Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

and as ive heard from people comparing garrett with hks turbos, is the hks ones will keep on pumping more hp at high boost, where as the garrett stuff runs outta puff at high boost levels and flattens off.

indeed, and there was a massive thread on it about 1.5 years ago.

But from what ive seen the Garretts arent a lot different to thier HKS counterparts. They are both well engineered products

I found the HKS TO4Z Product Information blurb at  http://www.roggan.net/TO4Z.pdf  . Some interesting pics and graphs but sadly no compressor map .

Cheers Adrian .

Keep in mind thats the HKS T04Z NOT the Garret T04Z...

:D

Yes true , but the cartridge (wheels) seem to be the same . The thing to look into is what Garrett offer in the way of exhaust housings , the HKS version is not like normal twin entry turbine housings - the divider does not go all the way around the inside of the volute or internal passage . If you look at the pics of the HKS housing the outside of the volute is quite narrow for the flanges dimensions and inlet holes . To get the housing to flow the gas the nozzle section must be wide meaning greater turbine tip height . I'd say this must be why they chose to use the larger TO4 sized flange rather than a more compact T3 twin entry type .

Provided Garretts twin entry housings are similar style they should do similar things for the same ARR . Notice the difference in the compressor covers , big difference in size given that the same ARR is used for a wheel of the same basic dimensions . The port shroud design looks pretty and would not be hard for a machinist to copy .

Still need to see the cartridge itself and the housings (esp exhaust) from the inside .

Cheers from Parkes , A .

Yes true , but the cartridge (wheels) seem to be the same . The thing to look into is what Garrett offer in the way of exhaust housings , the HKS version is not like normal twin entry turbine housings - the divider does not go all the way around the inside of the volute or internal passage . If you look at the pics of the HKS housing the outside of the volute is quite narrow for the flanges dimensions and inlet holes . To get the housing to flow the gas the nozzle section must be wide meaning greater turbine tip height . I'd say this must be why they chose to use the larger TO4 sized flange rather than a more compact T3 twin entry type . 

Provided Garretts twin entry housings are similar style they should do similar things for the same ARR . Notice the difference in the compressor covers , big difference in size given that the same ARR is used for a wheel of the same basic dimensions . The port shroud design looks pretty and would not be hard for a machinist to copy .

Still need to see the cartridge itself and the housings (esp exhaust) from the inside .

Cheers from Parkes , A .

Finally got pics of the wheels . Compressor looks a little like a big trim GT wheel though the splitter blades sit a bit lower . The turbine looks a lot like a TO4 P trim .

Cheers A .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't think the shuffle can damage the turbos. It only happens at low shaft speeds and loads. It's just annoying (to some people - others are tickled by the effect) and it quite possibly reduces spool performance a little bit.
    • Oh dear. The panel beating needs to be done before the filler work. Do you have a photo of the dent before you started? Hard enough to not flex and only hit the high spots?  What do you mean it was just temporary? 
    • Can u check this way it works for power supply?
    • These coils draw 10amps that what i read online
    • I appreciate the detailed explanation, think I understand now. I spent the better part of last night reading what I could about shuffle and potential solutions. I had replaced the OEM twin turbo pipe with an alternate Y pipe that is separated further away from the turbo. The current one is from HKS and I had a previous pipe that was separated even further away, both have shuffle. I had heard that a divider can be welded in to the OEM pipe to remove turbulence, and figure that aftermarket pipes that are more separated would achieve the same thing. From what I read, most people with -10 turbos get shuffle due to their size, though it's a bit less common with -5s on a standard RB26. I think Nismoid mentioned somewhere it's because OEM recirculation piping is common in Australia with -5 cars. It seems that the recommendation tends to vary between a few options, which I've ordered in what I think is most feasible for me:  1. Retune the MAP or boost controller to try to eliminate shuffle 2. Install OEM recirculation piping 3. Something called a 'balance pipe' welded onto the exhaust manifolds. I don't know if kits for this are available, seems like pure fabrication work 4. simply go single turbo My current layout is as follows: Garrett 2860 -5s HKS Racing Suction intake MAF delete pipes HKS racing chamber intake piping hard intercooler piping,  ARC intercooler HKS SSQV BOV and pipe Haltech 2500 elite ECU and boost solenoid/controller HPI dump pipes OEM exhaust manifolds HKS VCAM step 1 and supporting head modifications Built 2.6 bottom end All OEM recirculation piping was removed, relevant areas sealed off I'll keep an eye out for any alternative solutions but can get started with this.  Only other question is, does shuffle harm the turbo (or anything else)? It seems like some people say your turbo shafts will explode because of the opposing forces after a while and others say they just live with it and adjust their pedal foot accordingly. 
×
×
  • Create New...