Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

bass junky just went to 250rwkw and his workshop put a 3" (or maybe 2.25" or 2.5") section of steel inside the the rubber intake piping and clamped it to prevent it from being sucked closed. i also had a look at the apexi super intake for r33 and it looks very nice, but its basically the same thing. i dont believe you would gain anything from using it other than avoiding the sucking closed thing and nice shiny new intake pipes

regardless if it sucks fully closed or not it is still a restriction.. me and a few other mates have done comparisions between stock rubber hose and a solid mandrel bent pipe and picked up a car length or 2 (wasnt exactly done on the strip :) (private road.. apprently)) but the car we tested agains ran consisant times due to being auto and before and after was 3 out of 3 for each so you do pick up a little bit from it

Wazz

you answered your own question Robo actually :D hehehe

if the pipe he no sucking shut... then he no problem

You will get no gain if the hose is the same size as the turbo inlet.

Really, how can it be? Only gonna suck what it can fit :(

So no need if your certain its not sucking shut.

Wazz... definately not a restriction. Drag racing on the street isnt a very accurate way of doing a test. Stupid if you ask me.

GTR's run 350kw+ @ the treads stock piping no worries.

i just replaced the rubber piping conecting my pod to the intake(previous owner thought soft rubber was good idea) and felt very restrictive. Had 3" stainless put in there and really noticed the diff. I talked to the guy at the exhaust shop about the rest of the intake and he said that the way its built it should suport round 220-240rwkw..... but the rubber insert conecting them was deffo sucking closed

you answered your own question Robo actually :(  hehehe

if the pipe he no sucking shut... then he no problem

You will get no gain if the hose is the same size as the turbo inlet.

Really, how can it be? Only gonna suck what it can fit  :(

Not necessarily true. I know with experience LS1's they can gain several kw's with bigger maf to TB pipes as the stockies become restrictive. Its generally in the bends that upsets the flow but i have never seen much info with these RB25's

gary explained this last time someone was talking of moving the hotwire rb20 afm into a larger diameter airflow meter shell. the restriction in an N/A car is different to that of a forced induction car. The N?A has restrictions all through the intake and inlet system. The turbo/supercharged model restrictions only lie after the compressor/forced unit. So in theory upgrading the intake to a larger diameter at your given power lower wont "unrestrict anything" if that makes sense. well at least thats what i recall.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah the rule of thumb with an LS is 7psi per 1000rpm. That is decidedly not enough at 6800rpm. I mainly looked for the scenarios where knock started to be picked up and it was later in the session when things were hotter, and oil was thinner, and the pressure was lower than it should be. (i.e very horrible). I am hoping with thicker oil (I was running Penrite ten tenths 10-40, the manual specifies 10-30) that does not leak that it's much improved at that time!!! I am using Project Mu Club Racer CR pads. I'm also using the Project Mu 335C fluid. The symptoms imply that it was fluid that boiled, but no bubbles seemed pretty weird to me when I bled it today. I want to try Castrol SRF as it has a much higher wet temp but, well, I have new Project Mu fluid lol... so I should at least use that. The pedal on track was really noticable. It went from basically normal feeling to instantly near-floor. The car did pull up as before, it was just very much nearly at the floor before the brakes engaged. At that point I pretty much decided the day was very done, it did *kinda* come back during that very slow cooldown lap into the pits. Felt perfectly fine driving home.
    • f**king around with the bro
    • Ludenham   44.2 tops day no issues  
    • Then today, I went to visit a man with an r33 hat Peter and Road and Race sorted the alignment. As it is being set up for general track/hillclimbs etc it has a heap of caster (7o), less camber than I am used to (1o front and 2o rear, as the caster looks after that in turns without the braking downsides), 3mm front toe out and 0 toe rear. Will see how that goes and track tyre wear to see if it does need more camber, but adjsustment is also limited with nismo arms and adjustable bushes at only 1 end. It does have a bent inner tie rod on the driver's side front but as it came up within spec I'll just leave that as is. So, that is getting close to my chapter of this story....could of tidy ups then a shakedown in early October before it finds a new home.
    • So, it went to Unigroup for a run in and tune on Friday, everything went (generally) well. In terms of fixes, the engine was good and there were no leaks. It needed plugs (I hadn't checked them because the coil pack cover was on a new engine and I couldn't imagine they weren't new.....but turns out the temporary plugs to just keep it sealed up were in there.....new plugs gapped to 0.8 and it was fine from there. Also, there was a little preload on the clutch slave which caused some slip. I haven't had the box off so I don't know what the clutch looks like; my guess it is brand new and the pedal had not been adjusted....backed that off a bit and it held fine. Last thing will have Dose crying....the idle especially when cold is a bit difficult between the cams, forward plenum, atmo blow off valve and an 80s air management system. It is fine when hot but a little uneven when cold, will see if I can sort or at least improve that one cold morning. Other than that, tuning went fine. It made 245 but was pulled back to 227 which 2 opportunities to improve in future. 1. The factory CAS is not great and was jumping around at high RPM, so Mark took 2 degrees out up top (that is why it stops making power and lost 20kw). Very safe this way and the extra power is available but will require a more modern ECU and better cam (or even better crank) sensor 2. The 2871 in factory housings is very big for a low mount, and the internal wastegate is too small, so it was creeping from mid range all the way to redline....the duty cycle on the boost controller is turned down a little for safety. That is much harder to fix, it would need a large external gate and that would require a whole bunch of other changes, so it will go as it is for now. It feels nice and healthy and safe, so should be good for about a billion laps like this.
×
×
  • Create New...