Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 168
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

of course with progameable ecus you would retune the car when using a higher octane fuel... especially if you want to take advantage of the higer octane.... your stupid to think a totally differant fuel wouldnt cause problems.

why would a higher RON rated fuel cause problems?

If my car is tuned for 98RON, and I use 92RON, then yes it will.

But if it is tuned for 98RON, and I use 100RON, then the chances of pinging decrease, not increase.

The whole point to all of this is:

- Shell brought out a variant of optimax with 5% Ethanol.

- Nissan recomends we don't use it

- Some of us experienced problems with ethanol blended fuels.

I've ran 91 octane ULP.

It ran exactly the same.

The only difference being when you stick your foot in to it, she pings. :)

There's no reason why the car should run badly with an ethanol mix.

Edited by Cubes
ummm.... 100ron.... aint japanesse fuel an even higher rating... why would our cars have a problem with it........ obviously its just tuning... reset the ecu should be fine... it will return to factory specs... as in japanesse factory specs where the fuel is a higher octane rating...

There won't be a problem, just to make use of the higher RON you'd probably want to tune up a little.

as for the ethonol... the media gave it the name its got...... id rather see the FACTs on this fuel.. strait from the product producer..... i dont think it would do much damage at all.... and seriously guys.... most of you would rebuild you engine before the effects this fuel supposably has are noticed....

I don't know about you but I tend to take the claims of the company that makes the product with a grain of salt... or a handful. The only reason ethanol is in petrol because johnny howard went to school with the biggest ethanol producing company's owner and has a few other 'mates'. Why would the people making ethanol tell you it's crap?

what im trying to say is why is there this big no no about it..... why would they put ethonol in fuel if damage caused by it could come back bite them in the arse.

and have nissan got proof it causes damage.... in fact i havent seen any proof. if someone prove me wrong id stand corrected. and you seem to be the only person that had a problem with this fuel so far.

look proven wrong i will stand corrected... but ive used ethonol fuel in my car for a long time.. dont have a problem with it.

I've ran 91 octane ULP.

It ran exactly the same.

The only difference being when you stick your foot in to it, she pings. :)

Then it's not exactly the same is it.

There's no reason why the car should run badly with an ethanol mix.

What fact is that assertion based on?

Some info here.

http://www.raa.net/page.asp?TerID=146

The thing that will keep me off it is because it's just a way to make money for the 'boys'... the only reason we're getting ethanol is because we can produce it, howard's mates make it, they whack a tariff on it to stop cheap shit coming in from brasil.. ... there's no reason to use it other than that? Maybe reducing emissions but if you wanted to reduce emissions wouldn't you just switch to full ethanol?

what im trying to say is why is there this big no no about it..... why would they put ethonol in fuel if damage caused by it could come back bite them in the arse.

and have nissan got proof it causes damage.... in fact i havent seen any proof. if someone prove me wrong id stand corrected. and you seem to be the only person that had a problem with this fuel so far.

There are several report floating around that show it causes damage.

Edited by Zahos

Here's a link.

http://www.deh.gov.au/atmosphere/fuelquali.../materials.html

That's with 20% ....

Why WOULD you use it is the question. Things have been working fine now - why would you switch? When you look at the reasons they are pushing it (politics and cronyism) there's no reason to move?

I'm willing to be swayed but .. heh have a look at the pics :)

and then..

http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2003/s922066.htm

http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/08/...0588321375.html

... you make up your mind

Exactly.

There are so many bullshit posts in this thread already, some of which are answers obviously pulled from ones arse, but this is the plain, undeniable fact that should prevent any of us from using it.

Your car is not designed for it, so dont use it!

WTF?

Mate, Ive tried E98 fuel once, with 50% BP 98, it felt different, but ok. I wouldnt use it all the time though, only if your down to the last drop (as I was when I used it) and need some fuel.

To refer to posts as being bullshit is a tad extreme........

Zahos

i dont know why oyu have such a facination with ass's but seriously keep that to your self.

but just because you havent taken the time to reslove the problem when it could be a simple reset or retune doesnt mean you should deter people from using it. other people dont spend there day facinating over the male anatomy and usualy have time to fix little problems..

i use ethonol based fuel myself.... and when 100ron gets here ill used that aswell... dont see why i should stop others from using it jsut because i gota put a little effort in.. especially when in theory you should get a power gain.

