Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 100
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

R31...

They are better sorted from factory.

Lower diff ratio that accelerates the car quicker.

Better cooling system setup.

Nicer stiffer chassis.

My sister recentlyish bought a NA VL that had done a genuine 137,000km's. It was spotless.

First thing we did was throw a bran spankin new radiator in it, new genuine nissan thermostat, new clutch fan and gave the whole system a power flush.

~9months later without a warning it started to run on 4cyl's.

No overheating nothing, it sat solid on the 2nd notch. 1 nasty arsed cracked head. The cooling system was perfect, there was ZERO reason for the crack.

Now its sitting in the old mans shed next to her previous VL that also has a cracked head. :S

I prefer the exterior look of the VL, especially a nice dark coloured VL Calais.

Edited by Cubes
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/98189-r31-or-vl/page/2/#findComment-1785469
Share on other sites

When you swaped the radiator/cooling set up

did you blead air out of the system?

There is one little bolt that you losen to let air out after you have added the fluid. oppsite side of the engine to the alternator should be a little yellow sticker

How did you pick the cracked head:

Oil in cooling fluid?

Big mofo visable crack?

Running on only 4 cyclnders i.e. missing when ideling?

Compression test?

Sounds like a good time to swap heads or even engines!

Edited by NAman
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/98189-r31-or-vl/page/2/#findComment-1785717
Share on other sites

Yes Cooling system was bled.

Running on 4cyl's is zero compression in cyls 5 & 6.

There was no oil in the coolant or vice versa.

The head simply cracked, lost compression in cyls 5 & 6 and 100psi in cyl 4, it ran like a pig, sis drove for 10km's to home.

VL's can sometimes run for months with cracked heads and no tell tale signs, depending how bad its cracked.

The water in the oil usually shows up in the PVC valve before anything else all though there was none in there.

I was hoping a headgasket as it went so suddenly, no tell tale signs like usual. It simply cracked and cracked bad.

It wasn't using any water, it was running perfect and not thrashed prior to the head crack.

Ripped the head off.. she's cracked. :P

Its simply holdens lack of R&D in fitting the rb30 in to the VL + the fact the rb30 head does have a weakness. R31's crack heads too... just not if the cooling system is good unlike the VL's.

A mate of mine had the same thing happen to his VL. Perfect working order then crack.

The VL I bought when I was 18 never cracked but I did sell it within 9months to upgrade from that yucky interior.

My RB20DET was cooking and I didn't realise due to just purchasing the car, just smelt hot and spewing out coolant. It ran like that for a complete summer, replaced the temp sender realised it had been driving around on the H!!! That still ran fine for many years after and a solid 100,000km's. :D

Edited by Cubes
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/98189-r31-or-vl/page/2/#findComment-1785743
Share on other sites

If you wanted un un-biased opinion, this isn't really the place to ask.

Wow, what a surprise, everyone says "go for the Skyline"

Now go and start a duplicate of exactly the same thread on http://www.calaisturbo.com.au and see what sort of response you get.

:P

I vote you got for the VL.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/98189-r31-or-vl/page/2/#findComment-1785862
Share on other sites

My only worry is that he will just assume we are all biased because this is a Skyline forum. Its not all bias, the reality is that the Skyline is the better car. I'd be interested to hear what points someone could put forth to say the vl is better, other than they like the look of them better.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/98189-r31-or-vl/page/2/#findComment-1785977
Share on other sites

I can't say I'm a fan of the R31 looks (apart from the coupes).

None the less here's my argument against the VL.

OMG... WHAT CHASSIS RAILS!!! No wonder they have been known to pop windscreens and flex like buggery.

Which would help explain why they weigh damn close to the weight of an R32 that is a smaller car.

Edited by Cubes
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/98189-r31-or-vl/page/2/#findComment-1786020
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, the trouble with that ^^ is: The configuration shown is absolutely a 1-way, not a 1.5-way. There is no way that a 1.5-way can be said to offer LSD action only on acceleration. If Nismo cannot get that right, then it is impossible to believe their documentation. That ^ is not a 1.5 way setup. That is a 1-way.   And so now I have allowed all doubts to flourish and have gone back to look at the MotoIQ video. I originally made the mistake of believing him when he said "this is a 1.5-way" at the ~6:10 mark. Because what he did was take the gear assembly out of the 2-way opening and just rotate it one place to the left to drop it into the 1-way opening. When he dropped it in there, the cam was "backwards" compared to the correct orientation shown in all other photos of that config. The flat shold have been facing the 1° ramp side of the opening, not the 55° ramp side. And I thought, "gee that's cute", but I was concerned at the time, when he put the other ring back on, that the gap between the rings looked like it was wider then in the 2-way config. And then I said a lot of things in my long post on Tuesday that could only make sense if the guy from MotoIQ was correct about what he'd done. BUT... I have now done my homework. I grabbed a frame of the video with the 2-way config, and then grabbed another with the "1.5-way" config, snipped out the cam and opening of that frame and just pasted it direct on top of the 2-way config. I scaled it so that the triangular opening was almost exactly the same height in both. AND.... the gap between the plates is wider with the cam installed in the triangualr opening backwards. That is.... it cannot go together that way. There would be massive force on the plates all the time, if you could even reassemble it.  So, My statement on the matter? The Nismo diff is actually only a 2-way and 1-way. There is no 1.5-way option in it, regardless of what they say. Here's a photo of a real 1.5-way ramp opening from Cusco (along with the 1 way option). And the full set of 1 through 2 way options from their racing diff, which is not same-same as what we'd typically be using, but...the cams work the same. A little blurry, but it comes from this Cusco doc, which is quite helpful. AND.... Cusco do in fact do what I suggested would be sensible, which is to have rings that do 1 and 1.5, and 1.5 and 2. Separately.  
    • Welcome Adam. Car looks great!
    • "With a 1.5-WAY, the LSD is effective only during acceleration."
    • Well it wasn't as easy as I thought.... and it also wasn't in my original manual which I did end up finding. They discuss the process in the Nismo catalogue though and it requires slight machining. Page 145.  NISMO PARTS CATALOGUE 2020
    • I'm an idiot, my intercooler is rated for 1000hp. I had clicked on the wrong product. Knowing the delta P would be nice, but I'm doubtful I'll do it. Now as for an EMAP, that would be great and I'll get around to it eventually but from my findings in my last post, I'm considering a turbo swap now. 
×
×
  • Create New...