Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

heres a dyno graph all readings are on the same dyno (different days though) and they are on the same graph to read easier.

they are all rb26 engines with rebuild bottom ends (except the highflowed turbos engine which is dead stock). they are all stock capacity and the t04z engine and gt42 engine have different cams to stock.

there is a...

GT42 with 1.0 housing

garret T04Z 0.84 housing

r34 ball bearing low mounts

r32 highflowed stock turbos

here ya go...

108_0841.jpg

cheers

Brad

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/99705-turbo-comparisions-on-rb26s/
Share on other sites

If all of the turbo's were tuned to max power then psi is irrelevant, one may make less power with more boost.

Diff ratio's here are irrelevant as its all done to RPM..

The poor bloke with the GT42.. Much too big for the 2.6ltr.

Excellent comparision.

Edited by Cubes

Fair enough, I missed the point that they were all rebuilt and tuned to max power.

Only saying that - some engines/boost may not be tuned as high due to different compression ratios, based on HG thickness or engine comp ...

But this is probably the best comparo possible. But i would still like to know boost pressures run across the board, if at all possible

the gt42 was lowish boost, i think around 20psi from memory, the t04z is on 18psi, and the r34 bb turbos i dont know, and the highflows are 18psi.

the t04z graph is simon (r32 GTS) on this forum on low boost (made 620hp i think recently on 23psi)

or by this you can see that twin hks t04z with 0.63 a/r rear housings are almost as responsive as a gt42 with 1.06 a/r.

added a garret t04z with.8 a/r as well for comparison

32gtr_581.jpg

IMG_9652_edited.jpg

32gtr_627.jpg

gt42 is running only 20psi

t04z are about 24psi

twin t04z's are about 28psi

Edited by Cerbera

Funny how some shops will claim more power from one ECU to another.

All ECUs will make the same power if the timing,fuel,turbos,intake etc are the same.

Note that its also the only graph not in full shootout mode.

The history of the 581hp car makes it a poor example as its had a few GCG turbos and GT42 cartrage in GCG housings and many engine builds plus 3 different ECUs and a best of low 12s at the drags, tho the Wolf that it was lending has done the fastest GTR pass in WA to date at 10.7.

Still looks like the TO4Z is the best street strip turbo at the moment.

LOL fastest GTR pass in WA @ 11.7

are you on crack

ND4SPD 10.7

Simons GTR 10.8

Got Boost (gts4 with rb26) 10.9

not even close to the lofty 11.7 you speak of

f**k even bobbos dead stock GTR did 11.8 .. stock turbos internals cams, mines rom, boost zorst and it hoses many a aftermarket ecu equipped GTR time..

Yeah the 581 rwhp is such a crap example.. had massive money thrown at it, blown up on a dyno (oh the memories) , its not like the dog box, autronics etc etc meant that the owner built the car to the best of standards...

/rant over

Brad well done for the post

Edited by [teejay]
Funny how some shops will claim more power from one ECU to another.

All ECUs will make the same power if the timing,fuel,turbos,intake etc are the same.

Note that its also the only graph not in full shootout mode.

The history of the 581hp car makes it a poor example as its had a few GCG turbos and GT42 cartrage in GCG housings and many engine builds plus 3 different ECUs and a best of low 12s at the drags, tho the Wolf that it was lending has done the fastest GTR pass in WA to date at 11.7.

Still looks like the TO4Z is the best street strip turbo at the moment.

also i do believe 2 GTR's and one GTS-4 have done 10's in WA

Edited by Cerbera
tho the Wolf that it was lending has done the fastest GTR pass in WA to date at 10.7.

Actually, the fastest pass by a gt-r in wa is Kier wilson, 9.something in his drag gt-r, and his street car backed it up with a low 10, and they both run motec..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi Apex and welcome! 
    • Probably too late to reply to this, but worth a try. It's not calliper flex, the calliper as a whole is moving so it has to be calliper mounting bracket flex.  Calliper mounting brackets are designed to stop the calliper rotating, they don't need to be designed heavy duty to stop the calliper moving in and out.  Whatever it is is not the major cause of poor pedal feel, the outer pistons are moving towards the disc rotor the same amount as the inner pistons are moving away from the disc rotor.  Hence no change in fluid usage, what extra fluid is needed to move the outer pistons is recovered from the inner pistons. For a calliper to move as a whole by far the most common reason is the rotor is not perfectly centred in the calliper.  The first thing I check is that hub face is perfectly clean, bare metal, where the rotor hats contacts it.  Then I check the that rotor is firmly held in place by at least 3 wheel nuts (or equivalent). If all of the above are confirmed to be in perfect alignment then I would check the piston sizes and ensure that the 3 inner pistons and 3 outer pistons have matching diameters (eg; 28/32/36mm).  I have seen a no name 4 spot calliper that had 1 of the 4 pistons a different diameter. Maybe I missed it, are both the callipers exhibiting the same problem? I would remove the transfer pipe and inspect it to make sure that there are no restrictions. Maybe you already have but if not I would return them with the video and have them confirm all of the above.   Hope that helps Cheers Gary    
    • If you have the original log book and it didn't have a chassis number quoted, then no money required.  I have "rechassied" a number of race cars, no problem as long as you have the original log book.   Cheers Gary
    • Well the good news is that it won't run any worse with an atmo bov than it does with no bov, I've owned a few Nissans over the years (r32, s15 and now r33), the stalling issue caused by a bov or no bov while still having an afm is easy enough to live with, most people get used to driving them and just feathering the throttle when you come to a stop to avoid it stalling. Changing to a proper ecu with a map sensor is ideal but in the short term I'd just slap in the bov if you really want the whoosh sound. I looked into the pass through type maf like the R35 one above but decided against it as the amount of oil and crap flowing through the hot side would mean you'd have to clean it often to keep it working.
×
×
  • Create New...