Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys, just need a little help with my upgrades.

ive got an r33 gtst and am looking at getting something close to 250rwkw with a turbo upgrade in the near future. my current mods are fmic, power fc, exhaust, cam gears, pod filter and boost controller. would gtr injectors and pump be big enough to support this power? ive had many mixed answers to this question thought id just ask you guys.

thanks guys.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90383-quick-question/
Share on other sites

can pick up Nismo injectors from nengun.com for pretty cheap (GTRinjectors are top fed, RB25 injectors are side fed = dont fit),

thats where I got my 840cc ones from, I also had a Bosch 040 in tank pump...it lasted a year an was noisy. Now have the equivilant Nippon Denso pump which has made a huge diference, also with half the noise!

my set-up is similar to yours, I'm running a hi-flow turbo on hi psi (18-20) and making 248rwkw.....not much more i can squeeze out of the turbo now though, it's pretty much at its limits, either cams or different turbo set-up to go further?

but this set-up has run very reliably with no problems arising over the 1.5yrs i've had it like this (apart from bosch pump dieing and not getting anything back under warranty)

cheers, my 2 cents

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90383-quick-question/#findComment-1630745
Share on other sites

agreed.

get nismo injectors, direct fit = no issues.

either 555 or 740 (only a $50 price difference from memory)

ontop of that, bosch fuel pump/hi-flo turbo and a PFC.

Dont bother with cam gears. No gain to be had unless your making massive power. No need for cams either

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90383-quick-question/#findComment-1630865
Share on other sites

no cam gears? my mate said 2 deffintaly get some

i was gonna buy some to go wit my car, usual mods, full zorst, bosh 040, power fc, cooler, pod, boost at around 10,11psi, fuel presure reg

so no need?

search, its been covered.

RB25/stocker turbo and a cam gear = did nothing at all. No gain to be had.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90383-quick-question/#findComment-1631663
Share on other sites

search, its been covered.

RB25/stocker turbo and a cam gear = did nothing at all. No gain to be had.

This always seems to be an area of debate...

I personally don't have one on my car, but have heard of people getting gains with an adj cam gear on the Std turbo...in contrast, I've also heard people getting no gain at all. Do a search for Benm's thread at least a year back where he got around ~10rwkw gain from an adjustable cam gear on a stock turbo RB25.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90383-quick-question/#findComment-1631708
Share on other sites

Yeah it generally is...

12months ago it was very uncommon for it.

but more people have fiddled recently only to find they have wasted $$$ as its done nothing and with a few hours on the rollers no plotable gain was made.

If i recall there have been 2-3 threads in the past 3 months on it

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90383-quick-question/#findComment-1632991
Share on other sites

thanks for the replys guys

abcent - ive been told hi flow turbos for an r33 will only get me 220-230rwkw. im thinking about doing a hiflow but this is scaring me. is this true?

Search for Sydneykid and gcg highflow he has done or seen this on several cars making ~265rwkw with tommei poncams and supporting mods with more power everywhere. If I ever upgrade my turbo this is what I will be doing.

There is also someone on here has also put a larger exhaust housing on the turbo and made 290rwkw.

Edited by Munna
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90383-quick-question/#findComment-1635475
Share on other sites

Hiflowing the stock turbo is a good, reliable and relatively inexpensive upgrade. It's usually good for around 230rwkw with the usual supporting mods (i.e PFC, FMIC, EBC, 3" turbo back exhaust, upgrade fuel pump & injectors). If you are satisfied with this level of power, then bang for buck, nothing beats the hiflow.

The reason why a lot of people don't choose the hiflow is because to get say 250rwkw using a hiflow (which seems to be a common goal these days), in addition to paying for your stock turbo to be hiflowed, you'll also need to spend more money on other areas of your engine (i.e cams, porting etc) than it would cost to buy a larger turbo that would do the job straight out of the box. Obviously the slight trade off with buying a larger turbo is that you loose some of the response of the hiflow, but at that power range the difference is relatively small.

Another reason why people decide against the hiflow is simply to leave some headroom for further modifications down the track.

