Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Sorry "hard tuned" (before I edited it) meant cars with programmable ECUs that tuned to make more power than the stockie ECU. Ie leaner AFRs, more ign advance. Thus they are more succeptable to detonation from a shitty fuel. (being 'harder tuned' than factory if you get what i mean).

They were certainly more succeeptable to detonation after Mik touched them.

Liberty and SAFF now both offer 98RON ethanol enhanced fuel. There is a website that i got from one of Liberty's pamphlets on their 'boost 98' which lists which manufacturers recomend ethanol based fuels. Sadly Nissan say only compatiable with post 2004 model cars, stating fuel componet incompatibilty, or something along those lines. I don't really want to compromise the integrity of the fuel system for a 6-8c a litre saving. Having said that, before i found this out, i ran a full tank of the 'boost98' and found that when going for a cruise through the hills, the ol girl seemed to die a little up the odd hill, actually having to change down a gear to accelerate, not normal. Car in question is R32 gts-t, usual fmic, turbo back exhaust, 14psi and 040.

Liberty and SAFF now both offer 98RON ethanol enhanced fuel. There is a website that i got from one of Liberty's pamphlets on their 'boost 98' which lists which manufacturers recomend ethanol based fuels. Sadly Nissan say only compatiable with post 2004 model cars, stating fuel componet incompatibilty, or something along those lines. I don't really want to compromise the integrity of the fuel system for a 6-8c a litre saving.  Having said that, before i found this out, i ran a full tank of the 'boost98' and found that when going for a cruise through the hills, the ol girl seemed to die a little up the odd hill, actually having to change down a gear to accelerate, not normal. Car in question is R32 gts-t, usual fmic, turbo back exhaust, 14psi and 040.

it was normal, 91 octane lol....don't worry that fuel didn't last very long at all.

it's like running the car on cordial!

Ah, there you go then!!!

Ethanol is crap as a fuel.

Forget the hype, it may not hurt your engine, but it will hurt your pocket!

Ethanol has a calorific value of 1/2 - 2/3 that of petrol. That means, the same volume of ethanol will produce less energy than petrol. SO, it might be cheaper, but your fuel economy will suffer.

Ok, I have done a little bit more research on this fuel.

Speaking to Martin Donnon today, it turns out this fuel CAN be a good thing. If tuned for this "boost 98" every car he's seen has picked up power in comparison to regular 98 octane fuel.

There is a catch however. He showed me some dyno graphs, and just by changing to this from another 98RON fuel, the car LEANED OUT BY A FULL AFR POINT (ie 12.5-13.5).

This would explain the increase in performance experienced by owners of cars with factory style rich tunes, but if your car is tuned on regular 98, and is "on the edge" I would steer clear, it could give you problems.

Joel, did you end up getting any? Do any logging of your car and the differences between fuels?

Sorry "hard tuned" (before I edited it) meant cars with programmable ECUs that tuned to make more power than the stockie ECU. Ie leaner AFRs, more ign advance. Thus they are more succeptable to detonation from a shitty fuel. (being 'harder tuned' than factory if you get what i mean).

Are you kidding? How many Skylines or other imports out there actually don't have programmable ECUs these days. Surely only poofs own Skylines without prorammable ECUs :).

The ONLY reason people buy Power FCs etc is to reprogram fuel and ignition to make more power, this typically means more ignition advance and less fuel.....or have I misunderstood your statement that there are bugger all hard tuned import cars in SA?!?!?

Are you kidding?  How many Skylines or other imports out there actually don't have programmable ECUs these days.  Surely only poofs own Skylines without prorammable ECUs :).

The ONLY reason people buy Power FCs etc is to reprogram fuel and ignition to make more power, this typically means more ignition advance and less fuel.....or have I misunderstood your statement that there are bugger all hard tuned import cars in SA?!?!?

....or did Nozilla say it?.....

well i run stanadard ecu at the moment so i guess i'm a poof, unlike your good self i don't make a heap of money so a programmable ecu hasn't come into my budget yet, i sincerely apologise! (if u couldn't tell i was bein sarcastic!)

  • 3 weeks later...

Got a tank of this at the moment, thought I'd give it a try

So far so good, knock levels on the PFC are much the same, and th weather has been a bit warmer the last few days too

Feels better than with BP 98 in it, more of a crispness to the exhaust note I reckon

Chops - what you said about the AFR's leaning out - would this have anything to do with the 10% ethanol content in the fuel not being able to be read by the current range of AFR meters used by dyno operators................

I spoke to a guy at the SAFF stand at the show, and he was saying they dyno tested the fuel on allot of cars, and they came to the conclusion that due to the ethanol content in the fuel, the AFR meters struggled to read this

My guess is Martins cars picked up power because he added fuel to compensate, and there is your power gain......

Most of the cars I have seen Martin tune, mine included, where quite lean, so by adding fuel to his tune, might xplain the power gain??

Also, ethanol, being like a alchohol, should cool the inlet charge a tad better than fuel when it gets injected shouldn't it?

Just my two cents!! :D

Ethanol contains oxygen (CH3CH2OH) and therefore the fuel provides some of the oxygen required for combusion itself.

Therefore, if tuning is not altered, for the same mass of air and fuel, there will be less unused fuel in the exhaust, which will be read as a "leaner AFR".

Yes, the cooling effect you explain also sounds likely.

