Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

under the new scheme joe blogs cant bring in a car he has to get someone with the complince of the car he wants to bring it in in for him if it has slight damage it has to go straight to the panel shop before it can be complied once at the complience shop if it has any goodies they get taken off and the car gets complied as standed once complied the car can be sold as standard or with the the goddies BUT THE CAR HAS TO BE SOLD STANDED FIRST AND THE COMPLIENCER CANT PUT THE GODDIES ON IN THE SHOP THAT HE COMPLIED THE CAR.I allso heard that compliencing will start off at $4000 plus tyres.

Its all very up in the air for the next few months as to how it will work out.. nowhere have i seen a very definitive answer unfortunately. What is will do with amongst all the confusion is stop people importing, which to me is a large (hidden) reason for the changes. Too many powerful cars at too cheap a price, who would buy a local 2nd hand "local" car for over $10k these days? when most the time for the $ you get an import that is superior in nearly every respect? It kills the 2nd local hand market, so as you can see there would be a lot of pressure on government by various people in parts of the local industry to stamp that out.

Apparently as they ship quite a few cars to Australia (have no idea what it is in % terms of total).. you would think a few japanese workshops would move in to benefit the scheme...

1. Buy modded cars at auction or preauction.

2. Fit standard parts for $ which they can build huge stocks of locally.

3. Sell you the car at premium and ship you the extra parts for $ later, or sell separately.

4. They win and make good $ on every account

The japanese are good business people (as we all know).. and as their economy isn't going too great. Actually shit i just had a business idea (see you in japan :D ) What am i missing???

greygirl1976: hmm, not sure whether i follow that.

Originally posted by Diablo_2097

oh, and someone else said that you don't need compliancing for 15 year old cars now, is that true, or is it just that you can get them complianced with mods

It's not true to say that a 15+ car doesn't need 'compliance' - what it doesn't need is a compliance plate, BUT it still has to 'comply' with the ADR's that were applicable in the year the car was built. In Vic an engineers inspection and certificate is required (approx $500) on top of the mods needed (intrusion bars, unleaded filler, seat belts, child anchor points, etc). Also Vicroads will want to inspect the car for themselves - costs nothing they can demand more work if not satisfied. A car with lots of mods might be given a bit more scrutiny....

Originally posted by greygirl1976

under the new scheme joe blogs cant bring in a car he has to get someone with the complince of the car he wants to bring it in in for him if it has slight damage it has to go straight to the panel shop before it can be complied once at the complience shop if it has any goodies they get taken off and the car gets complied as standed once complied the car can be sold as standard or with the the goddies BUT THE CAR HAS TO BE SOLD STANDED FIRST AND THE COMPLIENCER CANT PUT THE GODDIES ON IN THE SHOP THAT HE COMPLIED THE CAR.I allso heard that compliencing will start off at $4000 plus tyres.

are you on drugs?

hers some facts for you guys.

im at theh 2nd stage of the 3 stage process.

i have passed stage 1 and stage 2 audit,so i am now virtually iso9001,im awaiting the inspection of my sample vehicle from the people in canberra and then we can start importing and complying.

vehicle must be standard,incl bodykits,exhaust etc,etc and have no history of damage.

when a import application is sent to canberra it has to have auction report and a signed declaration from the seller in japan listing non standard items and previous accident repairs.

under the previous cpa system,all cars were supposed to be standard also,but was never inforced,yet to be seen if this will be the case under the new system.

but we have been told random checks from canberra are likely.

costs will definately be higher,the labour and paperwork are considerably more,for instance new genuine brake pads $320,carbon cannister-$250 etc.

at this stage it looks like we may have to invest $15k on a epa type noise tester.

  • 9 months later...

Import Market is pretty much confusing for everyone at the moment

Some of you guys already mentioned that imports are killing the Local Second hand Market Which I Agree with, Also .Government to stop import Process I also Agree with that Partly

My Point of View is Imports will not %100 stop but they will be more expensive in near Future so if you really want one you pay the Price for it.

I Guess Government's Main Concern is Local $ getting Exported (not staying in the country) However They are Still Making Money from %10GST & %15Duty Altough registered importers can claim the GSt Back this is out of the question for private importers, also Don't Forget LCT extra cash for Government.

As Some of you may Already Know Yes the car has to go straight to complier out of the wharf, & Complier in case of Not Loosing his/her license will do the best they can & You will have to fork out for it, seriously importing modified cars unless 15years old is out of the question .

I Believe This is fair, Government had to come up with something to stop the backyarders, every tom dick & Harry were importing rust Buckets Halfcuts, Clocked Back crap etc (No Offence for Genuine Importers )

From Now on you hold on the what you got

Get a Genuine Car & Keep it

That's the way I See it

I Hope I don't offend anyone out there these are just my thoughts..

Thank you..

Way to go with digging an ancient thread..

My car was imported already modified by the previous owner.. thousands of dollars of stuff on there. If the option was ever available I'd prefer to bring in a modified car, but of course that isn't now possible. In fact, I probably wouldn't bother importing myself these days unless it was like a car that was fairly new anyhow (R34 GT-T, latter model R33 GTR) or something very specific I was after. Seeing as it has to be stock, it better be good in stock form.

Importing a stock R33 GTS-T for $18k isn't too attractive to me, and if I wanted to modify it another $10k to even get it handling and performing half decently. Now things such as 180sx, s13, R33, R32 and things just aren't worth importing if you ask me as there is too much locally at equivelent prices. You end up paying more to import basically so unless you're looking at around the $30k bracket hardly seems worthwhile. So the government has already done what it set to acheive, and and that is kill the demand.

Already specialist importers that were doing a booming trade before the RAWS scheme, and those dealers that were starting to offer a few imports in conjunction with their regular 2nd hand stock, seem to be less and less these days. So already they have helped destroy a few businesses (whether possibly shonky or otherwise).

Thing is government makes a hell of a lot more money on a 2nd hand import, compared to the sale of a local car.. but still they want to kill it.. stupid ****s :P

Just remember this come federal election time folks!

Given that the application of option 1 will probably have the opposit effect to that which DOTARS claims it wants to achieve you could assume that they are working to an agenda that they are not publishing. They will have the full support of the Major car companies and other interested parties. The opposition from the general public and majority of import car owners or wouldbe owners will be pathetic. The government and regulising bodies appear to be turning a blind eye to DOTARS blatent use of lies and misinformation.

I feel pretty sure that option 1 will be the one.

" Australia is a nation of sheep....and most of them live in cities around the coast"

51jay: I'd definitely agree with you there. In 10 years when young people are still driving 25 year old hotted up S13 around and they're still selling for $10k, then we'll have our lovely government to blame.

Well at least I know I did make an effort and sent in a submission.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...