR2 GT 6.12 14.37

Soarer SC400 2.5TT 7 15.1

Soarer SC400 V8 8.9 16.5

Supra RZ 5.92 13.93

Supra SZ 6.6 14.9

Mazda RX7

86-88 Turbo 6.8 14.4

89-91 Turbo 6.5 14.4

95 Twin Turbo 5.2 14.0

Mitsubishi

99 magna V6 8.2 16.2

Holden

VN V6 man 7.9 15.68

VP V6 man 8 15.5

VR V6 auto 9.3 16.8

VN SS 7.4 15.24

VS SS 7.34 15.27

VT SS Gen3 6.4 14.4

VX SS 6.23 14.35

VY SS S1 5.8 14.24

VY SS S2 5.8 13.94

VZ SS 5.82 13.99

HSV

VP GTS 7.2 15.2

VR GTS 6.6 14.8

VX clubsport 5.7 13.9

VX GTS 300 5.1 13.3

VY Clubsport S2 5.3 13.5

Subaru

99 WRX 5.91 14.12

03 WRX 5.8 14

03 STI 5.43 13.62

Ford

EB2 6 9.3 16.8

EL 6 8.9 16.8

AU 6 8.8 16.3

EL XR8 7.5 15.5

BA XR8 6.1 14.1

BA XR6T 5.9 14.1

FPV

Typhoon F6 5.7 14.0

GT 5.9 14.2

Edited by Munna
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/80479-0-100-and-0-400m-times/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

No mate. Drag is just dull unless the topfuel/doorslammer cars are running. I CBF hurting my car that way.

RWD's, I know of a slicked up GTSt that runs 10's so it would take me to 100 :P but most of the guys out there are running Jap suspension that just won't grip for the quarter. Even mine is too hard for the launch but good for circuit. Low to mid fives on street rubber is the best I'd expect from a T that is really well sorted as they have to balance revs/boost and wheelspin is just too easy to get.

0-100 4.5 damn best I can manage is 5.2.
It was in the cheater GTR though. Pretty stock but 260rwkw due to boost and fuel reg. Pretty easy to do and not hard on the gear. I use 5500rpm and feed throttle while I slip the clutch. Was a real buzz.

5.2 is good for rwd. I find the more power, the harder to stop wheelspin in the GTSt

It was in the cheater GTR though. Pretty stock but 260rwkw due to boost and fuel reg. Pretty easy to do and not hard on the gear. I use 5500rpm and feed throttle while I slip the clutch. Was a real buzz.

 

5.2 is good for rwd. I find the more power, the harder to stop wheelspin in the GTSt

Ahh cheeter 4wd wish I had one. Id find it very hard to do 5.2's consistantly with my rwd

Does anyone rate the Gtech for 0-100/0-400 times? I know they can't be exact - but are the newer versions pretty close to the money?

I do... MY 0-100 time on the g-tech was 4.8 seconds....

My 1/4 mile time was 13.3 seconds...

First time at willowbank raceway i got 13.7 and by the third run i had 13.23 @101

So i reckon the g-tech is pretty acurate (not as good as the real thing of course but its a great indication....

I do... MY 0-100 time on the g-tech was 4.8 seconds....

My 1/4 mile time was 13.3 seconds...

First time at willowbank raceway i got 13.7 and by the third run i had 13.23 @101

So i reckon the g-tech is pretty acurate (not as good as the real thing of course but its a great indication....

just brought one off ebay for $45 the early gtech pro model so when I get it I will let who all know how I go. I will lend it to a few of my mates with quick cars to and compare and list the results.

Nice effort Munna.

Where's my car? :O

I think the Gtech is quite accurrate however some runs may be questionable.

I did a few runs a couple weeks ago. Most were flat 5 but managed one of 4.57 so I doubted it a bit. Haven't taken car out again to confirm.

When it was stock the gtech did produce times which were similar to manufacturer times so I wouldn't say it's impossible to achieve the same results.

Gtech's are great if you want to see if your mods make much difference to the car. My times didn't change after getting the CAT back so it was useless besides the sound, however after getting a tune it gave me a smile.

  • 2 weeks later...
I think your wrong on the r32 gtst 6.9 claim.

In the japanese import buyers guide, the test results of 0-100 times for even an AUTO r32 gts t was 6.89 seconds, and if this was manual the tester expected low 6 second times.

Yep thanks mate did some more research and the time I had was probably for an auto. Found a couple of sites which claim around 6.5 and 14.8.

cheers

  • 3 weeks later...
5.2 is good for rwd. I find the more power, the harder to stop wheelspin in the GTSt

Best I managed in the R32 with the Rb20DET was 5.2, it was consistent and easy to launch.

The RB30DET.. :P Initially I lost 1 whole sec, 6.2, zero traction in first, second is fine providing the change is smooth.

I've since managed to get it down to 5.9secs, the trick was not to over-rev it, change at 5100rpm and its fine. lol, damn small turbo. :huh:

6.9 0-100 for the R32 I think is on the money. Mine was damn slow when 100% stock and making 115rwkw. :blink:

Edited by Cubes

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
    • Hi,  Just joined the forum so I could share my "fix" of this problem. Might be of use to someone. Had the same hunting at idle issue on my V36 with VQ35HR engine after swapping the engine because the original one got overheated.  While changing the engine I made the mistake of cleaning the throttle bodies and tried all the tricks i could find to do a throttle relearn with no luck. Gave in and took it to a shop and they couldn't sort it. Then took it to my local Nissan dealership and they couldn't get it to idle properly. They said I'd need to replace the throttle bodies and the ecu probably costing more than the car is worth. So I had the idea of replacing the carbon I cleaned out with a thin layer of super glue and it's back to normal idle now. Bit rough but saved the car from the wreckers 🤣
    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
×
×
  • Create New...