Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I recently had a timing belt done on my 95 r33 gtst. About 2 days later the engine started to stutter under load. Thats the best way i can describe it. It stutters at about 4000rpm and although it is mostly under load it will do it very slightly in neutral. The problem with this is it is intermittant. It will happen 2 or 3 times a day and then go away. Its only just started today and i had run my car until the fuel level was very low. Im not sure if this could be the issue.

Another problem i have is the tacho will intermittantly fail. The needle will just slowly work its way up the tacho while im driving it in incriments of about 500rpm regardless of what the engine is actually doing. And sometimes it works perfectly.

Any ideas???

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/89709-a-few-r33-issues/
Share on other sites

I had that stutter thing as well when I put my timing belt in also, while driving and also while sitting at the lights. So I had to take everything apart again and re-fitted the belt and now it works fine. Could be that the belt is just one tooth out of place. Don't know about your tacho though.

"Mmmm, unexplained bacon."

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/89709-a-few-r33-issues/#findComment-1617966
Share on other sites

plug for cas in properly, give it a wiggle and see what happens

Checked that. Seems fine. Also i dont think refitting the belt will help. Its intermittant. It idles perfectly and most of the time it drives perfectly so i doubt its the belt.

Edited by Bleach1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/89709-a-few-r33-issues/#findComment-1618110
Share on other sites

Spark plug problem?

Coil pack problem?

Mate, it could really be anything. As its intemittent, you can only eliminate the possiblities. I would chase the spark related components first, then fuel, then air.

I have seen dry solder joins in Commodore ECU's change a cars idle. and by twisting the PCB the car will start idling fine....

Cheers

Sumo

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/89709-a-few-r33-issues/#findComment-1620662
Share on other sites

Just an update all. Tested everything to do with ignition no avail. Then drained some fuel. The stuff was brown and had particles all through it! Cleaned the injectors today, flushed the tank, replace fuel filter. Missfire is cured. This was contaminated optimax so im going to try and pass on the costs to the servo involved.

Still lost with the tacho though. Does anyone know how the tacho works on the r33? Is it just a change in resistance that directs the needle? If so it shouldnt be hard to remove the cluster, check the resistance and if everything seems ok it may be time for a new tacho. Although were is a wiring diagram and some test values available from?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/89709-a-few-r33-issues/#findComment-1622281
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...