Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi, my car is a S1 R33 GTS25t and the BOV in question is a Blizt DD. After intalling the BOV when breaking into a shape corners the engine will stave of air and stall on me. I have try this a number of times and it still stall on me BTW the car is AUTO. I think it's the hose overheating or the ECU is not use to the BOV yet. I have reset the ecu and will test some more on the weekend. did anyone have any problem like this before? maybe because i'm not running a pod.

Also can anyone please attach a pic of the engine bay with apexi pod installed with stock AFM.

Thanks in advance.

atmo bov you have. atmo bov no worky. it vents air, the engine expects that air is still be there so it adds fuel / timing to suit however the air is not present so it runs too rich and stalls. fix use stock bov

dude, you can't fix it.

Well, actually you can. Either plumb back your BOV or put the stock one on.

Why would you bother putting a loud fully sik OMG!!!!111oneoneone!!!11 BOV on a auto anyway.

Do you drive around, foot flat, and taking it off the throttle quickly to make your BOV vent on purpose when there are some fully sic chiks around?

Let me guess, you're a poser?

hhmmm

atmo bov you have. atmo bov no worky. it vents air, the engine expects that air is still be there so it adds fuel / timing to suit however the air is not present so it runs too rich and stalls. fix use stock bov

This is why your Fully sic BOV is making your car stall. You run an AFM before the BOV, it measures air that is gonig into the motor and the ECU puts fuel and timing in to suit.. Use a Vent to ATMO BOV and it takes away this air and leaves the fuel behind..

And what do you know.. that fuel doesn't have that air anymore to burn, so it stalls, pops, farts, and carries on.

If you want to run a fully sic ATMO bov, get a powerfc d-jetro and run a MAF at the throttle body.

That'll make the chicks look....

oh and if your wondering why your getting a lot of smart assed answers...Next time, try using the SEARCH function, this topic has been covered about 34568938930295345 times, by people that have no idea about the car they drive. They think you just turn the key and the wheels go magically. And they also seem to think that if you install a Vent to atmo BOV all the chicks will line up and want to ride with you.

lol can't believe I typed all of that.

Edited by The Mafia

why does everyone say use the stock? If he wants the sound, he is entitled to it.

It's all about the setting of the BOV. I got a Greddy Type-S and my car doesn't stall at all! It's all about adjustment, tighten the spring and it should stop stalling, but don't tighten too tight otherwise it'll flutter and the BOV isn't actually doing its job.

The only side effect of an atmo BOV is that it'll be rich when the BOV vents, and you may get a bit of backfire, especially after letting off on hard throttle.. but being an auto, you won't get rich conditions on gear changes.

having said that, yeah, he should get flamed for not searching.

Any Tech feed back? thx

you got it within the first 8 words of the first reply

atmo bov you have. atmo bov no worky.

simply put, you wanna use an ATMO BOV... you'll need to purchase a SAF-c/PowerFC and have the thing tuned so that it wont spit the dummy

This can be found by searching and reading, trust me :blink:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...