Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

reverted cookie domain to .skylinesaustralia.com (just then) as I'm doing some tests to see if the gallery logging in issue can be fixed easily.

please let me know if that breaks anything.

Funky mate i cleared all my cookies and all that like you have said an i still get logged out every time i close the browser... Is there anything else i need to be doing to fix the problem??

Using FireFox 1.0.4

Security i imagine is just default…

Cheers

Matt

There's no persistence..

You will notice sau cookies are not being stored on your computer.

I'm going to have a read of Invision Powerboard docs and see if I can shed any light.

Edited by Cubes

http://docs.invisionpower.com/kb/article.php?id=163

I'm assuming you would have to set the cookie domain to

.skylinesaustralia.com

note the full stop prior to skylinesaustralia.com

The cookie path should not be set to anything, such as /forums/

The cookies are also required at the root www.skylinesaustralia.com address.

EDIT: hrmm something has changed recently.. well kind of recently..

I am now showing cookies saved.

I've had a look at the cookie path. It is set to /forums

You will notice if you browse www.skylinesaustralia.com it won't store the login details.

Browse www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums and the cooking info is store.

Edited by Cubes

Its happening to me now too. I think someone who knows what they are looking at can probably sort it but my 2 yen is that there must be a cookie problem on the new site.

most likely I havent had a trouble on the new site until to today because i had a cookie from the old forums. presumably it is now expired and I have to log on each time

I noticed cookies were being retained around 7:40 tonight.

Both IE and Mozilla are fine.

I've cleared cookies and logged in, persistence is definitely now working.

I've also noticed the cookie path has been set back to root (from /forum). Everything is now working 100%.

Main web page and forums that is. :huh:

If your having issues clear what ever skylinesaustralia cookies there are and re-login.

Edited by Cubes

can you test the gallery as well to see if it accesses the same cookies. Also log out and clear cookies then try logging in at the gallery and see if the cookie is used by the main forum?

that really dosen't achieve anything. If you have a solution that'll help others, share it, if you have nothing good to contribute to the thread, then just stay out of it.

Let's just say "cookie" and "restrictions" and "packet alocation" :)

Just use opera....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to !
    • As I've said elsewhere, I am using the stock intercooler piping path in the engine bay, and a return flow cooler, and making ~250 rwkW (without any effort put into trying to turn it up past there just yet) and expect to be able to make some more, and frankly, I would be perfectly happy with 260-270rwKW. This is peak road Skyline usability territory. You go past there and, sure, the car will snap necks more when it's on boost, but it will also break shit all the time, cost a (even larger) fortune in tyres, etc etc. Anyway, I also do not like the over-the-fan pipe path, and you don't have to do it.
    • I see, honestly I’m not too fussed about the looks. The only reason to go plenum is to make the piping easier instead of the classic over the rad etc. 
    • Not easy to quantify wrt something like how many fractions of a second slower it would be over 0-100. But given that a 250-300rwkW car is able to do that launch sprint in 5-6 sec (and faster with appropriate tyres, and surface)..... giving up as much as a second would feel like torture. A ~450HP capable turbo is not going to make lots of boost in the 2000-3000 rpm range. So, whilst with some boost on hand it will be faster accelerating in that rev range than your engine currently is NA, it will not feel like a fast car until the boost is solidly in. You know what your car feels like right now when you open it up at 2000rpm. if you've ever been in an actual fast car, you will appreciate that the NARB25 is.... not exciting. Well, add some boost and it will be better. But shorten the intake runners and it might not be better at all. It might come out better, but it could end up feeling the same. For me, it's not the 0-X km/h sprints that matter. It is easy to fry the tyres with anything over 200 rwkW. You can't use all the power available in 1st and 2nd anyway, you have to modulate the throttle. What matters is how the car reacts when you're driving in traffic in 4th or 5th and have maybe 2000 rpm on board, and you want/need to add some speed quickly, and don't have time for the downshift. It won't make boost, it will be all NA (at the speeds we're talking about - remember how fast you're going at 2000 in 4th! and don't plan on breaking the limit by too much.) So giving away NA torque is not what I would consider practical for a street car. And retaining that NA torque builds boost faster which makes the car faster. The flashy plenum is not actually better, unless you're looking at a track car where you can keep it on the boil all the time.  
    • So how much difference does it make you think? Like 1 second in the 0-100?  I was have smaller turbo so hopefully that spools quick GTX2871.  currently it’s NA so you can imagine pretty slow, but I do want fast accusation a little as there’s not many places I’ll be driving where I go over 80 even near me. So 0-60 and 0-80 targets   
×
×
  • Create New...