Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 88
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I would also like to thank abo bob for all the hard work he put in getting the day running to start with and will be in next time

hear hear, ive already pm'd Adam regarding this subject and was surprised by his response in this thread. I always appreciate the work he does for us regardless of whether or not it got called off.

this thread is annoying... who cares why it was cancelled.

the fact is that it was and its in the past now, what i would like to concentrate on is getting our money back!

Adam, im sure 50 angry letter demanding a refund would help with that, would it not?

I see Paul's point and despite agreeing that the correct decision was made to cancel the day, the fact that the club was to lose $1300-odd by cancelling the event on the day justifies his view that they could have waited a little longer just in case things got better. Either way the cancellation charges were due. Personally, I didn't mind the cancellation as it gave me more time to prepare my car more to my satisfaction.

But this is all in hindsight, so perhaps we can learn from it and can use the experience to make the next drag day better.

I should be at WSID Wednesday week for a run or two.

i am going to shout this for the deaf people

I WALKED THE TRACK, THE STARTING AREA HAD LOST ALL ITS RUBBER AND WAS NOT FIT FOR QUICK TIMES, I AS WOULD AND OTHER CARS MAKING OVER 260 RWHP LET ALONE 470RWHP WOULD NOT HAVE RUN QUICK TIMES, MEANING A THE TRACK WAS POINTLESS FOR TESTING.

thank christ it was called off, as i am only down my tow car fuel bill, and not an additional $250 can of race fuel, more passes on my drivetrain and engine to run shit times on a track that wasnt going to be quick.

i am too disappointed it didnt happen as i am always up for racing, but based on the information provided, ie track conditions and probability of rain it was the best decision to cancel.

is it getting through yet, even though it didnt rain, no one would have run quick due to the extremely poor track condition, hell one of the quicker cars could have had an accident, and instead of being $200 $600 or $800 down, you could have been down a $50k car or $130k car and been in hospital feeding rom a tube.

Shane, the cranky cressida driver. time for a cuppa

and I thought that there was only wankers at drift days!

how does one person shit people off so much

Adam, I and many others appreciate the the effort you have put into organising the day.

look forward to smoking some tyres next year.

Did anyone float the idea to have each pit crew and spectators donate $5 each for another day to cover the washed out event.

50 cars potentially equals 250 "extras"

250 x $5 = $1250.

Just a thought.

El Bee

Did anyone float the idea to have each pit crew and spectators donate $5 each for another day to cover the washed out event.

50 cars potentially equals 250 "extras"

250 x $5 = $1250.

Just a thought.

El Bee

great idea...count me in for that.

Elbee, I actually thought of such a charge. Another idea was to allow 2 other spectators at $15 each. 2 x 50 x 15 = $1500. Would cover the cancellation fees plus the food and bread for the BBQ. But the $5 per spectator sounds alot more fair and reasonable. Anything that will help the club recover any losses is a good idea.

Sounds good Laurie.

Paul - I think your first comment was wrong; not wrong to make, wrong in fact. You are of course entitled to your opinion. I am perhaps a little sensitive because I put in a huge amount of effort for no reward, and I 'm not saying you or anyone else is unappreciative of that, but criticisms don't hit lightly in that situation.

There is no need for any of us to bicker. I stand by my decision as the right one in the circumstances and I know that I have many people behind me in this regard. Let's all look forward to the next one.

As for letters to WSID. Let's wait a little longer for a response from WSID and go from there.

Fatz - if I had an engine I'd be there.

Charlie - Either way the cancellation charges were not due. That is the issue here. I was told that until the first car races down the strip we had not spent our money. If we had waited longer there would have been more charges attributed to us although I didn't know that at the time. If I had known that they would try to charge us that money I would have cancelled at 7am instead of 9am which would have reduced the charges by about $1000 but I suspect would not have reduced the money Paul spent.

John from WSID told me that there was enough misty sort of rain at several times on the day to indicate that had we decided to race it would have been a virtual washout due to stoppages while they redried the track so no matter which way you apply hindsight, it was still the right decision.

Anyway, cheer up people. We haven't given up on motor racing kind of fun yet.

Sounds good Laurie.

Paul - I think your first comment was wrong; not wrong to make, wrong in fact.  You are of course entitled to your opinion.  I am perhaps a little sensitive because I put in a huge amount of effort for no reward, and I 'm not saying you or anyone else is unappreciative of that, but criticisms don't hit lightly in that situation.

There is no need for any of us to bicker.  I stand by my decision as the right one in the circumstances and I know that I have many people behind me in this regard.  Let's all look forward to the next one.

As for letters to WSID.  Let's wait a little longer for a response from WSID and go from there.

Fatz - if I had an engine I'd be there.

Charlie - Either way the cancellation charges were not due.  That is the issue here.  I was told that until the first car races down the strip we had not spent our money.  If we had waited longer there would have been more charges attributed to us although I didn't know that at the time.  If I had known that they would try to charge us that money I would have cancelled at 7am instead of 9am which would have reduced the charges by about $1000 but I suspect would not have reduced the money Paul spent.

John from WSID told me that there was enough misty sort of rain at several times on the day to indicate that had we decided to race it would have been a virtual washout due to stoppages while they redried the track so no matter which way you apply hindsight, it was still the right decision.

Anyway, cheer up people.  We haven't given up on motor racing kind of fun yet.

Thanks for the reply Adam, appreciate your acknowledgement of my right of opinion. Lets try and sort this crap out as Sport Compact in general seems to be getting the short end of the stick as far as WSID is concerned. Shane 1JZ-747 suggested we all turn in to knuckle-dragging V8 bone heads or move to Willowbank, neither of those options appeal to me. This facility is owned by the tax payers of NSW (State Government) not the "management comittee" apointed to run it. I suggest drafting a letter to the Minister of Sport and Recreation enlightening them to the going's on out there and the constant battle we have persuing out sport of choice. Enough is enough!