Yeah, that was my thinking too

One thing I can report, as you pointed out, is that the economy seems to be poorer than that attained with Mobil or BP fuel

Either that, or my attempts to test its ability has meant I have driven the car a little harder :P

So far, its hard to say if its better or not, definatley a tad cheaper, but it looks like you burn more of it, so the cost advantage kinda cancels eachother out

Anyone else tried it?

I'm thinking it would be great stuff with a das of toluene in it.........

ethanol is a good knock retardation so you can run a bit more timing

ethanol contains oxygen so more fuel is needed compare to before

overall you will use more fuel than before but produce more power from more timing advance.

Fuel consumption will depends on your right foot.

Ethanol contains oxygen (CH3CH2OH) and therefore the fuel provides some of the oxygen required for combusion itself.

Therefore, if tuning is not altered, for the same mass of air and fuel, there will be less unused fuel in the exhaust, which will be read as a "leaner AFR".

Yes, the cooling effect you explain also sounds likely.

I agree with 9krpm, the fact that Ethanol has more oxygen in it means it is has less potential to burn because it is already down the path of oxidation. Therefore more fuel is required for the same bang and the bang is smaller at the same time.

On balance, I reckon Ethanol in fuel is crap.

Toluene is good because it is hard to burn so you can then run more timing with a lower isk of pinging. It also produces a bang equivalent to or better than say straight 98 octane petrol. They say BP98 does not use aromatics (like Toluene) to achieve 98 octane, so when you do add Toluene in, the Octane rating increases more readily.

I was going to rig up a water + ethanol injection system for high boost.

The ethanol is a good knock retardant and also produce extra O2....just like NOS but not as good. A lot of people gain more power with the water + ethanol injection system by leaning the engine out a little bit more than normal. However with this fuel available from pump I don't have to worry about the plumbing work.

I think it's a great fuel and will give it a try soon. I am still worried about long distant or interstate trips. Does anyone know if this fuel is available in other states?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Stock ECU (or more accurately stock tune) absolutely refuses to go over 10psi and behaves like you have seen. The Nistune is the same if it is the stock tune. If the Nistune chip has been tuned, the resulting tune could be literally anything for any combination of parts. The Nistune just makes the stock ECU Tunable.
    • So stock ECU does not like anything above 10 psi?  That Nistune one is just for "try" if it will be any different, I know it need to be tune for that. I know but YOU may know about these problem but i/we dont. They few little Skylines here let alone people who know anything about tham so that is why iam asking here  
    • So now we have a radiator with no attachments whatsoever. It lifts up with a particularly tight spot between the drivers side air box mount and the lower radiator outlet, but if you've got this far you will sort that too. This is the lower mounts with the rad out so you can see where the rubber bushes go, it is a straight shot upwards Done! Assembly is the reverse of disassembly, with blood less likely to be shed.
    • Right, onto the second last trick. The Air Con condenser is mounted to the front of the radiator and stays in the car when the radiator is removed. There are 2x 10mm headed self tappers holding the top of the condenser to the radiator, remove those The bottom of the condenser is attached to the radiator with clips. You need to lift the condenser out of those clips and clear (up, then forward). f**ked if  could work out how to do that last bit with the front bumper on. I hope you can, and you share the trick.  Bumper removal probably deserves its own thread one day once I've recovered the will to live, but basically you need to remove the wheels, front inner guard liners (clips and 10mm headed bolts), the self tapper between the guard and the bumper at the rearmost point of the bumper (same as an R32 that bit), any remaining clips at the top/front of the grill, an absolute bastard design with a plate that holds the top of the bumper above the headlight each side (only 1 bolt which is tricky to get to, but the plate catches 2 places on the bumper and must be removed....carefully!) and push clips between the bumper and guard under the headlight. If you've done all that you will be faced with wiring for the fog lights on both sides and in ADM Q50 RS at least, 4 nasty tight plugs on the driver's side for the ADAS stuff. So, the clips at the bottom look like this on drivers side (looking from the front) And on the passenger side (also from the front), you can see this one is already out Clearance on both of these are super tight; the condenser needs to move up but the upper rad support mount prevents that, and the radiator can't move down far because it is (rubber) mounted. Once you achieve the impossible and drop the condenser off those mounts so it does not stop the rad moving, you are good to go
    • OK, next the shroud needs to come off and there are a couple of tricks. Firstly, there is a loom from near the passenger side headlight to the fans, coolant temp sensor etc and there is no plug to undo.  In my case I was OK to leave the shroud on top of the engine so I just undid the passenger side fan plug and about 10 of the clips which gave enough free wire to put it aside. The fan plugs were super tight, the trick I used was a small falt screwdriver to push down on the release tab, then a larger flat screwdriver to lever the plug out of the fan unit....be careful with how much force you apply! If you need to remove the shroud altogether for some reason you will have to deal with all the plugs (tight) and clips (brittle)....good luck. I removed all of the clips and replaced them with cable ties that I will just cut next time. Also, in the Red Sport / 400R at least, the intake heat exchanger reservoir hose is bolted to the shroud in 2 places with 10mm headed bolts; so remove them (the hose stays in the car; no need to undo it at the t fittings down at the radiator lower mount. Once you've dealt with the HX hose and the wiring loom, there are 3x 10mm headed self tappers holding the top of the shroud to the radiator; remove those.   The shroud then lifts out of the bottom mounts where it sits on the radiator, up and onto the engine out of the way. Simples
×
×
  • Create New...