Jump to content
SAU Community

Fitting A New Lambda Sensor


Sydneykid
 Share

Recommended Posts

OK, well it is 2 tank fulls later (800k's) and I can safely say replacing the lambda sensor made no diference what so ever to the fuel economy. It definitely runs nicer, doesn't hesitate when full throttle is applied after long periods of idling (damn Sydney traffic) and cruising. But fuel ecomomy is totally unchanged.

Gotta get that exhaust on and tune it up some more on the dyno. Just need a spare few hours.

:( cheers :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

Quite a few guys recently have asked me about this thread via PM. So I figured it was time to bump it up the list a bit.

:D cheers :dry:

Edited by Sydneykid
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nissan recommends changing them every 40,000k's. They don't "wear out" in a mechanical sense. They just get contaminated and don't read the A/F ratios properly.

Interesting to say the least. So how do you know when to replace them? It's not cheap enough just to do it for the sake of it.

How sensitive are they to being knocked around. A friend dropped his once on the bench and it would not work properly after that. I recently dropped mine while doing the dump pipe upgrade - How do I know it is still working?

Would really be interested to know how they work internally?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They use some sort of chemical reaction to create a voltage once they are at the right temperature (which is why they have heater wires as well) THe chemicals get tired after a while and dont work anymore.

The best way to tell if its stuffed is to use a consult cable to monitor the voltage, stuffed ones read 0 or jump around at odd times. Unfortunately working ones jump around a bit too so it is hard to tell if it is dying unless you have a gtr (2 sensors so you can compare voltage)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I took my car out to CRD to get tuned a week ago - they told me my o2 sensor was stuffed and told me a new one would cost $300+ as well as labour charge.

I get <200kms from a tank, if the o2 sensor was stuffed when they tuned it, does that mean it needs tuning again when i put my new o2 sensor in? or does the wide band one they use for tuning mean that it would have been tuned nicely anyway?

If i replace a stuffed o2 sensor should i immediately see an improvement in fuel economy?

Does anyone have an online link to buy an o2 sensor online? to save me a trip to repco...

And is their any adavantage to buying the genuine nissan part as opposed to the falcon part?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i have a falcon one and it works fine, no problems.

Thanks terminal - im thinking i will try to get a genuine part, or at least one that i dont have to change the wires on, would cost me more to get someone to change the falcon one over than it would to spend the extra on the genuine part.

I am taking it that all of this advice is relevant to R33 gts-t owners, not specifically stageas?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks terminal - im thinking i will try to get a genuine part, or at least one that i dont have to change the wires on, would cost me more to get someone to change the falcon one over than it would to spend the extra on the genuine part.

I am taking it that all of this advice is relevant to R33 gts-t owners, not specifically stageas?

The Falcon lambda sensor I used cost $78 from Repco. last time I checked the genuine Nissan one was $180. I don't think anyone is going to charge you $102 to swap over a plug, it's a 10 minute job.

:) Cheers :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Falcon lambda sensor I used cost $78 from Repco. last time I checked the genuine Nissan one was $180. I don't think anyone is going to charge you $102 to swap over a plug, it's a 10 minute job.

:) Cheers :)

Change of plan

I bought a falcon sensor from Repco i think it only cost me $58 (hope its the right one)

The auto elec is charging me about $70 to fit it... It was going to be a 2 week wait for the genuine nissan part.

Quick question, can the power FC be tuned with a faulty o2 sensor? i.e. does the wide band sensor they stick in the exhaust mean that it doenst matter about the faulty one up front?

The reason i ask this is because i just paid for my car to be tuned, and when i rang up complaining about fuel issues they told me my o2 sensor was buggered... So did they tune it right and the new sensor will fix my problems? or did i get ripped off?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Change of plan

I bought a falcon sensor from Repco i think it only cost me $58 (hope its the right one)

The auto elec is charging me about $70 to fit it... It was going to be a 2 week wait for the genuine nissan part.

Quick question, can the power FC be tuned with a faulty o2 sensor? i.e. does the wide band sensor they stick in the exhaust mean that it doenst matter about the faulty one up front?

The reason i ask this is because i just paid for my car to be tuned, and when i rang up complaining about fuel issues they told me my o2 sensor was buggered... So did they tune it right and the new sensor will fix my problems? or did i get ripped off?

Depends on what fuel issues you were complaining about, all the tuning under load they'd have used their Wideband O2 for, and your factory narrowband isn't part of the equation. But if your mixtures are wrong under light load and idle, and the Power FC is setup to use closed loop with the factory narrowband, then a stuffed one would be a problem yep.

