Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

10 months rego

73500km

grey coupe

Always serviced with the best gear.

Just got timming belt replaced, diff oil changed, gear box oil changed, plugs,

fuel & oil filter changed, coolant changed.

All done cause i was going to keep the car and wanted to know all was up to

spec! Though I cannot afford to keep it as i have other depts to keep up with!

Whoever buys the car is getting a bargain!

MODS\EXTRAS

3" turbo back exhaust, two stage boost controller,

brass button clutch & heavy duty pressure plate,

k&n panel filter, 18" deep dish rims Chrome),

sports steering wheel,nismo gear knob,

pioneer head unit, kicker 6.5" splits (front), mb quarts (rear),

two kicker amps, 15" JBL sub, autometer boost guage.

All in immaculate condition 14.5k

Ashfield, SYDNEY

If you would like to see the car or ask questions feel free to contact

me on 0425 342 258 anytime.

Damien

Oh yeah... as for pics, I'm working on that!

post-13433-1123582060.jpg

Edited by Damien
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/83338-r-33-gtst-135k-need-to-sell-asap/
Share on other sites

Would give you $14k but i need to sell my car first...

give me a call so we can talk about it some more...

0401757778

im at mt druitt and can take a loook tmorrow :)

Hey guys, sorry for the late reply. The car is still for sale and that is all the info and pics I've got for the car.

If anyone would like to see the car please don't hesitate to contact me on

0425 342 258

I have had quite a few enquiries but none genuine.

I am firm on the price (13.5k).

Regards

Damien

pics to madwob (at) hotmail .com

interested, but am in melb. so pics will help a lot thanks mate...not just after pics for no reason

Hey damo,

What is happening in regard to looking at the car...?

When will it take place? Im a little dissapointed that you couldnt even call to tell me you couldnt make it, i could have been stuck at that maccas for another hour waiting for you..

PM or email me - sindows (at) sindows.net

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...