Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 130
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yeah before i set my boost to 12 psi,i drove around with a fmic but with stock boost.I noticed there was a different in flow and my car drives smoother.(maybe its what type of cooler u choose,tube&fin or bar&plate).Not advisable to run more than 12 psi with the stock turbo.I think 12 psi is the optimum boost level for it anyway(correct me if im wrong).Hi flowing isnt a bad idea i guess?

13.6

-outlaw racing-

havent experienced spiking with turbosmart type 1

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10034-fmic-stock-turbo/#findComment-156406
Share on other sites

Yeah I had this set-up but I also installed a boost controller. I found that with the standard boost setting there was more lag down low but better top end due to the larger FMIC.

Anyway, I set my boost to ard 11-12psi which was ok. I was told that the standard turbo can go to around 14psi but at that setting I had trouble with air/fuel ratio.

I think its better for your turbo if you have a custom dump and front pipe and better for your engine to have a safc or ems if you decide to consistently run higher boost (14psi) with standard turbo.

Just my two cents....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10034-fmic-stock-turbo/#findComment-156520
Share on other sites

Everyone has some lag, but whether you experience more due to a FMIC I don't know for sure, my car seems more responsive with it, and it definately produces more power. If lag has increased then it is not a significant amount, but I have quite a different setup than most, so I don't know how this has affected my results.

See'ya:burnout:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10034-fmic-stock-turbo/#findComment-157332
Share on other sites

The No.1 problem with cooler selection is incorrect size. It amazes me a little that people consistantly get fmic that are sometimes over 200hp more flow than required. And I am amazed even more by mechanics and tuners who make this recomendation to customers when they would never do such a thing with camshaft selection,head porting or carby size.

Just pick your HP and 'then' pick the matching parts.

I don't think I've seen a GTST with a stock turbo yet with a properly sized fmic.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10034-fmic-stock-turbo/#findComment-157556
Share on other sites

rev,

Your right that most people have overly large intercoolers, but I for one don't wish to swap intercoolers everytime I do something to my engine. I have all my airflow side setup in anticipation of a larger turbo, therefore I currently have a larger FMIC than I currently need.

See'ya:burnout:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10034-fmic-stock-turbo/#findComment-157745
Share on other sites

GTS-Vspec,

Not a problem. I assume you are already planing to get a turbo of the correct size for the intercooler.

This thread however is about the stock turbo. And many people are blissfully un-aware of the waste of money a larger intercooler can be if done the wrong way.

Look forward to seeing you rip it up with the GT30 on!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10034-fmic-stock-turbo/#findComment-157778
Share on other sites

I think anyone that fits a FMIC is planning on a turbo upgrade of some sort, whether it be hiflo'ing or a larger turbo, as once you've done the fmic there isnt much else that can increase the power of the car but increasing the turbo (after ecu, fuel system etc). But at the same time once you start to play with the boost you really need to get a better intercooler to control temperatures. No point in fitting something slightly bigger than the stock one just to suit the stock turbo.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10034-fmic-stock-turbo/#findComment-158232
Share on other sites

Rob upping the ic size and front location, is a good idea even on a stock turbo if you want that exra power or if your car is going to see sustained boost (like on the track).

The problem is that if I was to ask " how much HP does you intercooler flow?" Most wouldn't be able to tell me.

Then upgrading to a larger turbo, being good and all, will also mean the intercooler was not selected with a specific turbo in mind.

This kind of 'bolt on' mentality is the reason 80% of all the modifed street cars (including V8s and everything else) perform fairly ordinarily considering the amounts of money thrown at them.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10034-fmic-stock-turbo/#findComment-158551
Share on other sites

What results do you think I will attain with my trust unit then? Will I get slower 1/4 mile times? I can see how moving the side mounted intercooler to the front would assist with air-flow, but at the same time the stock cooler can only flow so much cooler air to the turbo and because of its small size can only cool the air slightly. A friend of mine with a 180sx mounted a GTR cooler into the front nose of his car and even with the limited flow (180sx's nose must suck for a front mount as hardly any of it is exposed at the front due to it dipping off) he noticed the car running considerably better and actually found boost to come on quicker. Before the fmic he was running 14.1's with it he ran a 13.6 I think, no other adjustments. Anyway with the fmic and lower tyre pressures I hope to be biting at rev's heels :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10034-fmic-stock-turbo/#findComment-158555
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...