Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

fitted rear r32 gtr discs, rebuilt calipers (with speed bleeders) and r32 gtr (front) braided brakeline

fittted front r32 gtr rebuilt calipers, cpz bracket, 324x30mm 350z track rotors drilled, with stagea (front) braided brakeline

pads are qfma1rm all round

mags needed to clear are 18x8.5"

on the r32 track car Im putting on the stagea rear rotors, stagea rear braided line, stagea rear calipers & pads

on the front goes the wilwood superlite calipers & matching braided brakeline & pads, plus a new set of dba 4000 rotors Ive got sitting here

Dixcel Part No.'s for Series 2 Discs WGNC34.

I'd be pretty sure they be straight swap, OD/Offset/Thickness same.

PD-Normal Disc

SD-Slotted Disc

HD-Heat Treated Disc

HS-Heat Treated Slotted Disc

The rrp price is there too converted from yen (currently 76.6)

DIXCEL 98/8~01/12 WGNC34

Front Part No. 321 2013

pd 218.41

sd 327.62

hd 341.16

hs 450.34

Rear Part No. 325 2018

pd 218.41

sd 300.23

hd 354.81

hs 453.99

is that per rotor or per pair (assume pair)?

can anyone confirm whether brakes are the same between RS Four and RS Four S (i would assume so)?

actually, according to the Dixcel website, i believe the part numbers are (for S2 C34):

FRONT - 321 2013

REAR - 325 2016

(as opposed to 325 2018)

i am sourcing pricing from japanparts, and will pass on the details

apparently all S2 are the same, but S1 are different

for S1 C34, i believe the part numbers are:

FRONT - 321 2019

REAR - 325 2018

cheers

Edited by Stooge007

*** Series 2 Stagea Pads now back in to stock ***

Apologies to all those that have been waiting patiently on the back order list, we now have stock of the S2 Stagea pads to suit both street and track.

Front HPX $119

Rear HPX $79

Front A1RM $179

Rear A1RM $179

- HPX is a Bendix Ultimate/EBC Green/Project Mu B Spec equivalent performance street pad.

- A1RM is a Bendix SRT/Ferodo DS2500/Project Mu HC+ equivalent street/track cross over pad.

Any questions, or to order, just swing me a PM, or give us a bell on 1300 884 836. Free shipping when you order front and rear together, or else $8 per axle set individually.

Regards,

Greg

  • 2 weeks later...

Fitted some RDA954S rotors and some Greenstuff pads on the weekend.

The RDA954 rotors definitely fit s2 RS4V, anyone having fitment problems, make sure the calliper is clear of the rotor (use a screwdriver for leverage, make sure the rotor is nipped up with a wheel nut so it is held tight) before tightening the calliper bolts.

actual dimensions for ROTORS series 2 1999 rs4s

FRONT -

diameter 290mm

height 48mm

centre 68mm

minimum thickness 26mm

brand new thickness 28mm

REAR -

diameter 292mm

height 63mm

centre 68mm

minimum thickness 16mm ( couldnt remember exactly what measurement was here but pretty sure this was it could be 14)

brand new thickness 18mm ( couldnt remember exactly what measurement was here but pretty sure this was it could be 16)

so far from my searches nothing is exactly the same.

and from what i could see on dixcel japan website is that there are 4 or more different type of rotors between series 1 and 2 some going right through all models so it is possible that some suggestions that have been posted will work on some cars and for others it wont so make sure u do ur research b4 u buy or take some of the advice on here

If series 2 RS4S is the same as series 2 RS4V, then the 350Z rotors will fit.

i have had it at a brake specialists for the last 2 days and they said they will not be right 1st major difference is the thickness of the rotor od is out and height is slightly out on the 954s rotor

i have had it at a brake specialists for the last 2 days and they said they will not be right 1st major difference is the thickness of the rotor od is out and height is slightly out on the 954s rotor

BUBBA just let them get on with it,

CAN`T HELP SOME so let him get fed BULLSHIT

i have had it at a brake specialists for the last 2 days and they said they will not be right 1st major difference is the thickness of the rotor od is out and height is slightly out on the 954s rotor

Whatever you want to get fed is up to you, I fitted them on the weekend.

BUBBA just let them get on with it,

CAN`T HELP SOME so let him get fed BULLSHIT

Agreed, I'm over it.

Anyone found a solution for dogbones to fit 324mm GTR rotors yet? :cool:

With 33gtst/32R calipers yes, I have a solution that *should* work but haven't tried it yet. I have a set of dogbones that fit on non-4wd front hubs but they hit the lower ball joint on 4wd hubs. I have another set that are supposedly off a z32 that offset the caliper as opposed to the other ones which rotate it.

With stock calipers, not yet as I need to solve the offset issue.

