Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

"3 your fuel pump is not dying? it happened to me and it confuses the ecu showing a/f is good but it's actually constantly retarding timing and i only reached no more than 150rwkw till i replaced the fuel pump. "

This strikes me as possible.

i assume i attach a t piece with a pressure guage to test the fuel pump. I'm getting good economy and it doesnt miss at all when i floor it.

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

What plugs are you running?

The top end looks as if its flattening out a little, that could be due to the plugs, it could also be due to a restriction in the exhaust or as some one else mentioned wheel spin on the dyno.

If power had not have flattened out it would be up around 148rwkw.

I do agree though, that power figure is embarrasing. :)

150rwkw doesn't feel fast anyway, its only once you are up around 200rwkw it starts feeling fast.

My 176rwkw felt slow even though it was making 100 of those rwkw by ~2000rpm. This was run in 4th but only taken to ~6000rpm due to it not making any more power after 5000rpm. Torque dip in the middle is wheel spin.

Edited by Cubes
wow great result there. does the full exhaust include dump pipe?

Yeah its got a dumper, but i believe the muffler is very restrictive (its not even a straight thru). I'm running coppers that mercury gapped down to help my ailing coilpacks, which are on the way out :)

You guys believe dyno figures too much.

Example... my stock R33 GTS-T with a cat back exhaust and aftermarket fuel pump was dyno'd within a week at two places.

Unique Auto Sports = 156.1rwkw

Castle Hill Exhausts = 140.2rwkw

Nothing on the car had changed and same batch of fuel.

Goto agree with Tommo, main reason why you should always get your car dyno'd at the same place, providing they don't change their setup, you atleast will have figures relavant to previous ones that are accurate..

although - goto say <140 sounds quite low..

Guys i seem to have miraculously fixed this problem.

By the push in the back im guessing ive just gained an extra 30-40kw!

It was a leak on one of the smaller hoses going to the inlet manifold causing the disturbing whistle at high rpm, and also must have been sapping the power.

i will still get it dynoed, but the car is running smoooth as, and fast!

I'll keep youse up to date.

Great stuff mate, very good to hear it was a simple fix.

I'm suprised the guys dyno'ing it didn't notice :P

That said though, I didn't even think that was a incorrect figure, rather a slightly out dyno... but you've proved me wrong :D

Edited by TommO

Guys Guys Guys

I have read so much in the forum about Power figures I think it is quite strange that noone has done there homework on this

A stock GTS-t R33 makes 180-185kw at the flywheel which equates to a LOT less at the wheels.

A stock car will make approxx 120-130 HP at the wheels which is 88-95kw at the wheels. This I know because i have seen my car which was completly stock when i bought it and in fantasic condition and i have gone down the road of modifacation.

My car has now produced 210 HP at the wheels which equates to 154kw which is starting to become a nice street car I have a Hiflow Turbo coming and a SAFC tune on the way. I completly fail to see how the figures that you guys are talking 200rwkw with a stock dump pipe I cant help but feel that this is a crock of shit 200kw equates to 271hp

Which u JUST CANT GET with a stock dump PIPE I had to go for a aftermarket dump pipe when i hit 185-190 hp at the wheels. I think someone is telling porky's

I will probably get flamed for this.

Guys if you think i'm talking crap Google the standard power figures and make your conclusion.

http://www.digitaldutch.com/unitconverter/

Drivetrain loss is roughly 30% I thought. Ie stock R33 gts-t with 185kw at the fly will be roughly 130rwkw. R32 gts-t with 160 will be 110. Works for me. I think everyone in this thread was talking kilowatts weren't they?

A stock GTS-t R33 makes 180-185kw at the flywheel which equates to a LOT less at the wheels.

A stock car will make approxx 120-130 HP at the wheels which is 88-95kw at the wheels. This I know because i have seen my car which was completly stock when i bought it and in fantasic condition and i have gone down the road of modifacation.

So what your saying is a stock R33 GTST looses around 90kw going to the back wheels?

Once again, dyno's differ, especially different brands.

My R32 GTST making 160fwkw dead stock made 110rwkw.

Exhaust, fmic and boost it jumped to 164rwkw. I had the car on 3 different but same brand dyno's. One varied -10rwkw, it was on a 35degree day though.

85-90rwkw for 185fwkw is unrealistic. My old N/A VLmade 80rwkw on an old school dyno that had a big clock and needle looking thing that gave the power readout. :)

My car has now produced 210 HP at the wheels which equates to 154kw which is starting to become a nice street car I have a Hiflow Turbo coming and a SAFC tune on the way. I completly fail to see how the figures that you guys are talking 200rwkw with a stock dump pipe I cant help but feel that this is a crock of shit 200kw equates to 271hp

Which u JUST CANT GET with a stock dump PIPE I had to go for a aftermarket dump pipe when i hit 185-190 hp at the wheels. I think someone is telling porky's

http://www.digitaldutch.com/unitconverter/

whoever sold you the dump pipe is laughing right now... did you dyno the car with the exhaust dropped to make sure there was a restriction?

more importantly do you already have some kind of fuel management because the standard ecus tendency to richen the top end mixtures when boosted will rob you of alot more power than the stock dump pipe...

In fact with your 'highflow that is coming' you may want a ecu that lets you adjust the ignition timing not to mention that you will probably want to use a/m injectors too... unless your going to run a highflow with an SAFC and standard injectors but your not afraid of frying the rings are you!

