Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey all just picked up some new rims for my 32, 16 inch by 8 +10 offset

and was hopein for some help with tyres sizes?

lookin for abit of stretch and open to rolling guards.

32 what?

are u after a aggressive fitment look, or just want something to fit?

hi can someone help me (nisskid) seems the expert on this topic i have r33 gtst with coilovers will 18x9 + 20 and 18x10 + 18 fit or what has to be done to fit im guessing a flare? wanting to have as agressive fitment as possible

thanks :P

perfect for an aggressive fitment, no flare needed, just roll the guards and stretch the tyres, something around a 215 on the front, and a 225 or 235 on the rear. will be nice and tight, the suspension ur running will come into play however.

Hey NISSKID good to see you running the show here..

i have just put 265/35 on 18 by 9.5 rims on my r32 and their rubbing on the rear guard; do i need to lip guards or will i get away with using different tyres?? i previously had 18 by 9.0 with 245/40 tyres and never had a problem.......!

whats doing??

help appreciated :D

Nisskid - what's your opinion on spacers? Dangerous or ok?

i've talked about spacers a lot on here, but basically what id say is they are safe if done right. that is decent size, loctite and kept hubcentric.

firstly let's establish the basics, the only thing a spacer does is introduce another mechanical connection, it DOES NOT create any extra strain on the standard hub/studs.

people mainly think spacers cause more strain on the standard hub because it creates more leverage, 2 points about this, 1: putting a spacer in there has no more effect on the standard hub then going a lower offset wheel (for instance putting a 25mm spacer on a +30 offset wheel is the same as going a +5 offset wheel). 2: if anything, ur reducing leverage in most cases as ur bringing the offset closer to 0 neutral (middle of the rim)

a spacer is effectively the same as offset, the only difference is instead of the extra metal on the mounting surface being casted on when the wheel was created, it is being connected there with a mechanical connection.

now that we have that part sorted, there are 3 factors are needed to create a safe connection.

1: the nuts maintain torque on the stud and dont loosen

2: the studs in the spacer have enough metal

3: the studs aren't subjected to much shear force

in some circumstances the wheel nuts just come loose, and since they are behind the wheel, u cant just chuck a wheel brace on and tighten them up, so some loctite is important to make sure they dont loosen. then u have the issue of smaller bolt on spacers, a 15mm spacer will only have 15mm of alloy to hold the stud in, whereas a 25mm spacer will have 25mm of alloy to hold it in, so as counterintuitive as it sounds, the bigger the better (or safer) in a lot of cases. 3rdly when the wheel isnt kept hubcentric the studs are vulnerable to shear movement as the wheel isnt being centre securely and can move around. now the friction between the mounting surfaces stops most of this movement, but i wouldnt trust it alone to stop all of the movement, id rather have a mechanical connection stopping the movement. studs are weak to shear force as they are only designed for torsional force, so they can often fail if they are subject to the shear force.

now all this (besides the 2nd point) is relevant for both bolt on and slip on spacers, slip on spacers however are a lot more vulnerable to shear force, so keeping them hubcentric is much more important.

Hey NISSKID good to see you running the show here..

i have just put 265/35 on 18 by 9.5 rims on my r32 and their rubbing on the rear guard; do i need to lip guards or will i get away with using different tyres?? i previously had 18 by 9.0 with 245/40 tyres and never had a problem.......!

whats doing??

help appreciated :D

without offset it's impossible for me to tell u, also GTS or GTR? trying to fit a 265 under stock 32 gts guards is a fair task, ull need rolled guards as a minimum, but u might be able to get away without a flare depending on the offset.

if it's already on the car, ur best bet is to simply look at it and see where it is scrubbing. personally id be dropping the suspension out and lifting the wheel up through the arc manually to see exactly where it's scrubbing, but the lazy way to do it is to find uneven ground, and try and get one side to compress up into the guard, park the car, get out and look where it's touching. either that or jack the car high, then drop one corner onto some bricks or something lol

either that or chuck up some pics and ill try and go off them.

i've talked about spacers a lot on here, but basically what id say is they are safe if done right. that is decent size, loctite and kept hubcentric.

Thanks nisskid. I'll have a chat to my garage about it.

I've got +40 offset wheels on my 33 GTST. They look good but I think there is scope for say +10 spacers to make it a bit 'fatter' w/out rolling the guards.

Skyline model - R34 GT-T

Wheel diameter - 18"

Wheel width - 8.5 [F] 9.5 [R]

Wheel offset - +30 [F] +35 [R]

Tyre size - 225/40R18 [F] 255/35R18 [R]

Suspension - Lowered ~40mm

Modifications to fit - None (Although my camber may have helped)

Hey NISSKID good to see you running the show here..

i have just put 265/35 on 18 by 9.5 rims on my r32 and their rubbing on the rear guard; do i need to lip guards or will i get away with using different tyres?? i previously had 18 by 9.0 with 245/40 tyres and never had a problem.......!

whats doing??

help appreciated :thumbsup:

Sounds like a 245 tyre is what's needed. Or like you said... lip the guards.

At +12 and 9.5in it won't be fouling on the inside, it'll be the guard.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...