How do you mean you've got fuel issues?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends on what fuel issues you were complaining about, all the tuning under load they'd have used their Wideband O2 for, and your factory narrowband isn't part of the equation. But if your mixtures are wrong under light load and idle, and the Power FC is setup to use closed loop with the factory narrowband, then a stuffed one would be a problem yep.

How do you mean you've got fuel issues?

Fuel issues are only getting 200km per tank which is costing me a fortune. doesnt seem to matter how i drive it (hard or soft) i still get terrible fuel economy... having a new o2 sensor installed as we speak

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fuel issues are only getting 200km per tank which is costing me a fortune. doesnt seem to matter how i drive it (hard or soft) i still get terrible fuel economy... having a new o2 sensor installed as we speak

Then they could be talking about lack of closed loop control giving you poor cruise/idle fuel economy(due to stuffed O2). Generally in a full tune, they would input fuel values for all conditions that were close to ideal, so you shouldn't get shocking fuel economy after a good tune, even without closed loop control.

I don't get heaps better than that myself (used 16L to do 71km's around town the other day, but prob too much boosting). But anyway, I thought mine was too rich, and thought factory O2 was stuffed. Last night I put my LC-1 Wideband O2 sensor on it and went for a drive, 14.5:1 under all idle and cruise conditions! That surprised me, thought it'd be far worse.

Would be very much to your advantage if you could borrow/buy an Innovate Motorsports LM-1/LC-1 and analyse your mixtures, then you'd know before/after, and not have to put all trust in what the workshop tells you. Not too mention you'd then have crucial gear for tuning your ecu yourself if you ever wanted to.

I reluctantly paid $400 (NZ) for mine(and display it on my old laptop), but now I love it and can't imagine not buying it, I'd have no idea what my cars are doing!

Bottomline, it's hard to diagnose fuel troubles, especially with an aftermarket ecu, without some kind of AF reading gear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let’s clear up this “closed loop tuning” issue. There is no such thing as “closed loop tuning”, the standard ECU has a simple lambda aim table loaded into its mapping. In a Power FC that is in fact one number, around 15 to 1 A/F ratio.

This means whenever the parameters are met (idle or cruise) the ECU reads of the standard (narrow and slow) lambda sensor and tries to hit the targeted A/F ratio. So it increases or decreases the injector duration continuously trying to keep at 15 to 1. As long as the lambda sensor is working correctly the ECU will always aim for its target A/F ratio, hence there is no tuning required.

Remember with all closed loop running it doesn’t happen instantly, the throttle opening has to be constant, the rpm has to be stable and the (slow and narrow) lambda sensor has to have enough time to read off the A/F ratio and tell the ECU what it is.

This is where a slight improvement in fuel economy can be gained by utilising a fast and wide lambda sensor. By tuning the fuel map locations around the closed loop location (idle and cruise) to give around 15 to 1 A/F ratios. This means that you save that little extra fuel while the ECU is fiddling around reading the lambda sensor etc.

If you have a read of the Tech Edge thread in Forced Induction, I go into some detail on how I tuned the idle and cruise A/F ratios.

:devil: cheers :down:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fuel issues are only getting 200km per tank which is costing me a fortune. doesnt seem to matter how i drive it (hard or soft) i still get terrible fuel economy... having a new o2 sensor installed as we speak

A perfectly working lambda sensor is unlikely to improve the fuel economy from 200 k's per tank. Maybe 20 k's, depending on how much time you spend at cruise or idle. If it's a lot of the time while you are driving, then you might get 15%, but if you spend hardly any time idling and cruising then it won't make much difference at all.

Personally my guess would be you have other problems, not the least of which is tuning.

:devil: cheers :down:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A perfectly working lambda sensor is unlikely to improve the fuel economy from 200 k's per tank. Maybe 20 k's, depending on how much time you spend at cruise or idle. If it's a lot of the time while you are driving, then you might get 15%, but if you spend hardly any time idling and cruising then it won't make much difference at all.

Personally my guess would be you have other problems, not the least of which is tuning.

:wave: cheers :D

I just paid to have it tuned...

Is there anything else it could be?

I spend a lot of time at idle, but not much at cruise... i cant afford to keep running the car like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
    • Easiest way to know is to break out the multimeter and measure it when cold, then measure all the resistances again once it gets hot enough to misfire. Both the original ignitor and the J Replace version. Factory service manual will have the spec for the terminal measurements.
×
×
  • Create New...