I have used 10% Ethanol 98 from SAFF/Liberty servo's here in SA

First experience was a full tank (51 litres)

The car went well. Knock on the PFC was normal, water temp was normal

Economy was pretty poor, mainly due to the fact that I was giving it a bit to see if it knocked or not

I have used it a various times since, mostly with a bit of BP in the tank, and its been fine, economy has been within ~30kms a tank of what I'd get with BP98

Best bet is to everyone make up your own minds on this one

Early cases in the eastern states of engine failure where attributed to servo's running 40-50% mixes of the stuff

One thing I have noticed is that it on copper plugs the E10 fuel is A OK, on platinums, well it ran a little rough so I switched back to good ol' copper plugs

Maybe thats where there is confusion, what plugs is everyone running that has experienced probs with the Ethanol fuels?

WTF?

Mate, Ive tried E98 fuel once, with 50% BP 98, it felt different, but ok. I wouldnt use it all the time though, only if your down to the last drop (as I was when I used it) and need some fuel.

Refer to post #30

To refer to posts as being bullshit is a tad extreme........

Not really. There are people quoting it's safe without any evidence.

I didn't quote why it is bad either. I regurgetated the car manufacturers recomendation, and explained my experience.

I don't care if anyone uses it and gains 5 seconds on their quarter mile pass... infact, good luck to anyone if they do.

If you have used it with no problems so far, then I'm happy for you to... (really, I'm not being sarcastic)

Edited by Zahos
other people dont spend there day facinating over the male anatomy and usualy have time to fix little problems..

Don't females have arses?

i use ethonol based fuel myself.... and when 100ron gets here ill used that aswell... dont see why i should stop others from using it jsut because i gota put a little effort in.. especially when in theory you should get a power gain.

What theory?

Did you read this theory?

Who wrote it, was it a creditable source?

What did this theory say exactly?

Edited by Zahos
Refer to post #30

But when people start making assertions that could potentialy cause damage to others based on "It felt OK in my car that time", it just stupid, and it is bullshit.

aint you doing similar to just that... you had a problem but millions of others that have been using it for sometime now havent.... funny that.....

"it just stupid, and, it is bullshit."
lmao.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The ATTESSA is functionally identical to R34; there were a bunch of JDM models that continued ATTESSA including Fuga/Q70, Skyline/Q50, Cima etc as an option. All with Auto only and I think mostly for snow regions. AFAIK there were no AWD VR30DDTT sold in Australia - it is on my to do list to check regs for racing a LHD car in Targa/ATR/AASA/CAMS events because if I can get the auto to work it would be interesting to run a 4wd car The Ecuteck TCM tuning is the same model as their ECU tuning, they already have it for R35 and Dose's favourite, BMW. You buy "points" to allow your computer to be tuned, buy either a bluetooth (phone app) or bluetooth+USB+Key (phone and PC) dongle, and pay for a tune that will be locked to your tuner ( ). You can also access the tuning software yourself but 1. it is mega expensive and 2. these computers have a billion parameters that intersect, so how could you ever spend enough time on it to get a decent result.
    • Or, is it a case of what it is like owning an R series Skyline? NFI what the previous owner has done or fiddled with... Ha ha ha After reading through this thread, I went on a bit of a research about the Q50/Q60. Now I'm quite intrigued by them! Is the AWD in them more like a WRX where it's always AWD, or is it more like the ATTESSA in the GTRs? By the sound of this TCU tuning, this sounds like a case of someone has made some real software for it, and you just need the right piece of hardware, and then you license that specific vehicle/TCU. Or is this a case of the software will be really expensive so only a few tuners have it, and you still have to pay a license per vehicle?
    • By popular demand.. it was a coil. Got my hands on 1 new OEM coil, replaced with the one that made the less noise difference when I unplugged it while the car was running and started the car up. No stutter and the engine light was gone. I guess I’ll buy the other 5 they have lol
    • No, code 21 is very straightforward. It can only be the things described in that diagnostic flow. In fact it has no way of knowing that the spark plug resistance is out of spec.
    • Hi, SteveL Thank you very much for your reply, you seem to be the only person on the net who has come up with a definitive answer for which I am grateful. The "Leak" was more by way of wet bubbles when the pedal was depressed hard by a buddy while trying to gey a decent pedal when bleeding the system having fitted the rebuilt BM50 back in the car, which now makes perfect sense. A bit of a shame having just rebuilt my BM50, I did not touch the proportioning valve side of things, the BM50 was leaking from the primary piston seal and fluid was running down the the Brake booster hence the need to rebuild, I had never noticed any fluid leaking from that hole previously it only started when I refitted it to the car. The brake lines in the photo are "Kunifer" which is a Copper/Nickel alloy brake pipe, but are only the ones I use to bench bleed Master cylinders, they are perfectly legal to use on vehicles here in the UK, however the lines on the car are PVF coated steel. Thanks again for clearing this up for me, a purchase of a new BMC appears to be on the cards, I have been looking at various options in case my BM50 was not repairable and have looked at the HFM BM57 which I understand is manufactured in Australia.  
×
×
  • Create New...