Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'd have one...

I reckon there'll be a few more exploding gearboxes because

1. already increased torque loading (though they've strengthened the box)

2. an extra .5L swept capacity will help a bigger turbo spool faster (similar to the RB20 and RB25) that will allow greater HP potential easier

They're going to keep the Skyline boys honest, that's for sure

I'd have one...

I reckon there'll be a few more exploding gearboxes because

1. already increased torque loading (though they've strengthened the box)

2. an extra .5L swept capacity will help a bigger turbo spool faster (similar to the RB20 and RB25) that will allow greater HP potential easier

They're going to keep the Skyline boys honest, that's for sure

The 6 speed gearboxes aren't having problems with highly modified STi's that have been getting around the performance scene for over two years.

I'm 100% confident they won't have gearbox issues.

Should be interesting to see the new Evo vs STi comparisons.

This is good news for RB25DET owners. the US spec 2.5L STi uses high impedance side feed 440cc injectors, that fit straight in our fuel rails. I'd expect we'll get the same.Ripper B) The chief reason for going 2.5L in the States was to meet CARB (California) emissions standards - the toughest in the world. They must be selling very well over there.

When I was in the states the petrol is at best 91 octane is this the same octane measurement as ours.  Their lowest grade was 87!

We use the RON (Research octane number) measurement, americans use RON+ MON / 2. Where MON is the Motor octane number.

I believe their 91 is around our 98.

I reckon the rear lights look cheap.

I'm sure the 2003 to current model WRX rear lights should drop in (and you'd find some ricer 2003 - 2005 model peson who'd want to swap) - the sheet metal at the rear hasn't changed AFAIK

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Legend. I ended up finding the facebook account of the owner of the first car i sent but sadly he deactivated the account. I think you’re right in saying it’s some sort of well done custom job. Really appreciate your help anyways.
    • Totally equivalent. Stock often goes from the comp cover because that's where the actuator is also installed and the factory needs 2" of hose to make the connection - and it comes as a pre-assembled unit. They totally have a boost reference from somewhere between the turbo and the throttle(s). Oh, jeez. Just do it in M12 then. We don't actually care that much. I would expect any such AN converter fitting to rely on an o-ring or some other seal onto a flat surface under the flange of the hex**, because bolt threads are no intended to provide a pressure seal. unlike..... pipe threads. **which also requires a suitably flat and smooth surface on the turbo's boss to provide the seal.
    • I also used NP   That’s were it’s seems to be the best place to fit it? All schematic shows also that it’s should be referenced from the turbo housing. But idk, I do see high hp cars without any connection or anything to their turbos, so I really don’t know how they connect their things
    • I do have loctite 243 and 246 and a few more models. I could drill it now in place and make new threads for m12 and order an4 - m12 coupling and fit that to the turbo. Run a braided hose to the EBC which I could get a an4 to 1/8npt 
    • So M12 and sealant should be fine?    NPT ” because that’s what I had and what I could get atm. 
×
×
  • Create New...