Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Mirko mate on the flipside to what everyone's saying: there are good tuners, but that doesn't mean they'll always do a good job.

I tried to do my research, find a tuner who was well recommended..their interpretation of a 'safe' tune = knock levels through the roof, and when I asked for my AFRs a week later they fobbed me off. (It wasn't CRD by the way).

Sorry about to hear about your engine though, is C&V doing the rebuild/tune?

just to give some insight into what casue JETT to fail at the last WSID meet, after many weekes of waiting the engine is out and motor was stripped, not long after the bottom end was apart we found NO#5 piston cracked all the way down the side, and after taking the piston to many workshops all experts have decided and confirmed that the piston only cracked due to the TUNE being very very  lean and detonation caused the piston to crack

If that was a piston from one of our race motors, my first question would not have been about tuning. I would have been far more interested in looking at the data log of what happened in the last few minutes of the engine's life. The old truth serum (logged data) doesn't lie.

;) cheers :)

Admin

This thread is a joke, I believe I have said this a number of times before about this sort of thing........threads like this should not be allowed.

I was at CRD that day and at the drag day. Saw JETT up close....IMHO....I'm not surprised you broke it. The car is rough. Nothing to do with CRD. Wreakedhead please control yourself, you are an embarrassment.

Why dont you mention that i strongly recommended to you that the need to have a nos rpm limit switch so that the nos wouldnt be turned on at very low rpm and cause a backfire and high rpm limit to prevent the nos running incase the vehicle runs on the rpm limit of the ecu.What about the thermostatically controlled nos bottle warmer that you were told you needed to prevent nos pressures varying from 700psi to over 1000psi,a whopping 30 percent variation at the nos nozzle (delivery to the engine).

Jim Souvas

CRD

Tech Engineer

Nobody mentioned anything to me about a NOS rpm limit switch, or i would have put it in on the day,, and as for the nos bottle warmer I already had a thermstatically controlled bottle warmer befor i came to the shop and after i got there and the bottle was installed by your mechanics, the so called thermostat mysteriously broke, anyways i checked the bottle pressure everytime i turned it on and warmed it up, it never went over 850psi. there was no 30percent variation in bottle pressure as i kept it under strick control..

Why dont you add the fact that you picked up the car on friday nightthen on saturday when i saw you againi asked you about the cars performance and you mentioned you had tried it and it was fine.

well i drove the car on the day to day tune you did for me and like i said it was fine, but i had not driven the car on the race tune casue i didint have a chance to race yet.

why dont you mention the fact you ran the car without nos on the first pass (low 11 sec run)next run you forget to turn on the awd and ran with nos staying on the rev limiter for sometime before backing off.Its all well and good to point fingers and lay blame to others,but unfortunately you only have yourself to blame

firstly just to clarify i never ever do a burn out on the limiter, I strickly always hold it about 6-7k, as for the the second pass and not putting the awd switch back on, i accept resonsability for that in forgetting but popping the clutch and changing through first and second gear then backing off, isnt likely to crack a piston i dont think.

If i recall correctly all you wanted to do was run the car on sunday so you could then sell ti ASAP.(palm it off to some poor unsuspecting person)I also recall you personally bagging the shit out of some of the other shops you have dealt with in the past so i does not suprise me that you started a thread like this and yeah why didnt you/havent you approached us and show us the components you are referring to and tell us what you found.

Everyone on this site knows im trying to sell my car, and everyone knows i was racing on the day, running a great pass would have been excellent, and palming it off to some poor unexpecting person wouldnt have made a differnce casue everyone knows who i am and where im from, Ive always mentioned the car was stock and never stated anything else, so as far as that goes unsuspecting wouldnt be the word i would use in this case. as for bagging the shit out of some of the other shops that ive dealt with in the past, I recall on the day i said that ive been to C and V befor and they used the power fc hand controller to tune my car and i wanted to try someone that used the datalogic to try and see if i can get a better tune, unfortunatly casue my power fc wasnt compatible with your software we procceded to tune with hand controler, i think thats where you have made your mistake in thinking i was bagging them out. If you are interested in seeing the piston that cracked its not a problem i can ship that over to you with no problems what so ever so you canhave a look yourself.

also to be honest with you jim, i dont care what people write on the forums, im just stating what happend to me, and thats it, i dont want or need any money, nor am i asking for anything from you, I belive SAU forum gives people the right to say what they feel and also mention performance workshops they have visited and dealt with, being good or bad. so if this thread gets closed or deleted ill know that SAU is bias towards people and members can only write /talk about what suits the admins,

Sorry wreckedhead but that setup on a stock motor sounds like a receipe for disaster...

By what Jim is saying, he advised you on what needed to be done to help prolong engine life but you just ignored him...

You can't blame the tuner. They provided you with a service you asked for and then advised you on what needed to be done to assist it but sounds like you ignored them....No use pointing the finger!!

Anyone good luck with the engine rebuild.

I belive SAU forum gives people the right to say what they feel and also mention performance workshops they have visited and dealt with, being good or bad. so if this thread gets closed or deleted ill know that SAU is bias towards people and members can only write /talk about what suits the admins,

No forum gives anyone the 'right' to say anything bad about any company.

