Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Takz,I took some photos for you to look at this arvo.The second shows the rim with the nuts (cant get a socket in there).The thrid is is from the rear (the tyre sticking out past the guard) And the fourth, i was trying get a shot of the wishbone interfereing with the tyre, but i coudnt get enough light in there Anyway, let us know your thoughts.Cheers heaps!post-88466-0-86027000-1318849801_thumb.jpgpost-88466-0-96125600-1318849981_thumb.jpgpost-88466-0-12065800-1318850029_thumb.jpgpost-88466-0-99251300-1318850074_thumb.jpgPs i cant work out the editing of this thing. Its all over the shop.<BR><BR>

Edited by thegreentanya

Hi INASNT,

I was just wondering how you managed to fit your wheels? I have recently purchased some 18 x 10's, but didnt do enough research and after getting tyres and putting them on, have found out that they stick out way past the guards (1 & 1/2 on the back, 1" on the front) and the front tryre also interferes with the suspension wishbone. I got em off Vision R on ebay, and they were described as

Rota GR6-2R, 18 x 10, 5x114.3 +15, Skyline, Silvia Evo

..................silly me! The stud pattern is about the only thing that fits nicely, and even then i will be forced to get extended wheel nuts as the originals dont have clearance between the rim and nut to fit a socket on.

So......................no its a little late, I thought i had better finally do some research, and i gathered this skyline forum would be the ideal place to make a start. Is there any way i can do to make these work ? Is this even legal in Queensland ?, as i dont think I am allowed to have my wheels 1" & 1/2 out side of my wheel arch (it kind resembles a tractor now, and traction would no longer be a problem haha).

And lastly, if i cannot get these to work, has anyone got a project car going that would be in need of a brand new set of wheels and rubber? They are white, six spokes, Jap looking wheels, and have been coated and cleared with white/silver irradescent pearl, so they look quite nice...................spewing they dont fit!

This is the details i have:

Skyline model = R33 GTST

Wheel diameter = 18"

Wheel width = 10"

Wheel offset = +15 (pretty sure)

Tyre size = 255/40/18

Modifications to fit = ???

Any help would be GREATLY appreciated!

Cheers!

you can make these fit easy

lower the rear and get camber arms with a stretched tyre wont be an issue at all, the fronts grab some camber arms and a smaller tyre and again easy as.

not a big problem at all

Easy eh?..................I like the sounds of that! haha So would TAKZ be correct in recomending the 225s? Where do i purchase these "camber arms" you speak of, what is the going for a front and rear set, and what is invloved in lowering my car? (I must sound like a complete reatrd with all these Q's.....sorry) Thanks in advance for all your help everyone. Cheers

you can probably get away with 235/40, alot of people find 225 too much of a stretch!

lowering can be done several ways but my opinion is to get height adjustable coilovers that way if you havce the flexibility to adjust the height whenever you want, unless you already have coilovers in the car?

don't forget you'll need to get your guards rolled once you lower the car

Edited by TaKz

you can probably get away with 235/40, alot of people find 225 too much of a stretch!

lowering can be done several ways but my opinion is to get height adjustable coilovers that way if you havce the flexibility to adjust the height whenever you want, unless you already have coilovers in the car?

don't forget you'll need to get your guards rolled once you lower the car

this isnt entirely true. sure you can roll it up and down...but technically you should get an alignment done every time you move it, as it throws the geometry out (depending on how far you go)

this isnt entirely true. sure you can roll it up and down...but technically you should get an alignment done every time you move it, as it throws the geometry out (depending on how far you go)

I thought this was easy? Now i gotta get adjustable coilovers to?.........dammit, its all starting to add up haha. So in theory, 235/40's will fit without adjusting my ride height (and adding coilovers), but its gonna look like shit, is that correct? And the camber arms? Will that solve my front wishbone interference problem, or will smaller dia tyres do the trick? And what happens if i dont get the camber arms? Does that mean i will be running negative camber and chewing through tires (and money)?

Cheers

well coilovers arent much more than just getting lowered springs done with shocks, and very easy to do yourself. without lowering it will look gayer than aids, so thats something you need to take into consideration. and you will need to get it aligned then anyways, so throw them in, put em at the height you want then get them aligned.

as for the camber arms and issues, not sure man, you might just be right with the smaller tires, suspension does roll in to negative camber naturally as you lower it.but coilovers or lowered springs is a must (coilovers for adjustability whould be the best way to go.)

just thought i would add a few pics to show people where the maximum rim size/offset lies for not having to run camber to make wheels fit and still being flush with 'unpumped' guards on the rear.

