Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guy's,

I'm about to undertake an Rb25/30 conversion on my Turbo. I have bought the head(Rb25det(R33)) and rebuilding my RB 30 Turbo Bottom End.

My questions !!!!!!

1. Who on here have done the conversion.

2. How many kilometres since the conversion or until you sold it

3. Have you had any problems

I spoke to a member of a performance shop at Morningside(not naming names) and they told me I will have nothing but problems and it's a waste of money.

Anyone wanna way in on the subject is welcome.

My plan is(No short cuts) ;

Full rebuild with the block full prepped, re bored 20thou oversized.

New Wiseco Forged RB25 Pistons, New RB30 Parr Rods balanced and shotpeened. All new gaskets etc etc. Garrett 35/40 Turbo, Custom high mount manifold and custom computer(Prob Microtech).

My mechanic said he had no problems with his conversion but only had it for three months before selling it. He has made me keen as, but after speaking to the guy from the shop I'm starting to have second thoughts.........cus I could buy a RB25 or Rb26 complete with some bolt ons for the same money...

Any assistance would be appreciated.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/92037-reliability-issues/
Share on other sites

I built an RB30/RB25DE hybrid over 5 years ago using all standard components, no aftermarket parts at all. It made 475 bhp on the engine dyno, it has done over 70,000 k's without one single problem using the standard ECU chipped. The secret is tuning, knowing the limits and sticking to them. Most problems come from poor tuning and wanting "just a little bit more".

You are going a few steps above that, but the same rules apply. Short comments on parts selction;

Wiseco pistons are OK, why are you going 20/100 over? If the block doesn't need it?

Never used Parr rods so can't comment, forged rods don't need aftermarket shotpeening, the shot just bounces off and does nothing.

Head gasket is important, do some research

Garret 35/40 is an OK choice as long as it meets your power and response targets. What are they?

Custom high mount exhaust manifold, some are good, some are crap, make sure you get a good one.

Personally I would NEVER use a Mictrotech on an RB, they are not suited. We use Microtechs on the RX7's, I wouldn't use anything else. But not on an RB, you will have all sorts of issues that will cost you time and money fixing. I would do some more research.

Hope that helps

;) cheers :)

PS, we have since built over 20 X RB30DET's, one is up to 950 bhp.

Yep,

Trying to get it done right. Parr Rods are being used by Hardcore Racing up here in Brisbane and have cars running 700rwhp without problems.

Looking for btw 300 - 450rwkw.

As far as manifold I will try to get something reputable and proven.

I hear so much about different computers. My mechanic said Haltech but the same guy from Morningside said they are crap and it will cost a fortune to dyno tune. Hardcore and them recommended Microtech. I was thinking the stock ecu with a chip but I'm still wondering what to do.

My mechanic said a 30/40 would be good responsive wise generally but he recommended a 35/40. He said it will lag a little(35/40) but in the event I want to boost it and get that bit more, I dont have to upgrade the turbo.

Good to hear the numbers you have built and the numbers they have been punching out.

By the way the car will be my drive car everyday so thats why I really need the reliability.

Cheers Imtorqing

The new microtech plug in is worth looking at.

They now have closed loop. Very attractive indeed.

If your looking for 300 to say 330rwkw then stick with prepped std rods providing the car is a streeter, if its anything more than a streeter I would not look past a set of decent rods. Run good bearings and u will be fine.

Edited by Cubes

Your motor is only as good as it's tune... The Gt35r turbo is the go with the .82 exhaust. I'd go with the power fc, they're designed for the rb and have been proven to better then most computers, and are on hundreds of cars on this forum.

ive got an rb25/30 combo

blueprinted/balanced, shot peened rods, aria's hpc coated pistons, just to name a few mods, got a whole list of them on the site

td07s turbo with to4r comp wheel and back cut t66 rear with 360 degree thrust bearing

autosalon dyno made 352rwkw@16psi

ben...

one last coment consider buildign an rb26 for the kind of power you are looking for 400-450 rwkw the development is there .

on last thing at that hosre power dont expect much more that 10 or 20,000 klms . and more than likely sub 10 000 klms. 300 rwkw will see a much longer servicable life with a good shot of nos when your on the track.

next before you build any thing I woud suggest going for a ride in a car with 350 rwkw + and make sure its what you want b4 spending all your money.

cheers

meggala

Exactly as Meggala states. :D

Our recent dyno day had a few cars up around the 300rwkw mark.

Their complaint was.. traction. One said, its quite dissapointing on the street, no traction until 4th gear. The car was setup with rather hard suspension and no pinneapples, and.. it was a rb30/25, torque kills traction. :rolleyes:

I thought the linear nature of the rb30 would help traction. I was wrong. :P

I spoke to a member of a performance shop at Morningside(not naming names) and they told me I will have nothing but problems and it's a waste of money.

I wouldnt be going there ever again for the simple fact of...

They obviously no idea about anything. Amatuers.

SK has hit it on the head with a lot of what he has said... but for a 300-450rwkw.. thats a massive span mate.

You need to be more specific. is it 300 or 450?

300 will be doable with a GT30, .82 or 1.06 and will be very responsive

350 will be a GT35 no worries with pretty decent response also

400 you can get from a GT35, you might have to fuel it up on something other than pulp though with bigger boost and more ignition gear over stock

Your also going to need some headwork in there for much over the 300 region, including cams, porting and all that jazz to get the flow going

As NIB said also, go with an ECU that your tuner knows.

