Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 186
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 2 weeks later...

nick:look too the left

name: Matty.

location: vic in spirit.

Car: R33 Gtst.

email: [email protected]

Msn: Same.

Likes: Long talks, candlelit dinners, slow dancing in the rain, oprah show, watching the sunset over the ocean, holding hands, cuddles. :)

also no pic. lol

How did I miss this thread?

Nick: rs73

Name: Rianto

Age: 30 (soon!)

Location: Fairfield/Thornbury

Car: R33 GTS-t

email: [email protected]

MSN: as above

ICQ: 873042

Pic:

Chopped off group pic taken @ my office...

Nick: MaXiMuS

Name: Max

Location: Brighton/Caulfield

Car: R33 GTSt

E-mail/MSN: [email protected]

ICQ: 12606043 (haven't used it for about 2 years)

http://homepages.ihug.com.au/~lymax/max.jpg

car2.jpg

Myself and my ride!

  • 2 weeks later...

NAME: Dan

NICK: DANS-GT-R31

AGE: 21

LOCATION: My Evelyn

CAR: 1989 Nissan Skyline Silhouette RB30E

MODS INT: Mild cam, head work, lightened flywheel, 2 1/4'' zorst

MODS EX: Full-sick re-spray redsilver with gold pearl full GTS-R bodykit

here is a new pic of my beast, I am walking to the LEFT of my car!

Originally posted by DANS-GT-R31

here is another pic of my car and also some R31 SKYLINE CLUB members.....

/me hides :)

Thanks Dan!

Just for that, I'm gonna include a couple that missed out in that last pic (hehe)

I found this pic of Danzbeast (a.k.a Dan, white GX) on the left and Skaface (a.k.a Gazza, grey Ti) on the right.

Please don't kill me guys!

  • 2 weeks later...

Name: Douglas

Nick: Any variation of the above... and Phorj (forge) for some strange reason?

Car: Black R33 GTS25t

Location: Templestowe/Doncaster (Inner-Eastern Suburbs)

eMail/MSN: [email protected] / [email protected]

soz for no pics... just stock anyway, and don't have a digicam!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...