Jump to content
SAU Community

gutting cat converter


Recommended Posts

If you have a hi-flow cat then the piping should be 3", if you can managed to weld a piece of 3" pipe inside the cat then it wouldn't be restrictive at all. There will be a small performance edge in doing this, but may not be worth your while unless you have a high-horsepower car.

See'ya:burnout:

Please please please don't do this.

It's really bad for our environment, makes your car smell like sh1t, and you can cop a $10,000 fine for it...

Plus unless you have a highly, HIGHLY modified car, you won't gain more than 5-10kw, and that's being generous.

Originally posted by Duncan

Run NOS, the fine is cheaper and the increase larger

AAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Works,

Did you notice any difference in performance? I'm planning on doing this cause I'm going to run rotational idle, but I'll still have something which looks like a cat for the cops. I can't imagine that the fumes would be much worse either.

See'ya:burnout:

Due to the age of my car i dont have to run cats (thats what rta said because i did check as the cat adr came in after the yr of my car) and the only time my car smells is on warm/start up.

As Andrew said it is a big fine for a few more KW and it will stand out as all hell if a cop spots the flame out the ass end of your car.

Yes the flame looks dam good but is it worth it in the end? :)

If your going to worry about the environment sell your car and buy a push bike ;)

If your going to the track get a pipe section made up so you can remove the cat (would take 5mins) if it worrys you that much and swap it back to the cat for the street.

definately a louder, crisper note. droning is caused by mufflers/resonators or anything that impacts the flow of your exhaust gas, so removing the cat is more than likely going to reduce the drone of your exhaust.

environmental issues is the usual argument that comes up when mentioning removing cats. fact is... catalytic converters have a limited working lifespan, which is approx 100,000klms for oem units, and usually less for aftermarket items. how many cars on the road do u think replace their catalytic converter every 2-3 years? yep, none. unburnt fuel can also melt the core of the catalytic converter. so those guys with huge camshaft overlap, or running insanely rich mixtures (which will include most ppl with skylines :)), will more than likely have an almost useless cat anyway.

headaches? doubt it, more likely to be an exhaust leak somewhere under the car, maybe the gutted cat wasn't reinstalled with the gaskets?

other than the possibility of a fine, i personally cannot see a reason to not remove your cat... (that is unless it's just for the flames :) )

been tempted to do it with the ute, i used to run hi flowing cats on my auto ute and it had bulk top end mumbo :P

Might get some Cat replacement pipes made up for "drag" usage and then just get my spare set of cats, remove the cover and get put it around the pipe so when i drive to and from the drags i dont get cop hassles :)

For me though cat/no cat is almost pointless as when cold the cats dont work anyway and by time i get to work they only just start heating up ahah..

Eitherway I'd keep 2 sets of pipes for race/drag use and for daily driving. But for fun i'd go no cat for a bit just so i can get footage of flames ;)

flames and quicker turbo spool up. Top end flow is increased as well.

If you look inside the catalytic it is quite a restrictive peice of work. Having a de-cat pipe or better still a flame thrower is good for off street work. If the exhaust joint does a nice 3 bolt flange and give you some spare gaskets its only a 10min job so you can stay legal on the street and go wild at the track.

Does the plex allow you to run dump pipes/flame throwers these days?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...