Edited by DiRTgarage
Thanks for the reply Adam, appreciate your acknowledgement of my right of opinion. Lets try and sort this crap out as Sport Compact in general seems to be getting the short end of the stick as far as WSID is concerned. Shane 1JZ-747 suggested we all turn in to knuckle-dragging V8 bone heads or move to Willowbank, neither of those options appeal to me. This facility is owned by the tax payers of NSW (State Government) not the "management comittee" apointed to run it. I suggest drafting a letter to the Minister of Sport and Recreation enlightening them to the going's on out there and the constant battle we have persuing out sport of choice. Enough is enough!

neither appeal to me either mate. i was once a knuckle dragger, never again.

and willowbank weather is not good for my fair complexion.

I think a $5 photographers/spectators fee would not be an issue, collected at the venue when you arrive and give people a wrist band that shows they have paid..

we all know a stamp on the hand looks much better.

Now that this one was cancelled, then maybe i can enter in the next one (unless i have another crash :D )

Ok I just heard from WSID and they will give us a refund in full although they appear to be hinting that we are not welcome back without saying it outright.

I'll give them a little while to calm down and then see what we can do about a date next year.

Ok I just heard from WSID and they will give us a refund in full although they appear to be hinting that we are not welcome back without saying it outright.

I'll give them a little while to calm down and then see what we can do about a date next year.

yeh if they need the money they'll take it

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The fab work can be as simple as a couple of silicon hoses and clamps to the factory piping. 
    • Just sounds like either way you need to do some fab work to get everything to fit, so why limit yourself at that point? If the GCG high flow option is zero effort in and out swap though I'd probably do that. It's almost certainly lowest risk, lowest cost, etc. The HKS GTIII-RS option that Kapr mentioned is laughably expensive for what it is, they charge the exact same for two turbos on the RB26 so their margins are off the charts on that thing.
    • Intake manifold is not a part of the issue. The turbo bolts to the exhaust manifold. That is easy. But close your eyes and picture the physical situation. That is a T3 flange on the manifold and a T3 flange on the turbo. As long as any new turbo has a T3 flange on the exhaust housing, that exhaust housing will bolt to the exhaust manifold. This places the exhaust housing in the same place as the stock one. But now move your mental attention a little further forward. The location of the compressor housing is set by the length of the turbo's core. The stock turbo had a long core. Let's say that it is..... 100mm long. So that would place the compressor housing 100mm forward of the exhaust housing. But a highflow, might well have a centre core that is shorter. Let's say that it is only 70mm long. Now the compressor housing will be 30mm further back in the engine bay than the stock one. This DOES move the turbo's compressor outlet backwards. It also moves the compressor's inlet backwards. You will very likely have to do some work to both the inlet and outlet piping to make everything connect again. I am not say this to make it out to be a bigger deal than it is. I am just pointing out that "bolt on" is sometimes not quite bolt on. The highflow from GCG that Murray linked above (https://gcg.com.au/turbo-charger-upgrade-skyline-gtst-2iu-xtrgts-s1.html ) uses a core that is the same length as the stock core, and so does not require this extra work. It will look very much like the stock turbo. No-one uses GTR turbos of any flavour (stock, or aftermarket) in a single turbo application on RB20/25. It's not a thing. Yes, people have been putting on GT3076, GTX3076 (and bigger and smaller versions of those) and G30s (of various sizes) onto RB20/25 since forever. But these are not "bolt on". Everything except the 4 bolts to the exhaust manifold change with these. And genuine Garretts are expensive. Non-gen, like Pulsar, etc, are cheaper, variously as good or nearly as good. But still not bolt on. No-one in the right mind would pay for an HKS turbo. Not in this modern day and age. Well, yes, the GCG highflow. You could ask HG what he can do to make the compressor housing sit in the original location. There are surely others doing highflows around the world. And some of the eBay/Temu ones (as reported by Dose) work and don't die. Bit of a lottery though. I would send your turbo to GCG (here in Oz) to be highflowed if you want a trivial no-extra-work option. But seriously, the work required to change inlet and outlet piping is not that hard. That's a boost control problem, not a turbo problem.
    • Thank you all for the replys 🙂 I know that intake would be different but that is one pipe at it is not that hard to get(custom one). I meant mainly bolt to the stock manifold and the turbo elbow. I looked and many sites/forums but they are just "old" with some old HKS turbos from GT-R i guess? What about some Garrets?  Or any other turbo? Is there even a turbo which i can just bolt on? 😄 And yeah i know about that new HKS but that is like 2000k USD without taxes/shipping in here   Iam getting a touch up tune but my "problem" is that on the "not" hot day iam getting peaks around 0,9 bar...and when it was around 15 Celsious i saw peak around 1 bar which is just too much for stock turbo. And of course turbo is old and i like to get some new one for a piece of mind 🙂 
    • I'm working on the assumption that our friend Jasmine here is a Russian (or, possibly Ukrainian) spammer/spambot, based purely on the number of such that I have been having to neuter in the last few weeks. IP address for the OP above was in WA. But that could have been via VPN. Posting at quarter to 4 in the morning is a good sign of being from somewhere in Europe. The last Jasmine that I kicked in the cooch was IP addressed in Ukraine. Even that could have been via VPN, and the bitchbot could have been from Russia, Serbia, China or anywhere. Regardless, was a spambot, so I killed it with fire. The fact that our new friend Jasmine here did not respond in any way to my tart query strongly suggests to me that this OP was just the establishment phase of a user able to be activated for spamming in a week, or 3 or 10.
×
×
  • Create New...