Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

got the new alternator and dropped off at the mechanics.

its the same unit basically from a series 2 33 although it has a different part # no and its rated at 90a instead of 80a so thats a bonus also.

thanks to all those who helped in assisting me with the hunt, always good to have a helpful group of people to assit, specially matt who organised one for me and basically delievered it to me

thanks heaps guys

love you all

:(

ok good news is car works and runs. bad news is battery warning light is on and still running on 14.9 15.0 15.1 volts (the old was about 15.5volts).

the battery light was never on until now, so im thinking new battery

altho car starts and runs fine with alternator plugged in and it started first sho too after 4 days of not running so not sure what the deal is. hmmm

i fitted a stock series 2 one but it was rated at 90a instead of 80a

ok after some more driving here's some of the wierd stuff ive noticed

boost control is slightly less accurate, it seems to spike lots more

active lsd seems to work a stack better, but still failed once

voltage hovers around 14.9 with lights on, lights off 15.1 (never higher)

voltage reports from hand controller, rsm and turbo timer all seem about the same

battery light stays permentantly on

manifold pressure seems to vary everytime you tap the throttle at idle.

usually it used to always be around -450 or -480mmhg now it seems to go between -300ish and -420ish each time u tap the throttle, like it bounces between those values each time, boost guage and boost controller show the same thing, -380mmhg in digital and the marker on the guage varies each time

car runs fine

idles fine

stereo fine etc

when u start the car with altneratore unplugged battery light is off and runs fine, around 12.8 volts. havent measured output from alternator with mulimeter yet.

will book into an auto elec on monday as we are out of ideas

thanks for everyone's help much appreciated

Paul wouldn’t you expect the voltage reading to be around the 15's while it was charging the battery??.. I mean i think there is always a certain amount of power drawn from the batt to keep the alt working as far as im lead to believe (could be wrong) so maybe it's just the current charging the batt. at least it's allot more consistent now than what your old one was as it was deff reading too high you would imagine..

  • 2 weeks later...

ive had an auto elec look at the alternator that came off my car.

it runs on the bench fine and outputs 14 volts correctly so something else must be wrong with my car. getting it looked at in the morning

Paul wouldn’t you expect the voltage reading to be around the 15's while it was charging the battery??..
No, it should be regulated to around 13.8V, regardless of how full or empty the battery was. It might produce more current, but will always produce the same (regulated) voltage.
I mean i think there is always a certain amount of power drawn from the batt to keep the alt working as far as im lead to believe (could be wrong) so maybe it's just the current charging the batt. at least it's allot more consistent now than what your old one was as it was deff reading too high you would imagine..

Only time the alternator will draw current from the battery is prior to startup. Once the engine is running, then the alternator supplies all the necessary current to run the car and re-charge the battery.

problem solved. there was a missing fuse in the boot (go figure) which forms part of the alternator and regulator circuit. so the alternator was running at full capacity, hence the high voltage. only $88 to diagnose and test my old alternator and diag the missing fuse and replace it

happy happy joy joy

so i now have a spare alternator :)

thanks to all those who offered help and support. you have all been an awesome resource

nah the fuse was physically missing so it was removed by someone or left out when was someone was fixing something or vice versa. very odd i must say. and the fuse is in the boot too which is really awkward to get to

ohhh ok i thought you meant it had fried out or something... very strange... and problem is as nothing is written in english it's not as thought you know whats what to check if something is missing anyway...

picked up car today. running at 13.8 volts and steady. idle seems spot on (used to fluctuate every now and then by itself sometimes). boost control is perfect now and doesn't vary at all. somtimes the evc would have troubles maintaining the right pressure and sometimes do its override cut out, once every few weeks it would do that. a-lsd seems to be much much better but has still failed once. everything else seems hunky dory. glad its all fixed. have a spare (tested) alternator to suit r33 if anyone needs one

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...