If Christian wants to delete this thread he's just protecting himself from any potential litigation from CRD.

Forums aren't exactly 'sounding boards' for peoples various grievances.

T.

I have seen jims work up close on a friends civic that made huge power... his tuning is top notch... Nothing wrong with it. He has been trusted with engines worth more than yours and hes delivered the goods many times.

From what I can see in this thread, you got what you asked for - caveat emptor.

Its your problem mate - not Jims.

Edited by MattSR
I belive SAU forum gives people the right to say what they feel and also mention performance workshops they have visited and dealt with, being good or bad. so if this thread gets closed or deleted ill know that SAU is bias towards people and members can only write /talk about what suits the admins,

The only bias we have is protecting Christian from any possible legal action that someone takes against him as owner/operator of SAU, from any individual who sees slanderous / libellous remarks.

Think it won't happen? It has happened before in Australia to other forums - overclockers.com.au for one were shut down for a while after a business took them to court following an unhappy writeup.

There's no problem with freedom of speech here. Unfortunately if someone slags off a business, Christian is responsible for what they say in the end.

That's why there is no problem with mentioning good workshops, but if you've had a bad experience try and keep it via PM, away from any potential problems.. :)

Guest DIRTgarage

Was it you who requested Jim to push the car harder to make 1KW more than us........just so you could have a brag figure??

I dont like to ever say bad things about the quailty of people's cars and how rough they are

so I wont!

Edited by DIRTgarage

I say let air out all the dirty laundry, But honestly on that stock set up with a t88/nos.LOL. What was going through your mind?

I've built and done a few motors in the past, but I'm still come to term with what you're trying to achieve, and then distance yourself from any liability. I've never dealt with CRD for that matter, but the instruction to tune the car to the X amount has to come from someone, and I hardly believe a workshop would risk blowing a motor up and chancing with the associated headaches.

Have the big end bearings been looked at by anyone? It's another way of trying to look into the history/life of the motor before it die.

i don't see any problem with this thread wreckedhead has stated his problem and his thoughts on it, and CRD have provided their side of what happend. i don't think it will do any great harm to anyone. if it was all one sided then for sure, close it. but at least in this case CRD have had their say.

Seriously man pull your bloody head in, If you expect a Motor to last pushing 429rwkw with NOS and STOCK INTERNAL running C16, you really have no idea.

If you ask a workshop to tune your car for max performance they will, But its up to you make sure you motor can handle it.

As for the Air fuels they are fine for a motor that is built properly and isn’t running stock cast pistons. Ever head of the Term “FORGED PISTONS” they are a great investment.

What do you expect, you run a stock motor at 429kw and its going to last you all day every day for the next 10 years ???? Once you start pushing the limit of a stock motor it’s going to start breaking things. It ain’t rocket science.

I just grabbed a Cascade as well...

I am actually VERY impressed that CRD managed to get that much out of the engine and for it to last as long as it did, even on "Street Tune"

The fact is the ring lands should have been the first to go melty melty, so the tune appears to be within a realm of somewhat safe...

A cracked piston is a usually indication of something going horribly wrong at a certain point in time, and having Nos this would be almost positively one of the MAJOR contributing factors...that and the fuel cut limiter...

To be honest, if I had a stock engine producing that much power, and looking at the AFR's, I would have already saved money and parts for the full rebuild...albeit that I would have done it in the first place.

At the end of the day tuners follow what you want as a customer, they also let you know, and are obliged to do so, what safety margin there is, also what can go wrong (no one can predict when) and what precautions you should make.

Shit happens...I had a piston ring collapse, on an engine that had done 40,000km log book klms...I think you should be counting your lucky stars!!!

Edited by Bobjones

man i thought your car would have had a rebuild and froged internals to run that power

but..wow shit..no nothing...

i think that's 1 of th things

eventhough the tune maybe spot on...

the engine will not last long as it will be under so much stress

like i said befor im not looking for anything other then to state what i was told by 4 differnt workshops, all said the tune caused the piston to crack, im not a mechanic but if the shoe fits, what can i say.

of course its illegal to mention online in a public forum to everybody when these incidents occur.

keeps everybody nice and in the dark, and not able to make up their own minds about these incidents.

i love it.

It is afterall his own personal opinion, nothing more.

With a thread like this and getting this long and it did take CRD a few post to get on it, the admin needs to place a note at the start of the thread saying that it is 1 persons comment and should be read in full. I think that peoples comments are good in forums like this but when they can sound damming people need to know the whole story and not read the the first post only.

Hey Mirko all problems aside I think you can look at a couple of things..

1/ You drove the car by yourself to an awesome time

2/ That's a shitload of power, and for a stock bottom end it's maybe too much cylinder pressure for cast pistons

3/ Using a single fogger system can create variations in mixture distributions, as you cannot dictate where the nitrous and fuel are going to end up. Could have been something as small as too much gas/not enough fuel in one cylinder.

All in all congrats on doing a good time, on a stock bottom end motor making a shitload of power.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...