Finally just cos your car was in great condition on the outside doesn't mean that the motor has perfect compression ...remember your talking about a 10yr old turbo car here... and don't even start me on believing the odometer reading!

so yeah the stock dump pipe isn't a huge restriction and can happily stay as long as the stock turbo, other things are more important imho

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I thought I'd do a write up on an auto transmission fluid change for a the nissan 7 speed Automatic. At some stage the genius engineers decided that the fluid in the trans was "for the life of the transmission", (which seems kind of self supporting to me) and removed the dip stick and fill tube (funnily enough there is still a casting for it). Anyway, for this job you do need 2 specialist tools in addition to regular hand tools, jack and good chassis stands. You need a way to pump fluid up to the transmission; I got one of these but there are plenty of other options: https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/364584087070 Don't trust the generic listing though, it does not come with the required adapter for the Nissan 7 Speed. You need one of these, can't do the job without it: https://navarapart.com.au/product/genuine-nissan-patrol-y62-d23-np300-navara-re7-dipstick-fill-connector1 You need a heap of compatible transmission oil. Could be Nissan, could be anything else rated for Nissan Matic S. You need at least 10 litres, I had 15 to give it a better flush... Also, you need some biiig oil catch trays, at least one of these, or bigger if possible (volume was fine, size was very marginal): https://autobarn.com.au/ab/Autobarn-Category/Tools-%26-Garage/Specialty-Tools/Oil-Service/Garage-Tough-Oil-Drain-Pan-Black-16L---GT1068/p/TO03191 Finally, a measuring jug is very useful if your pump does not have volumes marked on it, I got a 6l one: https://www.repco.com.au/oils-fluids/fluid-accessories/measuring-jugs/penrite-measuring-jug-6l-pmj006/p/A5322648 Oh, and gloves.....this stuff is horrible (not as bad as diff oil, but getting there) ....First, jack up your car.....
    • So I mentioned the apprentice, @LachyK helped take the bonnet off. We just undid the nuts on the hinges and unclipped the gas struts, then pulled the bonnet back a little as the front was catching on the front bar.  I had a good look at everything today and have removed the rams, repaired/reset the hinges and bolted it back together like it never happened. I'll do a separate write up on the repair, and I also removed the poppers from the Fuga today too to save grief down the road.....as said above it is at least $5k to repair retail. I'm also happier about my ability to prepare a race car, and less happy about Nis-nault's engineering (I can hear @GTSBoy sAfrican Americaning) because the top hose of the radiator didn't slip off.......it snapped clean off. By practice I put the hose clamp hard up against the flare on a neck to make it least likely to ever move (thanks @Neil!). I guess that puts a little more pressure on the end of the pipe as it is further away from the rad, but still, that is pretty shit. I've put it back on for now as there was a fair bit of neck still there, but obviously there is no lip on the neck any more so I don't think I'll track it again until I have a new rad. Speaking of which....more research required. It looks like Koyo makes a standard size radiator in ally which I'll grab in the meantime, but I really want something thicker so might have to go custom in the medium term (ouch) Coolant still needs a refill and I have the pressure tester on it over night, but other than a wash down of the engine bay it seems alright. And @MBS206 noted something noisy on the front of the engine and I think I agree....time for a new accessory belt and tensioners I think.
    • our good friends at nismo make a diff for it, I have one (and a spare housing to put the centre in) on the way. https://www.nismo.co.jp/products/web_catalogue/lsd/mechanical_lsd_v37.html AMS also make a helical one, but I prefer mechanical for track use in 2wd (I do run a quaife in the front, but not rear of the R32)
    • What are we supposed to be seeing in the photo of the steering angle sensor? The outer housing doesn't turn, right? All the action is on the inside. The real test here is whether or not your car has had the steering put back together by a butcher. When the steering is centred (and we're not caring about the wheel too much here, we're talking about the front wheels, parallel, facing front) then you should have an absolutely even number of turns from centre to left lock and centre to right lock. If there is any difference at all then perhaps the thing has been put back together wrongly, either the steering wheel put on one spline (or more!) off, and the alignment bodged to straighteb the wheel, or the opposite where something silly was done underneath and the wheel put back on crooked to compensate. Nut there isn't actually much evidence that you have such a problem anyway. It is something you can easily measure and test for to find out though. My money is still on the HICAS CU not driving the PS solenoid with the proper PWM signal required to lighten the load at lower speed. If it were me, I would be putting either a multimeter or oscilloscope onto the solenoid terminals and taking it for a drive, looking for the voltage to change. The PWM signal is 0v, 12V, 0V, 12v with ...obviously...modulated pulse width. You should see that as an average voltage somewhere between 0V and 12V, and it should vary with speed. An handheld oscilloscope would be the better tool for this, because they are definitely good enough but there's no telling if any cheap shit multimeter that people have lying around are good enough. You can also directly interfere with the solenoid. If you wire up a little voltage divider with variable resistor on it, and hook the PS solenoid direct to 12V through that, you can manually adjust the voltage to the solenoid and you should be able to make it go ligheter and heavier. If you cannot, then the problem is either the solenoid itself dead, or your description of the steering being "tight" (which I have just been assuming you mean "heavy") could be that you have a mechanical problem in the steering and there is heaps of resistance to movement.
    • Little update  I have shimmed the solenoid on the rack today following Keep it Reets video on YouTube. However my steering is still tight. I have this showing on Nisscan, my steering angle sensor was the closest to 0 degrees (I could get it to 0 degrees by small little tweaks, but the angle was way off centre? I can't figure this out for the life of me. I get no faults through Nisscan. 
×
×
  • Create New...