Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys.

I am buying a GTR engine, and was wondering if anyone could tell me the differences between the r32 gtr engine and r33 gtr engine. Apart form the age difference is there any difference? Any physical changes? power or anything at all? Ohh and sorry but 1 last thing, do the v-specs have any more power thasn the standard engine in the r33 range? Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thanks

Cheers Mark

Edited by markjh27

Ok. Whatever i post, im getting it from the latest GTR special Issue of HPI. just want to clear that up now.

The V-spec (in the 33 at least) has the active diff and different ATTESA system. Doesnt say anything about power. But there was an N1 special which did have upgraded turbos, suspension tweaks better water and oil pumps. only a few hundred were made.

Both the 32 and 33 have 206kw@6800

torque: 32 = 353Nm@4400

33 = 368Nm@4400

redline: 32 = 7500/8000

33 = 8000

i personally dont know much about the differences, its all from HPI. This is what it says, and they know more than me as its their job, so it looks good.

enjoy

r33 engine has the larger crank drive for the oil pump, this makes oil pumps last alot longer as the engagement is alot sturdier. Everything else engine wise is the same from an internals point of view. r33 has pull clutch unlike th r32 which is push. Power wise the engines are the same.

r33 engine has the larger crank drive for the oil pump, this makes oil pumps last alot longer as the engagement is alot sturdier. Everything else engine wise is the same from an internals point of view. r33 has pull clutch unlike th r32 which is push. Power wise the engines are the same.

yeah thats what i've read, the crank is a bit different for the oil pump. the pull/push type clutch is to do with the gearbox not really the engine...

but i have read that later R32 GTR engines changed to the pull type clutch? and probably the newer R33 crank.

yeah the latest r32s had the pull clutch.

The only real difference is the oil pump drive is larger on the 33 and you can always get the 32 crank modified to work the same way.

Re the water pump I had the same problem, the 33 water pump has an additional hole (slotted) that I needed to weld up, so the must be an extra bolt hole in the 33 block.

Otherwise all identical, nothing that affects power output.

I also saw that HPI article and I have never read such a load of garbage. Imagine comparing a 5yo to a 10yo to a 15yo engine by running them on a dyno, then claiming the newest engines are the best.

Crack the engine open you will find its all the same inside....which means a well re-built 32 engine will outperform a second hand 34 engine every day.

Late model 32's have the 33 crank , how do i know ? The 32 engines have different oil pick up strainer , its different where it mounts on the block . The 32 has a groove and it uses an 0 ring as a seal , the 33 is flat and it uses a gasket . I have had an engine with the earlier strainer , 32 water pump and the 33 crank and it wasnt changed i'm sure on that as the engine was original .

Duncan , i'm not so sure that the cil head is the same ( not saying its not though ) and the dumps are different . Overall though there is not much difference in all the rb 26's , the main reason for making more power in the 33 + 34 is the tune and more boost .

You are correct on the hpi crap , they say that the 34 turbos are steel wheeled as well , how would they know ?

Some guy was arguing with me about the 34 turbos , he said it was a well documented fact that they are steel wheeled because hpi said so , some people believe everything they read .

hey guys,

first of all thank you for your info. I was greatly appreciated. I have just bought today a R33 GTR V-Spec engine which is supposedly out of a 98' model. I don't know how to makje sure it's v-spec or if it's really 98 or a r32 model. Anyone know how i can find this out? it is out of a half cut.

Ohh and what motul ol do ppl use in these motors? Whats best?

thank you all for ur help.

You are correct on the hpi crap , they say that the 34 turbos are steel wheeled as well , how would they know ?

Well they do have a steel intake wheels and ceramic exhaust wheels. My room mate bought a set off a friend of mine when he changed to 2530s on his 2001 Vspec II, as his 32 GTR spat its turbos.

yep all GTRs have steel impellor/ceramic exhaust turbos, except the N1 versions :D

wrxhoon I would be *very* interested to know if there were any head differences, I have never had 2 together at the same time. Thanks for the other differences you found, that is interesting....but of course none of them would affect the performance of the motor.

Yes there were differences in engine externals between 32, 33 and 34 but we are talking engine differences. External differences included turbos, dumps, exhausts, ECU tune, boost

You are right Duncan on the turbo bit but nur-specs have steel wheeled turbos as well .

I have had 32 +33 cil heads off the car but not side by side so i can only go on i have heard , thats why i said i'm not sure if they are the same or not . I never had a 34 head off the car so i cant say on that for sure .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...