Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Skyline model = 1998 R34 GT-t

Wheel model = Blitz (not sure what model exactly, all I know is that they are 3-piece, and 5 spoke)

Wheel diameter = 18

Wheel width = Front 8.5, Rear 9.5

Wheel offset = Not entirely sure, picture attached though

Tyre size = Front 245/40, Rear 265/35

Modifications to fit = Again, not sure (was on the car when I got it...)

Well, that was my OLD set up (accident = damaged wheels = need to buy a new set!)

Which brings me to me to a question!

Getting some Enkei RP03s, and looking at the following:

Fronts - 18 x 8.5, +30

Rears - 18 x 9, + 18

Any thought on whether this will work?

There is a 18 x 10, +22 option aswell.

Any thoughts appreciated!

post-66054-0-09604000-1336356401_thumb.jpg

Edited by James34

Go the 9+18 all round

Was thinking that. Would there be any issues with this on the fronts? (i.e. any modifications required, wheels poking out etc)

Don't think there would be any issue with the rears...

  • 2 weeks later...

So im considering getting some work xd9s for my 33 gtst its at stock height atm

but i plan on getting coilovers first to lower it a bit,

just wondering what the xd9s in 18x8 + 28, and 18 x 9 + 20/30 would sit like

on the car, and if theres much gaurd work to be done, i dont mind rolling but not too

keen on the flaring, dont really like how it looks on 33 guards.

and not too sure i want to go 18 x9, 18 x 10 which ive seen most people getting

So im considering getting some work xd9s for my 33 gtst its at stock height atm

but i plan on getting coilovers first to lower it a bit,

just wondering what the xd9s in 18x8 + 28, and 18 x 9 + 20/30 would sit like

on the car, and if theres much gaurd work to be done, i dont mind rolling but not too

keen on the flaring, dont really like how it looks on 33 guards.

and not too sure i want to go 18 x9, 18 x 10 which ive seen most people getting

xd9's look best in

17x9.5 + 17 front 18x10 + 18 rear

the design of xd9's really need the biggest sizes for the bigger lip to look good.

you could do this without flaring the guards. you will need to pump them a little or use camber.

would probably run 235' fr and 245 r

Hey everyone just wanna quickly figure out if a set of wheels will fit my car without too much scrubbing..

They are 17x8 & 17x9 work cr Kai's with +38 offset..

My car is pretty low with teins coil overs and I'm running r32 gtr rims with no scrubbing at all any Ideas if these ones above will scrub or will I need to modify the guards?

Cheers

Looking at new wheels for my Gtt, Im putting a gtr front end on, What would be best for the front? Would 17x9 +22 all round suit or would if be better to get 18's to fill the guards? x9 +22 is fine on the rear? Car is not stupid low just on legal height.

Looking at new wheels for my Gtt, Im putting a gtr front end on, What would be best for the front? Would 17x9 +22 all round suit or would if be better to get 18's to fill the guards? x9 +22 is fine on the rear? Car is not stupid low just on legal height.

Stupid low is way cool. :domokun:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...