Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

For all those that have been thinking about getting braided brake lines to reduce the expansion rubber hoses can have under big brake pressure, there is an interesting article on Autospeed this week http://autospeed.com/cms/A_2679/article.html

"Well, the first hose we tested was an old and worn rubber hose (which appears to be the original part from a ’65 Ford Mustang). In static conditions, this hose had an OD of 10.76mm and, when pressurised, it expanded to 11.02mm. An increase of 2.4 percent.

Next, we tested a brand new rubber hose. The new hose had a 10.47mm OD which expanded to 10.65mm when pressurised. An increase of 1.7 percent.

The final test was a new braided steel brake line. In static conditions, the braided line had an OD of 6.45mm and expanded to 6.49mm when pressurised. An increase of less than 1 percent."

0.7% difference in exansion between rubber and braided lines at 3500psi (about twice what you could actually generate). Considering the price is about 3 - 4 times as much......just buy new rubber hoses.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90013-braided-or-rubber-brake-hoses/
Share on other sites

Can I ask what might be a stupid question. Percentages are nice and all, but in real life what does that percentage mean, like, is that 0.5% in expansion a bit increase or not?

Also remember whatever it is its x4.

3 - 4 times as much??? pffft. The braided hose we got from Maltech were marginally more expensive than Nissan hoses. They cost around $350 for a set of 4. I purchased a pair of genuine Nissan front hoses at $90 EACH.

3 - 4 times as expensive. PFFFTT!

yeah the genuine rubber ones are more expensive these days. i bought a set of nismo braided lines for 10 000 yen (about $130). they were very nice too.

the expansion measurement as a percentage is interesting too. the fact is the old rubber expanded .26mm where as the braided line only expanded .04. that is quite a difference among 4 lines (well six really on the GTR).

well I lost the receipt for my rubber lines in the mountain of receipts I have. But any decent brake shop can make up brake lines for you much cheaper, you don't need to use the Nissan ones.

And I can assure you that my pedal feel is brilliant with the new rubber hoses :P

the nismo ones, were they $130 a corner?

nah, $130 for all 6. they are really nice too. Teflon lines, covered with stainless braid, then sheathed in teflon (or it may be silicone) to protect them. Without something covering the braid you can get problems as over time bits of dirt and grit can work their way into the gaps in the braid then slowing wear away at the line inside.

edit: I should mention that i bought them in japan on the cheap. I think the retail in japan is about 15 000 yen, and over here they are probably about $300 a set. still a good deal i reckon even at that price. particulary if bens maltech ones were $500 :P

I had braided lines on my 32 when it arrived, though for compliance reasons had to take them off. MASSIVE difference in feel of pedal. Was quite shocked, i thought the brand new lines i got made up would be very similar. Will hopefully go back to braided lines at some stage. It cost excactly twice as much for braided lines as rubber ones when i got quote. PS Have set of HKS sports braided lines for sale.

Guys please correct me if I have it wrong, but the way I see it, if hose A expands by 1.7% and hose B expands by 1%, then the conclusion is that hose A expands 70% more than B, not a .7% difference...?

So 1/1.7 = braided has only 60% of the expansion that rubber does?

Also keep in mind that the tests where probably done at room temperature not at the temperatures often seen by brake hoses (you should all know rubber gets softer with heat). Also with braided hoses being silver wouldn't they be less susceptible to transfering heat to the brake fluid.

Carlos

I think it's just a case of the journalist having some space to fill in and not actually understanding what's going on.

I have been involved and done similar tests and i know how to manipulate percentages, just measuring the expansion of the hose is not good enough. If you are going to do this type of test you must ensure each hose is the same length and new (not like the rubber hose shown). Also the machine used to do the test as shown in the article is not adequate for this type of testing, it keeps pumping pressure until its reaches it set pressure, the way it should be done is see what force is required to reach a certain pressure this will tell you how much the pressure the hose is absorbing. I’m certain a braided hose will out perform a rubber hose anytime.

omrae it sounds like you know what you are talking about....

Now I agree in total braided lines will be better than rubber....the question is, how much better.

If a new rubber line really does increase only 0.7% more than a braided one does, I am willing to bet that no-one could actually tell the difference on the track :)

If a new rubber line really does increase only 0.7% more than a braided one does, I am willing to bet that no-one could actually tell the difference on the track :)

I'll make up some number just for the sake of simplicity.

Assume the OD of the hose is 10mm.

If hose A expands to 11mm and hose B expands to 15mm:

Hose A has increased by 10%

Hose B has increased by 50%

Hose B has not increased 40% more than A, it has increased 5 times that of A.

