Can someone please explain the following (for Melbourne):
November 2009 was the hottest November on record (ave daily temp 27.1). Prior to this, the hottest November was in 1862 (25.5). What happened in 1862 that made it so hot? It couldn't possibly have been anthropogenic activity. And if it wasn't anthropogenic activity, why should we believe that the most recent hot November is the result of anthropogenic activity?
Until 2009, the hottest day recorded in Melbourne was way back in 1939. Why did it take so long?
This last May was the COLDEST May in 41 years. (thank goodness for global warming, I say!)
If climate change were genuine, then many of the months would have had their hottest days or highest averages in recent years. They haven't.
The earth has been a lot warmer in the past; and it has been a lot colder. Its all part of a cycle of change.
BTW, I'm not a non-believer, I'm a sceptic. I became more sceptical when the soothsayers stopped referring to "global warming" and started referring to "climate change".