Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I assume by sports filter you mean a 'pod filter'? If thats the case and you have no heat sheild it will cause power to drop off due to sucking in hot engine bay air. The BOV isn't doing you any favours with a standard ecu either.

The good news is there a few things you can do to up the power without breaking the bank. That should see you up another 40rwkw+. There is a sticky thread in the forced induction section on the most commonly asked questions to help you out.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/81151-dyno-result/#findComment-1474868
Share on other sites

yep pod filter...

i got front mount waiting to be fitted, wolf 3d, and im thinking of buying hks gt-rs so getting more power shouldnt be a problem, the only thing is if the engine is healthy, and power curvr is perfect, linear no dips...i think west racing has lowest reading dyno in western australia as year ago they had some tests on all dynos and they got 310hp on some commodore and Mayeree dyno had 390hp, sst 370hp etc ill try to find the article

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/81151-dyno-result/#findComment-1474896
Share on other sites

there's the article

hey stuck a commodore ute on 9 different dyno's around perth.

the test was actually on a gold sedan with Kosteckis new head and cam package that will be distributed through Crow Cams. the results were as follows:

BRE performance - 305hp

Genie Performance - 364hp

Kwinana Performance - 356hp

T&R Green - 365hp (Shoot-out mode)

Myaree Dyno- 393.6hp

West Racing - 312hp

D&T Performance - 347.5hp

Street Force - 358hp

SST Automotive - 367.7hp (Shoot-out mode)

so my car was at west racing which is second lowest reading dyno out of 9...hmmm i wanna go to other dyno place to test it?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/81151-dyno-result/#findComment-1474919
Share on other sites

Aslong as your car is healthy who cares what power it's making:confused: Will a power graph showing 400rwhp make the car any faster? If you make future changes you want to compare it on the same dyno, else you won't know if the change was worthwhile.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/81151-dyno-result/#findComment-1475140
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...