Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Sorry "hard tuned" (before I edited it) meant cars with programmable ECUs that tuned to make more power than the stockie ECU. Ie leaner AFRs, more ign advance. Thus they are more succeptable to detonation from a shitty fuel. (being 'harder tuned' than factory if you get what i mean).

They were certainly more succeeptable to detonation after Mik touched them.

Liberty and SAFF now both offer 98RON ethanol enhanced fuel. There is a website that i got from one of Liberty's pamphlets on their 'boost 98' which lists which manufacturers recomend ethanol based fuels. Sadly Nissan say only compatiable with post 2004 model cars, stating fuel componet incompatibilty, or something along those lines. I don't really want to compromise the integrity of the fuel system for a 6-8c a litre saving. Having said that, before i found this out, i ran a full tank of the 'boost98' and found that when going for a cruise through the hills, the ol girl seemed to die a little up the odd hill, actually having to change down a gear to accelerate, not normal. Car in question is R32 gts-t, usual fmic, turbo back exhaust, 14psi and 040.

Liberty and SAFF now both offer 98RON ethanol enhanced fuel. There is a website that i got from one of Liberty's pamphlets on their 'boost 98' which lists which manufacturers recomend ethanol based fuels. Sadly Nissan say only compatiable with post 2004 model cars, stating fuel componet incompatibilty, or something along those lines. I don't really want to compromise the integrity of the fuel system for a 6-8c a litre saving.  Having said that, before i found this out, i ran a full tank of the 'boost98' and found that when going for a cruise through the hills, the ol girl seemed to die a little up the odd hill, actually having to change down a gear to accelerate, not normal. Car in question is R32 gts-t, usual fmic, turbo back exhaust, 14psi and 040.

it was normal, 91 octane lol....don't worry that fuel didn't last very long at all.

it's like running the car on cordial!

Ah, there you go then!!!

Ethanol is crap as a fuel.

Forget the hype, it may not hurt your engine, but it will hurt your pocket!

Ethanol has a calorific value of 1/2 - 2/3 that of petrol. That means, the same volume of ethanol will produce less energy than petrol. SO, it might be cheaper, but your fuel economy will suffer.

Ok, I have done a little bit more research on this fuel.

Speaking to Martin Donnon today, it turns out this fuel CAN be a good thing. If tuned for this "boost 98" every car he's seen has picked up power in comparison to regular 98 octane fuel.

There is a catch however. He showed me some dyno graphs, and just by changing to this from another 98RON fuel, the car LEANED OUT BY A FULL AFR POINT (ie 12.5-13.5).

This would explain the increase in performance experienced by owners of cars with factory style rich tunes, but if your car is tuned on regular 98, and is "on the edge" I would steer clear, it could give you problems.

Joel, did you end up getting any? Do any logging of your car and the differences between fuels?

Sorry "hard tuned" (before I edited it) meant cars with programmable ECUs that tuned to make more power than the stockie ECU. Ie leaner AFRs, more ign advance. Thus they are more succeptable to detonation from a shitty fuel. (being 'harder tuned' than factory if you get what i mean).

Are you kidding? How many Skylines or other imports out there actually don't have programmable ECUs these days. Surely only poofs own Skylines without prorammable ECUs :).

The ONLY reason people buy Power FCs etc is to reprogram fuel and ignition to make more power, this typically means more ignition advance and less fuel.....or have I misunderstood your statement that there are bugger all hard tuned import cars in SA?!?!?

Are you kidding?  How many Skylines or other imports out there actually don't have programmable ECUs these days.  Surely only poofs own Skylines without prorammable ECUs :).

The ONLY reason people buy Power FCs etc is to reprogram fuel and ignition to make more power, this typically means more ignition advance and less fuel.....or have I misunderstood your statement that there are bugger all hard tuned import cars in SA?!?!?

....or did Nozilla say it?.....

well i run stanadard ecu at the moment so i guess i'm a poof, unlike your good self i don't make a heap of money so a programmable ecu hasn't come into my budget yet, i sincerely apologise! (if u couldn't tell i was bein sarcastic!)

  • 3 weeks later...

Got a tank of this at the moment, thought I'd give it a try

So far so good, knock levels on the PFC are much the same, and th weather has been a bit warmer the last few days too

Feels better than with BP 98 in it, more of a crispness to the exhaust note I reckon

Chops - what you said about the AFR's leaning out - would this have anything to do with the 10% ethanol content in the fuel not being able to be read by the current range of AFR meters used by dyno operators................

I spoke to a guy at the SAFF stand at the show, and he was saying they dyno tested the fuel on allot of cars, and they came to the conclusion that due to the ethanol content in the fuel, the AFR meters struggled to read this

My guess is Martins cars picked up power because he added fuel to compensate, and there is your power gain......

Most of the cars I have seen Martin tune, mine included, where quite lean, so by adding fuel to his tune, might xplain the power gain??

Also, ethanol, being like a alchohol, should cool the inlet charge a tad better than fuel when it gets injected shouldn't it?

Just my two cents!! :D

Ethanol contains oxygen (CH3CH2OH) and therefore the fuel provides some of the oxygen required for combusion itself.

Therefore, if tuning is not altered, for the same mass of air and fuel, there will be less unused fuel in the exhaust, which will be read as a "leaner AFR".

Yes, the cooling effect you explain also sounds likely.

Yeah, that was my thinking too

One thing I can report, as you pointed out, is that the economy seems to be poorer than that attained with Mobil or BP fuel

Either that, or my attempts to test its ability has meant I have driven the car a little harder :P

So far, its hard to say if its better or not, definatley a tad cheaper, but it looks like you burn more of it, so the cost advantage kinda cancels eachother out

Anyone else tried it?

I'm thinking it would be great stuff with a das of toluene in it.........

ethanol is a good knock retardation so you can run a bit more timing

ethanol contains oxygen so more fuel is needed compare to before

overall you will use more fuel than before but produce more power from more timing advance.

Fuel consumption will depends on your right foot.

Ethanol contains oxygen (CH3CH2OH) and therefore the fuel provides some of the oxygen required for combusion itself.

Therefore, if tuning is not altered, for the same mass of air and fuel, there will be less unused fuel in the exhaust, which will be read as a "leaner AFR".

Yes, the cooling effect you explain also sounds likely.

I agree with 9krpm, the fact that Ethanol has more oxygen in it means it is has less potential to burn because it is already down the path of oxidation. Therefore more fuel is required for the same bang and the bang is smaller at the same time.

On balance, I reckon Ethanol in fuel is crap.

Toluene is good because it is hard to burn so you can then run more timing with a lower isk of pinging. It also produces a bang equivalent to or better than say straight 98 octane petrol. They say BP98 does not use aromatics (like Toluene) to achieve 98 octane, so when you do add Toluene in, the Octane rating increases more readily.

I was going to rig up a water + ethanol injection system for high boost.

The ethanol is a good knock retardant and also produce extra O2....just like NOS but not as good. A lot of people gain more power with the water + ethanol injection system by leaning the engine out a little bit more than normal. However with this fuel available from pump I don't have to worry about the plumbing work.

I think it's a great fuel and will give it a try soon. I am still worried about long distant or interstate trips. Does anyone know if this fuel is available in other states?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
×
×
  • Create New...