Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey there, finally got around to getting my little R32 Gts-t dynoed today but was a bit disappointed with the result. Here's whats done to it

Intercooler

Blitz Electronic DBC

Apexi Airpod

3" Turbo back Exhaust

High flow cat

Stock ECU

98Octane fuel

Was running 14 PSI on the EBC but according to the dyno the maximum it reached was 11. The guy seemed to think that the stock ECU might be preventing it from boosting any higher but i thought you guys might know if that were true or not, or whether I should be looking at something else. He also said the boost could possibly be leaking somewhere.

Anyway here's the dyno graph, sorry about the quality it was taken with a webcam. Max RWKW is 121.4, but I was expecting 140+ Is there any indication on the graph of something terribly wrong?

dyno.jpg

Edited by Lithius

Whats with the dip at about 100k's? Big missfire?

If the dyno is saying you are running 11psi then i reckon your gauge is probably reading a bit high, My blitz dsbc reads very high.

Everything else looks good. Swap your plugs for a set of bcpr6es, wind in a bit more boost, set your base timing to about 16btdc and try it again.

In the meantime, do a compression test (while you are swapping the plugs).

Your current setup is good for about 160rwkw on 13-14psi if your engine is healthy.

doesn't seem right... I just had mine dyno'd and I got 138.8kw with a pretty stock car.. only have a FMIC , pod and 3inch exhaust, its running at 12psi. It originally ran 120kw.. on first run... second run pulled a higher figure..

I'd say the timing is out a little bit, thats where you would expect to gain power. 2 or 3 degrees out will mean big power losses

Looks like a bit of a miss at ~100, maybe swap or gap down your plugs

Other than that, as always, dyno's are best used for before and after, to see gains/losses

Should have dyno'd it before doing all your mods

What sort of condition is your clutch in? Not slipping is it?

Brand new Extreme heavy duty clutch, old one shit itself not long after it was imported. Just found out my boost controller is in % not PSI... so i've been running 14% which explains the difference in boost between it and the dyno. I still think 120 is low for 11PSI though.

So i might try changing the sparkplugs, winding up the boost a bit more etc. What's involved in changing the timing and a compression test? Any idea of a rough price?

Edited by Lithius

Shootout mode will give you a result that 'should' be comparable to other dyno runs in shootout mode

Wouldnt waste your time with a comp. test, as long as its not blowing smoke

Timing is adjusted via the crank angle sensor, on the exhaust side of your engine (if looking at it front on)

The Crank angle sensor that round thing with 3 screws holding it to your timing belt cover

This needs to be adjusted with a timing light

To put a new set of plugs in and adjust the timing shouldn't cost more than $100, the plugs you can DIY if you are hand with a spanner

I think it was done in shootout mode, it's hard to read 'cause of my shoddy camera work but down the bottom it says "Results plotted using dyno dynamics shootout mode"

Thanks for the advice guys, i will get some new plugs into her and look into getting the timing altered. will report back with any news.

It's not blowing any smoke.

Edited by Lithius

If you've got the plugs out, do a comp test. It's worth the time to do it and you will know that your engine is relatively healthy. Checking the health of your engine is never a waste of time.

new copper plugs will cost under 30 bucks. Get the timing checked on the dyno and adjusted at the same time if it's out, if it costs an extra 20 bucks over a regular power run i'd be surprised. Same for playing with the boost.

Hey I was just playing around with it then, trying to dial in 13-14PSI on my boost controller and checking it with both my boost gauge and the boost controllers boost metre, and it's now getting up about 13PSI, but is not holding it. Even tho i'm still revving higher the boost starts to drop (it dropped to about 8PSI before I stopped revving)

Does this indicate a boost leak or something else?

my r32 peaks at 12psi, but drops to 9psi by the time i get to 5000rpm. i was told theres a restriction in my intake path (most likely intercooler) but now that ive got a fmic, it still does it. i dont know what the problem is. but youre not alone! :P

although, my car made 145kw with cat back, pod and standard intercooler, so in my opinion something sounds a bit out for your car :P

s.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...