Jump to content
SAU Community

R31Nismoid

Members
  • Posts

    42,485
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13
  • Feedback

    100%

Everything posted by R31Nismoid

  1. Ye i aint talking Auto's, just manual
  2. I don't have enough money is what happened But there is no way its 25% dude. just d 600hp, 440kw, loss would be 111kw. 330rwkw is not equal to 600hp
  3. Its the same as the old version to upload photo's, and it works fine. It's the user, not the forum
  4. Kevin, this has again, been answered in previous pages. 2 or 3 back
  5. I google'd it twice just to be sure i was right
  6. This person is from Paramaribo, Suriname... Intereting...
  7. nonononono... the MOTOR is capable, but the driver/car setup/cooling etc - is not. Anyone can make power on a dyno mate. Its getting it to last 3-5 years that is the real challenge
  8. thinking... if only 330rwkw is the aim. that's right on the new GTX3076 land! get rid of the GT35 altogether and get some response back for a near similar peak. man we need some real results lol.
  9. i think you realise a GT35 is 700hp of turbo, as in 370-380rwkw... time for more research my friend
  10. • Standard plenum but been converted to forward facing - issue, likely to have flow problems • Ford XF 80mm throttle body – not required, stock is fine upto 400rwkw. Going larger just creats throttle control issues • 3 inch turbo back high flow exhaust system - issue - you need at least 3.5" As for the rest, 290rwkw @ 20psi from a GT35, you have a serious problem. A GT35 will make 360-370rwkw comfortably on 20-24psi usually. Exhaust is probably a cause. You make no mention of what exhaust manifold either, or external gate? It looks like a tiny rear housing from the small pics which would suggest a .63 rear, which is a bad choice for such a turbo. So change that, along with exhaust. Decent manifold and gate and you'll be set. That'll come at a cost of around 5k though, so its not exactly a cheap return
  11. If you believed you have been scammed - PM me with the FULL details. -Emails -PM's -Any other correspondence -Full dates, times etc. -Links to threads, pictures, items If you don't send me enough information, i will not be able to help. And at the end of the day, it's a Police matter so you must contact them also. I cannot magically make your silly EFT, return to your account. Starting a thread like this will not help you out.
  12. Oh was his E85? I thought it was PULP.. My bad if thats the case!
  13. And r33_racer or whatever also had around that figure too? Maybe it was 380? (struggling to recall)
  14. Guilt-toy did 370rwkw or so on 20psi with a GT35 3ltr admittadly but it was a stock 25 head.
  15. Yep Its just a theory, but it did make the power on fuel - which does tend to mask exhaust issues to a point - so it can at least flow that much. I really wish i had a chance to see it to the end, but ye, 25 out, 26 in!
  16. .82 45mm gate GTSR manifold. 270 @ 17 PULP 370 @ 24 SUNOCO 104 it'd be well into the 300 on PULP. my bad 3" exhaust caused issues. and then i was EPAd, so took out the setup before getting a 3.5-4" done.
  17. Can't say i had an issue with my 3040 (600hp) item. The GTX3076 would be what, 600-650 now?
  18. Because some of the craziest, dedicated circuit cars, are around the 650-700hp region. Unless you intend to go all out, balls to the wall style modifications... I just feel it's over the top. These guys are all running strokers on what are probably 30-40k motors and so on, so they are able to sit in that region without as much issue.
  19. Date will be confirmed either COB today, or Monday
  20. Ye agreed. Not much difference, but you can see a bit of a dip as a result either way after 6500 Would be interesting comparo indeed!
  21. There is a lot of info in the EPA / Roadworthy thread in the Vic Section too mate. I've tried to answer as much as I can over the years as I've had EPA's, Canaries, trips to court (to challenge the defects)... You name it (and im 28 now). Also had at length chats to the EPA officers on many occasions about various issues as well as a few VASS Engineers. It's interesting the things they will tell you if you aren't the typical dumb ass-hat that comes in there and wants to argue with them or tell you the sorry story of how the officer EPA'd you lol
  22. Nah the green is boost, just wavers a bit in the mid, comes back up and then drops a bit lower? (164kpa-150/151). NFI what that is in boost. You people are weird over there @ 3076, jebus...
  23. Has a rather odd power curve Something up with the boost control it seems? Starts to comes up nice at 4500rpm, then different till 6500 and then it starts to really fall off So around 350 on normal 98, not bad! 130rwkw @ 4000rpm on Mix is a bit rough though, but then it was only $800 and a bushie, so pretty reasonable all things considered.
  24. If it is a 700hp turbo, you need closer to 22-24psi to really get it hoofing along. But i still think going smaller would be better, there is so much more "meat" on the graph to gain. Sounds honestly like you don't have the setup for 550rwhp/400rwkw anyway, so a peg back in power and a gain in response would be a win-win. I also think you have exhaust size issues. Drop it from before the CAT, although it's 3", it might show some gains and then thats where you can point the finger. Could also be valve float but doesn't seem so at this stage.
×
×
  • Create New...