Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

There has been a couple of threads on this in the last few weeks.

A leak down test is more informative than a compression test.

Also, it's more important that the compression is even than that it is a particular psi on a particular gaugue on a particular day with a particular battery level with whatever temperature the engine is.

All of those things affect the reading.

Thanks for your reply, i got the results in and the compression in each cyclinder is as follows: 90 75 90 75 90 90. The guys at the workshop reckon this is okay. But like you said its pretty even. So should this be a worry at all?

There has been a couple of threads on this in the last few weeks.

A leak down test is more informative than a compression test.

Also, it's more important that the compression is even than that it is a particular psi on a particular gaugue on a particular day with a particular battery level with whatever temperature the engine is.

All of those things affect the reading.

Thanks for your reply, i got the results in and the compression in each cyclinder is as follows: 90 75 90 75 90 90. The guys at the workshop reckon this is okay. But like you said its pretty even. So should this be a worry at all?

If the compression test was conducted properly (warm engine, wide open throttle when cranking) then those results are pretty poor and the engine is fairly worn out. I believe Nissan specifications say 130 - 170psi.

WHat do you mean by wide open throttle when cranking? This GTR also has a worn out clutch would that affect the reults at all?

If the compression test was conducted properly (warm engine, wide open throttle when cranking) then those results are pretty poor and the engine is fairly worn out. I believe Nissan specifications say 130 - 170psi.

Engine should be adequately warmed, fuel pump fuse taken out, throttle floored and crank engine until gauge doesn't move. 8 or so compression strokes.

from nissan manual

new 171psi

normal 160psi

limit 128psi

14psi max variance between cylinders.

I tested mine and got 175 175 175 165 170 173psi, 1992 GTR

It was higher than stock? Could it be from carbon in the cylinders increasing the compression ratio?

when i got mine tested 1990 GTR

i got 140 140 135 140 135 140

which is ok for one thats done 100k little low but even so...

and as far as i understand u dont wanna go below 130

i dont know the whole deal but those pressures dont sound good

good luck

RellikZephyr

I just had mine comp tested at Grey imports here in sydney. 190 highest and 180 lowest..maybe gauge was reading high? But still pretty even which is a good sign, nathan there said, no need for a leak down test, its pretty good.

after I rebuilt my gtst - which is practically the same so be quiet all you GTR owners - I had a reading of 120 140 130 160 80 120 when it was cold and a reading of 160 160 160 160 160 160 when it was warm.

This is how much of a difference it will make so get it checked when it is at operating temp.

I also have forged pistons so be quiet all you cast piston owners....lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I hadn't thought about the variable power steering assist. Presumably, it will always be the same level of assist as you get in an S14. The R32/3/4 are either helliishly heavy (at low speeds) if the solenoid is not powered at all, or hellishly too light (at high speed) if it is powered all the time. I presume that it is PWM controlled on those cars. I hadn't thought about the S cars not having variable assist. ugh. What crappy plebby cars they must be!  
    • Hmm yeah that is a good point. It looks like it'll just bolt in with no real issue besides maybe the bushings being different. My other concern was that 2 pin plug that I assume is used in some way to control the rack solenoid depending on the speed signal from the ecu. The DMAX rack doesn't even have that plug though so, don't think it'll matter. Might just order the rack and see how it goes. Will update this when I figure something out
    • I'd say it's a fair bet that the feed and return fluid lines will be in different enough spots that you would need to come up with a way to cut the originals short and adapt with new hard line adaption or braided teflon hoses or somesuch. But really, you have the car, you have the photos of the DMAX rack - you should be able to go out there and see for yourself whether they're in the same or different spots.
    • I've been doing some looking around and honestly was just considering throwing a new rack at it. I saw that the dmax silvia rack bolts up into the 33 with the silvia bushings but not sure if the high pressure lines will sit in the correct spot. I believe other version of the 33 rack are the same/similar to the racks that can be opened up without as much fuss so I assume the dmax rack would fit but any ideas?
    • I've never played with one, but I would expect that you are correct. That slot looks like it is intended to be used to unscrew the end, and the flats on the body would be better than grabbing it around the round bit with a pipe wrench. So, yeah, probably unscrews. You'll probably have to make a tool to drive in that slot.
×
×
  • Create New...