If you want around 250rwkw with the original supporting modifications that I mentioned above, then the HKS GT-RS (or Garrett equivalent) is probably the best option. Their are quite a few people on the forum that are making upwards of 250rwkw with this turbo.

At the end of the day, either of the turbos can get you 250rwkw. You just have to decide which road you want to take to get there :blink:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90383-quick-question/#findComment-1637412
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I will rebutt this and the preceding point from Dose....but without doing any calcs to demonstrate anything and without knowing that I am right or wrong. But... The flow capacity of a fluid transfer system is not limited by the smallest orifice or section of conduit in that system, unless it is drastically smaller than the rest of the system. OK, I use the word drastically perhaps with too much emphasis, but let's drill down on what I really mean. The flow capacity of the system is the result of the sum of the restrictions of the entire system. So, to make an extreme example, if you have a network with 3" pipe everywhere (and let's say a total length of only a few metres) and that 12mm ID restriction of the oil filter connection being the obvious restriction, then for any given amount of pressure available, the vast majority of all the pressure drop in the system is going to occur in the 12mm restriction. But.... increase the length of the 3" pipeline to, say 1000m, and suddenly the pipe pressure loss will likely add up to either be in the same order of magnitude, possibly even exceeding that of the 12mm restriction. Now the 12mm restriction starts to matter less. Translate this to the actual engine, actual oil cooler hose sizing, etc etc, and perhaps: The pressure loss caused by flowing through the narrow section (being the 12mm oil filter port, and perhaps any internal engine oil flow pathways associated with it) is a certain number. The pressure loss through, say, -12 hoses out to the cooler and back is negligible, but The pressure loss through -10 hoses out to the cooler, at the exact same length as the above, starts to become a decent fraction of the loss through the 12mm stuff at the filter port. Maybe even it starts to exceed it. I could actually do these calcs if I knew 1) how much oil was actually flowing in the line, 2) gave enough of a f**k to do things that I hate doing for work, voluntarily for a hypothetical discussion. Anyway - I reiterate. It's not the narrowest port that necessarily determines how much it can all flow. It is the sum. A long enough length of seemingly fat enough pipe can still cause more loss than a semmingly dominant small bore restriction.
    • To pick up what Dose is putting down. Not a lot of point running a huge hose if the motor is still restricted to the smaller size... It's only capable of flowing so much at that point...   *Waits for GTSBoy to come in and bring in the technicalities of length of pipe, and additional restriction from wall friction etc etc*
    • Hooley Dooley these things have some history! If i sell them they will need a certificate of providence to prove they have been in the hands of verified RB20 royalty! They have been stored in a plastic tub, away from sunlight and moisture. They are in mint condition. And they will stay that way, as i have sprung the money for a set of shockworks coilovers. I'm just working on getting them in at the moment, after rebushing the rear of the car, and while the subframe was out i welded in the GKtech reinforcement bracing as well.  They will get a workout at Ararat King of The Hill in November. I ran 48s on the short course there a few months ago, and i am hoping with new bushes and shocks in the rear i can launch a bit harder. There was a fair bit of axle tramp when i tried too hard off the line. a few of the corners had dips mid way which also made the car feel a bit unsettled, hopefully this will help there too.   
    • Food for thought, the stock oil filter thread is a 3/4-16 UNF, which has an ID of about 10 to 12mm (according to ChatGPT lol). Now compare than to an 10AN, which has an ID of about 14mm (Raceworks is 14.2mm, Speed flow is 14.27mm).  
    • Yep, totally get that. However hooking in for Generator back up is only a few hundred bucks for the wiring. You could put a couple of those in (for different circuits explicitly) and run a couple of baby generators. Bonus, you can balance them across different circuits, and now have backups in your backup. I'm looking at buying places that won't even have water etc, and I don't mind the idea of getting off the electric grid either, even with everything you've said. This country already has enough power outages that even the mains grid isn't that reliable anymore. I do agree though on spending a bit more to get better gear, and to add some extra redundancy in to the system too.
×
×
  • Create New...