Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I went to Hitman Ignition Tuning today to tune my SAFC-2. I drove in with 147rwkw and drove out with 191.6rwkw. You do the math (i suck).

The service was A1 and he even fixed a few problems i had with the car (timing, spark plug gaps).

Here is the dyno graph:

dyno01.jpg

My car is an AUTO r33 gtst, fmic, 3" turbo back and a pod.

and heres a few pics i took.

dyno03.jpg

DSC00697.jpg

Matt was very willing to explain every step during the tune which is why i felt i had to post this. He's definately a top grade dyno tuner.

Here is his web site if you guys want to contact him.

Hitman Ignition Tuning

w00000t

Edited by SECUR1TY
  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

50rwkws with just the safc

that sounds like bs to me

( not being rude champ)

wat also was done ehaust and pod

50rwkws is f*&%en heaps man u wont get that much from any mod apart from engine and a big turbo

james

with the exhaust, fmic and pod i was running 147kw because it was running mega rich.

its not bs.

maybe you should know what you're talking about before you post bs comments.

(not being rude champ)

I have an auto and have been modding 4 3 years and 50 rwkw IS BS

compleat BS

Not being rude ether

mine r33 auto

3' ful exhaust

fmic with plumb back

pod

ebc

255rwhp @ 10 psi

so your thread interests me and i have been doing this to my auto for a while so when we (auto boys) pull big power i am interested

i had an safc 2 fitted and got 10rwkws

could have been my tuner but the guy is knowen 4 pulling huge hp (and blows turbos all the time)

so that is y i am amazzed, your car must have been running like a pig

also can you flat foot it without poping

i found a few extra kws and a good power band

sorry about insult did not mean anything but you might get more liners a bit ify with that massive gain

james

Security ok champ wat next in the mod angle

i am going the emanage i think but you might have changed my mind

shift kit

fuel system

i recon your turbo is hiflowed is it standard wat psi is it at

and can you put your foot flat to the ground without poping

sorry about all the qs but i realy am interested not enough auto boys

and wat do you want out of it

james

yeah man.. Hitman definately knows his shit.

he uses Haltech engine management but i'd probably go with pfc when i do a manual conversion.

nah my turbo is stock but next mod in line is a t3/4 hybrid (internal gate). maybe get into the 220-240kw range. i'd probably go for the emanage too if i havent gotten the manual conversion by then.

im running 10psi but it spikes up to 12psi mid range for some reason.

basically im looking for a weekday work horse/street racer/weekend worrior(drags)

could have been my tuner but the guy is knowen 4 pulling huge hp (and blows turbos all the time)

WOW! if he is known for blowing turbos he must be really good. i've always thought that being able to damage peoples cars is a sign of a really good tuner... what's his name? my daihatsu needs a quick tune up.

This is an interesting thread

Security: Lets not mislead people into thinking that 50rwkw gains are achievable through the use of an S-AFC, especially on a car like yours that is virtually stock because they arent - end of story.

The ONLY way that you could find that much more power is if your car was running like absolute shite beforehand. The gain is not soley attritbuted to your S-AFC.

It could also be argued that that power figure looks a tad optimistic for an automatic RB25DET with the mods you have listed.

This is an interesting thread

Security: Lets not mislead people into thinking that 50rwkw gains are achievable through the use of an S-AFC, especially on a car like yours that is virtually stock because they arent - end of story.

The ONLY way that you could find that much more power is if your car was running like absolute shite beforehand. The gain is not soley attritbuted to your S-AFC.

It could also be argued that that power figure looks a tad optimistic for an automatic RB25DET with the mods you have listed.

How could you say that Nick , the guy has it all in writing 191.6 kw, ah and he has a big polished fron mount too ....at 102 kmh , that indicates 2nd gear ..... How can you compare power of that car to a manual in 4th gear ... you cant , its just a figure thats all .

Links you are on the money mate 2nd gear with the aid of the torque converter ....

So what are you saying Jerry? Im stating that in order to suddenly realise a gain in power such as this, the car must have been running pretty badly before and Hitman has no doubt corrected various issues to regain lost power, as well as tuning the S-AFC.

Perhaps we can see a dyno reading of how the car was running before the cleanup and tune?

We wouldnt want people to think that an S-AFC with a tune can instantly get you 50rwkw - Thats my point.

My only question is, the "before-tune" figure was under 150rwkw, 147rwkw I think. Would this be a little low considering that the mods were already there?

Maybe something to do with the dyno to generate a lower initial figure? Not 100% sure. When I first dynoed my car in "almost" stock form, it came up with 159rwkw... so it seems a little low. The current setup is getting me 194.6rwkw - maybe his final figure isn't the question, but the intial figure?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...