So this is the rear of my R33 GTST. I have 18x9.5 rims with +38 offset. (Starcorp Racing Impuls- deep dish option) with 275/35/18 tyres on them.

This car is lowered on BC coilovers and running .5 degrees camber (i needed adjustable camber arms to achieve this after lowering the car. On standard arms the most i could get to was about 1.2 degrees).

As you can see these sit dead level with the guards with these rims n tyres. I did have to cut out the guard lip but did not 'pump' the guards at all.

Just thought this might be a good reference point for those wondering what the maximum fitment was in this ballpark without having to run camber or pumping guards.

Cheers

Justin

P.S. i won't comment on the front fitment of the Starcorp impuls as they do not sit flush with the guards (are a 18x8.5 +38)- they sit inside the guards. But what i do know is that they do not rub in any way shape or form with a 235/35/18 tyre and on lowered suspension.

post-68049-0-48319800-1319523000_thumb.jpg

post-68049-0-52032400-1319523054_thumb.jpg

post-68049-0-57260300-1319523060_thumb.jpg

post-68049-0-78082800-1319523065_thumb.jpg

Edited by jjman

nah i prefer to actually get power down as opposed to going for the cambered, stretched tyre look :thumbsup:

n with the front wheels sitting inside the guards n the rears sitting out where they are with no camber n the big tyres gives it a drag car look. Im happy with that :cheers:

Just wondering why your wheels arnt sticking out past the gaurd in the rear like mine. I have the same offset etc on the rear. Is it because its lowered with camber arms?? Cheers.

18 x 9 +15 (fronts) and 18 x 10 +15 (rears) - pictures as promised :)

29oki7d.jpg

11jastu.jpg

Just wondering why your wheels arnt sticking out past the gaurd in the rear like mine. I have the same offset etc on the rear. Is it because its lowered with camber arms?? Cheers.

Easy answer to that one - I had the rears flared and pumped out another 40 mm. I'm also running camber (-2.2 degrees) which I will be getting readjusted as that's a bit aggressive. I was just playing around with the camber settings and started off with 2.2 - I'll most likely be running -1.8 degrees which will sit just a little out from flush.

Oh and sorry, I am running after market camber arms (I think the brand is "hardrace") which I bought from Just Jap in Kirrawee. The reviews for that brand were good so I decided to go with them.

Tyres I'm running are 235/40/18s for the rear and 225/40/18s for the fronts.

Edited by spacepants_fb

Looks nice!!! What size tyres?

Also why does your front bumper look bent?

I believe front is genuine/replica GTR item 'massaged' to fit a GTST.

Hahaha...good eye mate! Yeah it is slightly bent and malformed at the bottom of the bumper. The car came with this front bumper when I originally bought it from Kujotk who is (i think) still an active member on SAU. And unfortunately, it isn't a genuine GTR item as Nav suggested - it is a fibreglass bar that was designed as a replacement front bar for a GTR. When it was fitted on the car, it was a little too wide and so after a few driveway scrapes it started to produce the bend that you can see.

On the wings is a replacement bar and possibly a respray so at this stage I will just run it until it's time to get the respray done.

And tyre size question answered on my previous post. :)

Edited by spacepants_fb
  • 3 weeks later...

Hey All,

i have spent the last 45 mins going through all 78 pages of this thread lol and i cannot find any obvious combos with these sizes

I am looking to put these on my R33 GTST which has full height adj suspension but nothing else. I would like to avoid rolling the guards if I can but will if i have to.

19x9 +38

19x9.5 +45

Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.

yeah that should fit no worries as long as you dont intend to dump it 'hektic styles'.

Tho im more thinking in terms of 18's so im not sure how much of a difference 19's would make.

At stock ride height my 33 gtst took 18x9.5's +36 with 265/35/18's on and didnt touch the rear guards. (did when lowered tho)

All things being equal tho. Be open to needing to cut/roll ur rear guard. Its no big issue if done right and offset never looks quite right unless the tyre is in the range of rubbing where that rear guard/lip is...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...