Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I finally turned my boss and a work mate over to the darkside of the FORCEd induction performance scene, they both sold there V8 HSV's and bought new XR6 turbos.

Now they both want to increase boost but are concerned with the many stories about the engine and gear box's blowing up, are they rumours and do you know of anyone running higher boost? One has an auto the other manual.

Is it true that FORD can tell if the car has seen more boost at service time?

Any info would be good as I've promised that there turbo can produce some good kw, now I'm a little concerned that the rest of the car might break?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9282-anyone-modified-an-xr6-turbo/
Share on other sites

The ECUs have some sort of grub screw that require a special tool to remove. If these have been tampered with then the dealership knows boost etc has been fiddled with. Also the throttle body is fly by wire, adding further complexity to tuning the car without resorting to aftermarket ecu.

A friend that works for the gearbox supplier who supply Ford and who worked on the turbo tells me there is already a Tickford engineer who is about to go out on his own producing parts for the new XR6 turbo as he knows the ways around the Ford ECU and other OE parts/problems.

Martin Donnon of Zoom/HPI/Hot 4s has purchased one o no doubt we will be reading about possible mods shortly

I heard a whisper but its reliability is questionable but the stock turbo (Garrett GT40) can handle 800hp....

Anyway as im sure you've heard, the manual gearbox apparently isnt up to handling any increases in power. The auto gearbox is another matter however as its meant to be a pretty good and hard wearing 'box at that.

6psi is standard boost which equates to 240Kw, rumour has it 270-300Kw has been seen on the Ford dyno in its prototype stages. However im not sure whether this was done through upping the boost. Longevity of other parts may begin to be an issue from this point on. Keep in mind however that they have to keep the XR8 as the pinnacle car of the range - thus keeping the XR6T to under 260Kw, so im sure you can safely wind up the XR6T to surpass the XR8.

As for the Ford mechanics knowing about any increases in boost - that is correct. All functions of all cars are stored within the car's computer and a diagnostic test during a service will hightlight any discrepancies.

The auto gearbox is another matter however as its meant to be a pretty good and hard wearing 'box at that.

My mate loves it when hears this as he works on the auto trans. He also tells me the poor old 5 speed is at an end for handling the torque of the turbo. So stick with a weak clutch as the box wont handle much more.

He also told me the things he was driving to calibrate the box and do R&D on was a lot quicker then the magazines are claiming. He has driven my 32 and advises if an XR6 pulls up alongside me start going thru my CD collection as ill get burned BIG TIME (i cant drive so never race anyway, + scared of the boys in blue...)

i could be wrong, but i heard there is some restriction placed on the turbo, on the intake or exhaust, i dont know, where there is like a choker, that reduces the diameter of the intake/outlet, removing this may see quicker boost.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...