What I'm getting at is, the rubber hose increased by 1.7%, braided >1.0%, therefore the rubber hose has increased by nearly twice what the braided line did.

cowie165 I agree mathematically 1.7% is almost twice the expansion of 1% but thats not really the point....the difference in total diameter is 1% or 1.7% which lets face it is bugger all as a percentage of total diameter.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I am getting the same issue. Did you resolve it? I just got it after installing my new super coppermix and literally the same issue, new fork, new 18mm carrier, release bearing that came with the kit and replicated the exact same sound. 
    • If you like - I have the STL files so I can email em. There's a couple of gotchas (i.e the holes are not threaded so you might need/will need) to utilize some M3 melt-in threads for some of the points. However if you want to be super accurate, and are willing to remove your calipers and your SHOCKS it's a really good tool. You also might need to scale the part that measures the tyre width a bit wider. It defaults to a 7.5in tyre and I mean who is running that. Luckily with the magic of CAD this is very easy to rescale.
    • jeebus. glad you weren't under it while performing the stunt. Also thanks for the link to the wheel measurer, exactly what I needed
    • In the older stuff there were very significant differences 2wd to 4wd, for example Stagea had strut front end for 2wd and double wishbone for 4wd so it was not minor to swap. From poking around the 2wd v37, it *looks* like it might be more possible; some of the parts specifically have "2wd" stamped on them which suggests the platforms are more similar. You'd still want to start with a 4wd half cut to swap stuff from though. I'd suggest if you don't have a tune on the ECU you don't really need one on the trans either. Throttle mapping is in the ECU side (and you can always use a Roar Pedal if you want the throttle to actually respond to your foot), and really if you are happy with the stock power you probably accept the stock trans behaviour too....its all made to be "sporty" not racey.
    • So, updates. I have not washed the car since it came back from Tassie. I've driven it around a bit but not got around to actually sorting it out. I DID raise it because I cracked the rear bar leaving a hotel which was very distressing. Interestingly, the car drives more compliant now that it's raised a fair bit (5mm front, 15mm rear). Also noticed that my FR height was 10mm lower than FL. So that's now sorted out, too. I also bought this and had it printed: https://www.etsy.com/au/listing/1576422240/wheel-and-tire-fitment-tool-universal?ref=shop_home_feat_1&dd=1&logging_key=08f604d9fa4cc383550ba985e6ac85cd5cac7fbb%3A1576422240 Now, if I was smart I would have taken my brake calipers off to actually use this correctly but it was evident enough to me that in the region where the caliper was... there was nothing to hit suspension/guard/arm wise. So I'm going with "it'll be fine" after using the tool to hopefully very precisely measure the wheel clearance. Also while doing this, I had the very VERY bad idea of jacking one of the wheels/suspension arms up while the rest of the car was on jack stands. I did this to see how the arm would travel. This all was well and good until the car slid off the stands and went through a fence. So don't do that. Incredibly nobody was hurt and there was only minor damage to the rear bumper as the car didn't have far to slide, and had 3-4 wheels on it. The only damage turned out to be the fence itself which was easy to fix, and a little bit of damage to the fibreglass rear bumper trim. I had already planned to try a touch up paint kit to fix the time I drove into my garage door to see if it'd help in the interim before I get it fixed properly. I used the Dr Colorchip kit after looking online and seeing everyone talking about it. Yes it's made for chips and not huge broken missing pieces and I'll be 500% recommending it for stone chips after using it for stupid things like me. This took about ... 10 minutes and looking at the half assed photo the 30 second job I did on the bumper corner was almost perfect just by using the tiny little brush and painting it in. The sealact stuff to remove over-painting is really useful, so if/when I do it again I'll likely slather the touch up paint well over it and then clean it up with the cleaning solution. The wheels should arrive in a couple of weeks. I am still kinda confident after doing a stupid amount of measuring (and borrowing a set of 18x10.5+15) that they will not fit because I overlooked something, somehow and flew too close to the sun. ALSO R34 GTR guard liners do not fit on a GTT. I bought the undertray brake duct guides and had the wonderful problem of them not fitting my intake, my oil cooler and the liners themselves were even worse. Attempting to fit them won't work in general - You would have to cut them up as another poster mentioned as the bodywork is different on the GTT. At least I can try to resell them. So instead of cutting those up, I cut up my old already-cut-up GTT liners and extended them by using some PP plastic and drilling some 8mm holes for some nissan clips for the 'extra' bit. Because I was happy to cut them I was able to mount them pretty damn forward so I now have some semblance of guard liners, and the brake vents seal the bumper from the bottom. It sort-of-looks like this, to give some idea - If you look at the GTR and then the GTT this is when I realised that I needed to seriously measure as the inside of the rim area is entirely, entirely, entirely different and could not take any internet measurements for granted.   
×
×
  • Create New...