Edited by bubba

meh...

must have been the small print on screen.

here's a screen capture for all to refer to.

actually, according to the Dixcel website, i believe the part numbers are (for S2 C34):

FRONT - 321 2013

REAR - 325 2016

(as opposed to 325 2018)

i am sourcing pricing from japanparts, and will pass on the details

apparently all S2 are the same, but S1 are different

for S1 C34, i believe the part numbers are:

FRONT - 321 2019

REAR - 325 2018

cheers

post-38314-1284111527_thumb.jpg

** S1 Stagea Pads Now In Stock!!! **

Hi all, we've just received our long awaited first shipment of QFM Performance Pads to suit S1 Stagea!!! Available in both compounds, QFM HPX (Bendix Ultimate equivalent, fast street) and QFM A1RM (Ferodo DS2500 equivalent, fast street and track). Prices as follows:

HPX Fronts $119

HPX Rear $119

A1RM Fronts $179

A1RM Rear $179

Shipping is free when you order front and rear pads together, or else $8 per axle set individually!

Any questions at all just let me know!

Regards,

Greg

  • 2 weeks later...
Fitted up new front slotted rotors with new pads today and if it doesn't rain tomorrow I will fit new rear slotted rotors and pads then bleed brakes allround.

Which rotors did you use on the front, RDA 954S? I've had my set machined down and will be fitting them tomorrow.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You won't need to do that if your happy to learn to tune it yourself. You 100% do not need to do that. It is not part of the learning process. It's not like driving on track and 'finding the limit by stepping over the limit'. You should not ever accidently blow up an engine and you should have setup the ECU's engine protection to save you from yourself while you are learning anyway. Plenty of us have tuned their own cars, myself included. We still come here for advice/guidance/new ideas etc.  What have you been doing so far to learn how to tune?
    • Put the ECU's MAP line in your mouth. Blow as hard as you can. You should be able to see about 10 kPa, maybe 15 kPa positive pressure. Suck on it. You should be able to generate a decent vacuum to about the same level also. Note that this is only ~2 psi either way. If the MAP is reading -5 psi all the time, ignition on, engine running or not, driving around or not, then it is severely f**ked. Also, you SHOULD NOT BE DRIVING IT WITHOUT A LOAD REFERENCE. You will break the engine. Badly.
    • Could be correct. Meter might be that far out. Compare against a known 5 ohm 1% resistor.
    • @Murray_Calavera  If I were an expert I wouldn't be in here looking for assistance.  I am extremely computer literate, have above average understanding on how things should be working and how they should tie together.  If I need to go to a professional tuner so be it, but I'd much rather learn and do things myself even if it means looking for some guidance along the way and blowing up a few engines. @GTSBoy  I was hoping it would be as simple as a large vacuum leak somewhere but I'm unable to find anything, all lines seem to be well capped or going where they need to be, and when removed there is vacuum felt on the tube.  It would be odd for the Haltech built in MAP to be faulty, the GTT tune I imported had it enabled from the start, I incorrectly assumed it was reading a signal from the stock MAP, but that doesn't exist.  After running a vacuum hose to the ECU the signal doesn't change more than 0.2 in either direction.   I'll probably upload a video of my settings tomorrow, as it stands I'm able to daily drive, but getting stuttering when giving it gas from idle, so pulling away from lights is a slow process of revving it up and feathering the clutch until its moving, then it will accelerate fine.  It sounds like I need to get to the bottom of the manifold pressure issue, but the ignition timing section is most intimidating to me and will probably let a pro do that part.  Tomorrow I'll try a different vacuum line to T off of, with any luck I selected one that was already bypassed during the DBW swap.  (edit: I went out and did it right now, the line I had chosen did appear to have no vacuum on it, it used to go to the front of the intake, I've now completely blocked that one off at the bracket that holds several vacuum lines by the firewall.  I T'd into the vacuum line that goes from that bracket to the vacuum pump at the front of the car, but no change in the MAP readings).  Using the new vacuum line that has obvious vacuum on the hose, im still only getting readings between -6.0 and -5.2.  I'm wondering why the ECU was detecting -5.3 when nothing was connected to the MAP nipple and ECU MAP selected as the source. @feartherb26  I do have +T in the works but wanted to wait until Spring to start with that swap since this is my good winter AWD vehicle.  When removing the butterfly, did it leave a bunch of holes in the manifold that you needed to plug?  I thought about removing it but assumed it would be a mess.   I notice no difference when capping the vacuum line to it or letting it do its thing.  This whole thing has convinced me to just get a forward facing manifold when the time comes though.
    • Update: tested my spark plugs that are supposed to be 5ohms with a 10% deviation and one gave me a 0 ohms reading and the rest were 3.9ohm<, so one bad and the others on their way out.
×
×
  • Create New...