Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey,

Today I finally got my GTR tuned with my GTSS turbo's and MINES dump pipe upgrade. MRC in Castle Hill who installed the turbo kit a few months ago did all the tuning work on it.

Just for information value current mods on car is..

GTSS turbo's

Mines dumps

HKS front pipes

Trust PEII cat back

Cam gears

Profec b boost controller

Power fc

Apexi pods

So still standard intercooler, injectors, pump, air flow meters etc.

As the graphs show it made 275kw's at 1.1 bar and pretty good 12:1 air fuel ratios. Boost is very steady after the initial slight spike. Car feels a whole lot better. Only downside is the air flow meters are maxed out, and to be expected the oil temp does creep up quicker and go higher. Nothing that a cooler wont fix. At this stage the fuelling and cooling will probably stay as they are as I dont have the money at the minute to upgrade, but all is very safe none the less. It did make a peak of 294kw's but he pulled some timing out just to be on the safe side.

Overall very happy with the performance and service of Mark at MRC.

NOTE* If anything is thinking of doing GTSS turbo's on their GTR DO IT!! They're awesome street turbo's. And to those with cams aswell even better!

post-2062-1128934124.jpg

post-2062-1128934159.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90604-dyno-tuned-with-gtss-turbos/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

awesome....so 300kws isnt out of the question with bigger, injectors and cooler and z32 afms ?

I think I spotted you on george st right in front of the cinemas on saturday night......

I know your plates but I didnt get see them so yeah unless it was another silver 32 with Work rims hehe

Nice, Is that rwkw or awkw?

Looks like you're hitting full boost/1bar boost around 4200-4300pm? williamsf1 said he was getting 1bar at 2900rpm!! Surely that can't all be cams?

I'm about to put a set of these on so trying to find out as much as possible. But i'll probably run mine at 1.3-1.4bar.

Whats your max injector duty on stock inj?

Nice, Is that rwkw or awkw?

Looks like you're hitting full boost/1bar boost around  4200-4300pm? williamsf1 said he was getting 1bar at 2900rpm!! Surely that can't all be cams?

I'm about to put a set of these on so trying to find out as much as possible. But i'll probably run mine at 1.3-1.4bar.

Whats your max injector duty on stock inj?

that's interesting about the boost. mine with stock turbos makes 1 bar at ~3700. it seems jonos is at ~4250. still not bad, but i would have expected under 4000.

that's interesting about the boost. mine with stock turbos makes 1 bar at ~3700. it seems jonos is at ~4250. still not bad, but i would have expected under 4000.

Yeah i'm interested to know how mine goes when i get them fitted. Give me a month or so and i'll be back.

Nice, Is that rwkw or awkw?

Looks like you're hitting full boost/1bar boost around  4200-4300pm? williamsf1 said he was getting 1bar at 2900rpm!! Surely that can't all be cams?

I'm about to put a set of these on so trying to find out as much as possible. But i'll probably run mine at 1.3-1.4bar.

Whats your max injector duty on stock inj?

Yep rwkw.

The stock injectors surely induce that 'lag' so to speak, the tuner said it could be slightly better but the stockers are pretty much close to their limit. Cams would be the other big contributor.

Don't know duty cycle of the injectors, if I get my hands on a pfc commander i'll see then.

Mine made 252rwkw's on the stock turbo's.

Yep rwkw.

The stock injectors surely induce that 'lag' so to speak, the tuner said it could be slightly better but the stockers are pretty much close to their limit. Cams would be the other big contributor.

Don't know duty cycle of the injectors, if I get my hands on a pfc commander i'll see then.

Mine made 252rwkw's on the stock turbo's.

Do you have a fuel pressure reg?

How do stock injectors induce the 'lag'? Would be good to know what duty cycle your hitting - you don't have a h/c?

252rwkw sounds pretty close to what i made on stock turbos. Do you have adjustable cam gears?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...