Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi everyone

am looking to get an electronic boost controller but would like some guidance in what to get abd what features to look for.

i dont want anything fancy or complicated. i looked at the turbosmart e-boost2 and it looks all too hard - i just want to set 2 or 3 boost settings and be done with it.

any suggestions?

I have a DSBC. I upgraded from a SSBC.

These are the predessesors to the SBC Spec S and SBC Spec R respectively.

I found the dual solenoid to be significantly better. I would recommend that one. If I was buying new I would buy the blitz dual solenoid model, which is NOT SPEC S. The dual model is Spec R.. Spec S is single!

When installing it make sure you have all hoses as short as possible and if your car isn't tuned for boost check the settings on the dyno!

I have the DSBC spec R as mentioned above

dual solonoid holds boost perfectly and it has 4 files to set boost and gain...

I drive it daily with the ebc turned off and turn it on when I want to run 10psi

You can pick them up pretty cheaply now and may be a more cost effective option than some of the newer offerings... it doesn't have a nice flashy screen but then again it is easier to hide;)

Just thought i would put some input for apexi

Hay mate i just brought an avc-r and it is total sweet. You can fully control you ramp speed, which allows you to have full control over your boost. It boost very fast and if it overshoots it is only by 0.02 of a bar, which is bugger all in the big picture. I got mine of gR33ddy it was $660 delivered and is black, which blends in with the rest of the surroundings in the car. I wired it all up my self very very hung over and was quite simple if you have a little bit of mechanical and electrical knowledge you too will find it simple and rewarding.

Hope this helps.

If you need assistance in installing it (if you get one) PM me.

Boz

Someonestolecc is spot on. The Blitz TwinSBC is real easy, & it just works. Button goes in...high boost. Button goes out...low boost. Homer Simpson could operate it.

MrZac is selling one, snap it up. I'm wishing I hadn't sold mine to cc now ! :)

What about the new I colour from blitz? At first I thought it was a gimmic for more $$$ but reading a short blurb on it it supposedly comes with functions to show water temp/ oil temp/ oil pressure/ fuel pressure and a/f ratio? If it controls boost effectively as well the price tag doesnt seem too bad.

Yeah Blitz DSBC/SBC Type R, Greddy Profec B1 or Profec B2 would be the ones I'll get.

ProfecB1 if you're especially after simplicity, just wire it up and adjust the knobs. One for Hi boost, one for Low boost and the other one to control gain.

ProfecB2 is very similar to the DSBC although DSBC has 4 settings where as B2 only has 3. Both have gain control, display real-time boost with peak & warning function, twin/two solenoids.

I'd get one of those 3 if I had the money. :ph34r: Haha turbotech MBC for me.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...