You'll get the best results that way as opposed to giving them something they are unfimiliar with

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My first car was a HG. I'm very familiar with them. A mild cam upgrade is a good idea. The 186 is a very flexible engine - meaning it has good torque from down low. You can give up a little torque down low for quite a lot more excitement in the mid range, and a bit more up top - but they are not exactly a rev monster. You need to upgrade valve springs at the minimum. For a bigger cam, you'd want to make sure it wasn't still running the original fibre cam gear. That would be unlikely, given that most of them shat themselves in the 70s and 80s, but still within the realms of possibility. Metal cam gear required. Carbies are a huge issue. The classic upgrade was always a Holley 350, which works, but is usually pretty bad for fuel consumption. The 186S had a 2 barrel Stromberg on it that was very similar to the one on the 253, and is a reasonable thing if you can find one, and find someone to help you get it set up (which is the same issue with setting up a 350 to work nice). The more classic upgrade was twin sidedraught CD type carbs, or triples of same, or triple Webers. The XU-1 triple Webers being the best example. You can still buy all this stuff new, I think, but it's a lot of coin to drop. And then the people able to set them up are getting fewer and further in between. There's still some, but it used to be everyone's** dad and uncle could do it. **Not everyone's! But a lot. All in all, I wouldn't get too carried away with the engine. Anything you do to it without a full rebuild for power and revs will only make it slightly faster. I am all in favour of a complete teardown rebuild, with nice rods and pistons, 10 or 1.5:1 compression, and a clean port job with at least a big enough cam to run 98 with that compression, if not bigger. And if I did that to a dirty old red motor, I'd want to inject it too, which I'd struggle to fight against the devil on my shoulder that would argue for ITBs and trumpets. But the bills would start to mount up, and it will still never make stupid power. OK, a few people still know how to build absolutely mental red motors, courtesy of the work that went into HQ racing and modern knowledge being applied. But even a 300HP red motor is no match for an RB20 with a TD06. So you have to decide what it's worth to you. I'd just put a set of 6>2>1 extractors, a 2.5" exhaust and an electronic ignition conversion/dizzy on it and just run the old girl like the fairly slow old girl that she really is.
    • Thank you so much for the comments.  This is very interesting and gives me some great ideas to think about. Keen to keep it simple and relatively classic looking. That said, i am not too worried about staying 100% period correct.  A little extra performance and relatively good (or improved) economy is just what i am looking for. Ill be keeping any parts i swap out so if i get nostalgic i can always swap it all back in.  Right now just trying to get some good ideas from people in the know (I still have a lot to learn in this space). Thank you again!  
    • Wrt the engine, you're very much limited by 'production quality' as to how much extra power you can extract from them (I'm talking i6 red-motor) -- a lot here depends on how 'authentic' or 'period correct' you want the modifications to be... ...I'm too old... <grin>...the first true performance engine Holden made, was in the HD/HR models ~ this was the 'X2' performance pack...it came with twin downdraft strombergs on an otherwise unimproved intake manifold, with a two piece exhaust manifold (reckoned to be as good as extractors)... ....these engines were built upon the '179HP' cylinder block, which included extra webbing in the casting to make it stronger and less susceptible to block distortion... The next performance i6 came out with the HK Monaro (also found it's way into the LJ GTR Torana ... the car I wish I hadn't sold)...it had pretty much the same manifold setup, but was built against the '186S' block...this block retained all the extra webbing of the 179HP block, but added a forged steel crankshaft (instead of the stock cast crankshaft), because it was possible to snap the crank... ...apart from the inherent weaknesses in the stock (cast crank) blocks, the next limiting factor is the cylinder head porting & combustion chamber design, and the actual valve sizes. Back in the day, you could buy a 'yella terra' cylinder head (from stage 1 to stage 5 gradients), and this was the way to get serious power out of them -- with the extra breathing of these heads, you could fit a triple SU or DCOE Weber setup... ...obviously, these mods were a waste of time on a stock cylinder head/camshaft grind. My housemate rebuilt the i6 in his VH dunnydore about 6 months back -- this is a 186S block with the 12port 2850 blue motor head and intake/exhaust manifolds, with a dual throat Weber off an XF Falcon mounted on an adapter plate ; it's not a bad makeup...got more torque & fuel economy just light-footing it about on the first throat, but stand on it and it makes more giddy-up than the standard 2850 blue motor that it replaced. Personal note: I'd just fit an RB30 and be done it it 馃槂  
    • Thanks for sharing. That's a great video! My buddy is doing the same thing on his build (S chassis struts and towers). He's building an S14 with billet RB30 shooting for 2000whp... a race car with a TH400 just like this video. For a road car I just couldn't go this route as the strut has to be almost vertical and the caster is not going to pivot correctly (let alone camber gain). You think the R32 frontend is bad, wait till you put a MacPherson strut on without modeling it all in Solidworks to check geometry. I'm not saying it's a bad way to do it but I'd be really curious to see how it affects the geometry.
    • Hey Christof and welcome!  Sounds like an awesome project! I'm not sure many of the regular users on here would know much about the HK but I could be wrong.  Looking forward to updates.
  • Create New...