Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 156
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Specifications

Engine

Type: V12

Displacement cu in (cc): 365 (5988)

Power bhp (kW) at RPM: 660(485) / 7800

Torque lb-ft (Nm) at RPM: 484(657) / 5500

Redline at RPM: 8200

Brakes & Tires

Brakes F/R: ABS, vented disc/vented disc

Tires F-R: 245/35 ZR19 - 345/35 ZR19

Exterior Dimensions & Weight

Length × Width × Height in: 185.1 × 80.1 × 45.2

Weight lb (kg): 2766 (1255)

Driveline: Rear Wheel Drive

Performance

Acceleration 0-62 mph s: 3.65

Top Speed mph (km/h): 225 (362)

Fuel Economy EPA city/highway mpg (l/100 km): n.a. (23)

ferrarienzo.jpg

ferrarienzo_04.jpg

ferrarienzo_seats.jpg

ferrarienzo_inter.jpg

i think the interior is really nice for such a cheap car

nothing is wrong with it....ive seen them go in very good condition for $5k with RWC and 12 months rego

My mate got one for his first car, he got it for 8k! and that was without reg + RWC, when he sees this he will be pretty pissed.

5k is cheap as. Maybe its that cheap because its red?

the only downside is that apparently their known for their engine and gearbox problems. I heard they are really rough, thats why they dont hold their re sale value. Its a pity, its one of those cars that look good but are really a lemon.

Edited by Paradizzle

Hey, i dont know why all these guys are giving you a hard time, ill let my car go for 3k. My parents are making me sell it, they say its too dangerous and i sorta got nowhere to live until i sell it. So yeah.

the car makes just over 500rkw on 2bar boost. Breaks traction in 5th gear on street tyres.

Tried to get it dyno'd at 4bar boost, but the car came off the dyno rollers, luckily we stopped it in time before it hit anything. So its got alot more potentional.

The engine is stock, the turbo has been changed tho. The engines are good for like 1500rwkw.

the car is in my pic

Mate stick to the Aussie cars, atleast you know where they're from and what they are like. Believe me, you can get a VS Commodore for around 7K, thats value for money. Forget about these highly modified cars for 3K. You'll have problems like engine failures, blown tires etc

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...