Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

You will have an easier time putting a VQ30det in an R32 as the VQ is a tiny block. but the same size capacity.

they are also very wel priced and newer :(

clicky clicky here vor vq info

Edited by CEF11E

I think you'd get more satisfaction spending your hard earned on a RB30 combination - gtr head, intake manifold and twin turbos - it would be a weapon in a r32.

Having done conversions myself they are probably more hassle than they are worth.

Take a look at under the bonnet of a 300ZX and you will quickly change you mind. Their engine bay is wider than an R32 and all of the stuff still doesn't fit without lots of compromises.

If you are going to stick a V engine in there, then a twin tubo Q45 would be at least worth the effort.

:P cheers :)

so a q45 would fit in better? mmm any other engines you would suggest? and i dont want another rb engine really. wanna try something different, i plan on keeping my gtst for a while so i wanna do something completely insane, but then again i dont wanna spend too much lets say under 8 thousand

lol i could throw in a ca18de bet thats never been done in an r32

any way my 2 friends both have r32's gts's and this is my second one my first one was a 93 model with a factory rb25det

and as for my mates ones...

one has an rb25det with big fmic and a nice looking machine soon to have a powerfc go in and also a gt30/40 afaik

my other mate has a rebuilt 20, with the work's o-ringed, forgies, ecu, over 20thou spent on the engine but he just blew his el cheapo chinese t4e and is gonna be putting in a better turbo.. he already had 250kw at wheels any ways i want something thats more special :D

oh also about the available room in engine bay, i thort the extra room the r32 has at the front would be a bonus with the longer engine bay?

Edited by nemz

v6 commo motor(buick)

250X-flow from oldschool falcon

turbocharged boxer engine from a beetle or a kombi (maybe nonturbo)

ca16de from an exa

i could keep going...would certainly make you different and stand out!

yeh.

why not go all out and put the engine out of your ride on in there :D you could then drive it to work and mow the lawn as you leave the drive in the morning :P.... But seriously... much easier if you want more power to get a rb25 or 26 and as they have previously said if that is going to bore you go a rb25/rb30 hybrid very good set up if done right and with the cubes of the 3l you can spool a very decent turbo up much quicker making shit loads of power.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm going to slap an old nismo logo sticker on my spare one and sell it to the land of the free for a thousand bucks
    • lol, probably should have read further!
    • Well - they have arrived.  And they are easy on the eye to put it mildly... These only have three bolts - but for a start there is a key that fits with vacuum like precision..  And as you can see by my ruler, the interface is large..   I listened to a podcast on HP Academy about Dan (KiwiCNC) and I'm more than comfortable he knows what he is doing. R35 Bearing assembly should arrive later today so can mock that up for a look. Can't wait to get these on and get some brake pressure logging too. IMG_3860.MP4
    • I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
    • I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
×
×
  • Create New...