Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Originally posted by JiMiH

No way that R34 looks awesome!!  

And that chick has a TIGHT body :D

yes on both accounts..

I read on the intaweb that those R34's where tuned by a jap performance house, they are supposed to be da shit bro.. Cant remember the name of the company or people that did tho..

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

That pink chick ain't Eva Mendes, it's that Devon Aoki chick, she's got a head like a bag full of spanners with a few nuts and bolts thrown in. And she was a model, so probably acts about as good as that supra looks...(j/k)

But that 34 looks damn nice, i was a bit ho hum at first, but the blue neons don't look that bad, and hey, we all complained cause no GTR's got a real run in the first, now they've got probably the best 34 in the US as the lead, nothing better i say.

Originally posted by JiMiH

No way that R34 looks awesome!!  

And that chick has a TIGHT body :rolleyes:

:Pres-hit:

they changed the supra.. looks like a TRD 3000GT Widebody kit..

that rx7 is alright..

hate the paintjob on the s2000..

but that chick... mmmmmmmmmmm

Yeah they really did their research on the first one, like references to putting SR20's in civics and the all time classic "Motec exhaust" line.

This sorta movie makes japanese car enthusiasts look stupid, im surprised and disappointed in all of you for liking F&F :)

If you want to see a decent car movie, get the original Gone In 60 Seconds out from your video store. 3/4 of the film is a single car chase, its BRILLIANT. :D

Red17

Originally posted by 33Spec2

Hmmmmmmm a lot of piss takin  

I really liked the first one its bout time someone did a good car movie and i think all the cars in the pik look awesome maybe the pink ones not 4 me but more a girls car

I agree with u!! I reckon the 1st one was awesome and from what i see and hear this one will be the same if not better.... If u don't like watching hotted up cars racing, action, chases and that chick stading infront of the s2000 then go watch son of rajab of the Rings!!!!

CHEERS!

Originally posted by summoner

bah get GTA:Vice city, its the dogs bollocks.. esp the bikes :wave:

yer got that too, its good for beating the crap out of people and running amok.. but burnout is good for the highspeed crash's.

i hope there's more crash's in the movie, car crash's make car movies what they are :)

red17, the original 60sec was crap story wise.. probably one of the worst movies ive ever seen, even death race 2000 was better. haha

The car chase was cool though, ill give it credit for that!

Shaun

I love the old "Running on empty" movie that was made in the early eighty's, there is just something different about it, even though it was from the old pushrod V8 days.(maybe its the blind guy that owns the super-charged black 55 chev,scary!!)

Even the "Full metal jacket" another V8 movie that was made a few years ago was not all that bad!, though it even lacked a bit in the story line department it made up for that with the action!

As for "Fast and the furious" seemed to be under reseached for its time and also over cinematized in some areas! As for F&F2 I might just wait until it comes out on DVD cause you get to see more angles of the action in the crash scenes and how they made the movie!

MEGA

"Running on Empty" Yeah, my friend's got a copy of that and I borrowed it to watch about a year ago.

That '55 Chev was awesome, I have to agree - and finding out the old dude was blind was a strange twist of the story.

Where was that movie filmed? I think I read Melbourne in the credits, but some of it looks like the area in The Rocks, around the Sydney Harbour Bridge.

Hmmm, just watched the trailer and the crash at the end is definitely cool. Very scary if it were real life , but seeing as it's just a movie, it's cool.

Devon Aoik has a great bod (from the photos anyway), but it looks like her head was taken off and given a few cycles in a tumble-dryer...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Hello, just just bought an 1999 enr34 with a stock rb25neo and I'm looking to upgrade the engine to 500whp I know some basic things but wondering if there are things I'll need to do to upgrade the stock block and all the bits and pieces to achieve this.
    • Thanks everyone for the replies and suggestions. Got the seats out (hoping I could find some existing grommets but no such luck). By tapping and measuring etc. I could figure out where I could drill through if needed. But first I borrowed an inspection camera and managed to go through factory holes in the chassis rail and could see that the captive nut was holding steady which is why it could retighten. So it was indeed a stripped section of thread, so I applied downforce by levering the bolt head with a screwdriver and went slowly back and forth until it came out. Camera helped a lot cos I could monitor that the captive nut was holding tight. Now I just have one very seized main subframe nut to tackle 😅
    • BOVs do have a purpose, if you ever log pressure before and after the throttle body, you will see a spike pre throttle on lift off from a WOT condition. Enough to bend throttle blades / damage e-throttle motors or simple assist in blowing off cooler pipes. FWIW, the above on really applies to those running at least 2 bar of boost. OP shouldn't have an issue, on the other hand, here are some videos of my shit box over a decade ago with some succulent dose with the airbox on and off. That shit box is unrecognisable these days 🫠    
    • I've tried all different combinations of BOVs/ no BOV and stock bypass valves over the years, on gear changes the stock bypass valve seems to get the car back on boost quicker because in part the turbos wheel speed isn't being slowed down by reversion, although they have issues holding boost much over the stock setting. Most aftermarket BOVs you can adjust the spring, tighter will make it open later and close sooner, but in my experience it'll cause a bit of flutter at low load/rpm anyway. I've also got some input into this whole no bov causing turbo wear, never had an issue on any on my turbos HOWEVER, I got my R33 GTST with 200k kms on it, with from what I can see still has the original turbo, no lateral shaft play but has about 4-5mm of play in and out which to me seems like a worn thrust bearing from years (100-150k kms?) of turbo flutter running no bov, so maybe there is some truth to it in the long run. But that'll never stop me loving the Stutututu while I have the car.   OP just wants to know if he can run a atmo vented BOV with no major issues and the answer is YES, plenty of people do it, there's no harm in installing it and seeing how it runs before spending $$$ on an aftermarket ecu, last time I bought a Nistune it was $2400 for install and a tune , unsure of todays prices but you get me. Crazy money to spend just to fix the minor inconvenience of stalling that can be overcome by letting the revs come down to near idle before putting the clutch in or a little bit of throttle to avoid it. You're better off leaving the ecu and tune for after a bigger turbo/injectors have been installed to take full advantage of the tune and get your moneys worth.   Let OP have his Whoosh sound without trying to break his bank haha
    • I see you missed the rest of the conversation where they have benefits, but nothing to do with avoiding breaking turbos, which is what the aftermarket BOV made all the fan boys, tuners, and modders believe was the only purpose for them...
×
×
  • Create New...