Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

All,

I'm in the process of trying to source larger diam disks to put on my R32 GTR.

I want to keep the standard calipers, so i'm looking at the 324 R34 GTR ones.

I need brackets or " dogbones" for these and wondered if anyone knew where to get em ( have tried roguepi but he seems pretty hard to get the hold of )

Anyone else who has gone other directions, pls feel free to suggest.....

There are a few other brands of disks ( bmw, audi ) that i could use, but then i'd have to get dogbones made, and thats more $$.

Input appreciated

Thanx

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/101801-r32-gtr-disk-upgrade-ideas/
Share on other sites

Going to bigger discs is OK as long as you need to do so for cooling purposes etc as it's not going to stop you faster or feel better. Going to a disc large enough to make the hassle worthwhile will probably present pad overlap issues.

If you want better feel etc look at the calipers and pads.

Standard brakes in good shape with good pads can lock up R compound tyres - do you need more?

Brembos are a good easy conversion. Try searching for posts by Roy on this, it's been covered a lot before and he's done a fair bit of research etc.

thanks for the input GTR32.

I want to go bigger for heat dissapation as i have cracked my cross drilled disks. I'm running Ferodo DS2500 pads, which pull the thing up very well on the track, but as with most GTR's they brakes get very hot.

The pads cope very well with the heat, but the disks dont. I guess i could go better quality disks as the ones i cracked are whatever was on the car when i got it.

I'm going to put ducts to them too, but thought i would consider a bigger disk if i could while i was at it.

33/34 gtr ones work really well. the fronts still get red hot but. the rears work suprisingly well.

im running 34/33 rears and f40 343mm floating brakes on the front.

rears only dull red fronts bright orange!!!

i had 33 gtr ones on the front but they dont cop the heat and take ages too cool.

stock 32gtr rears are way too small and get way to hot and crack inhalf!!!

it happend.

gotta love the old road. :lol: :lol:

so in reality it depends how hard ur gonna push ur car. bigger is better.

a355mm front with big reds will be the best i recon. can fit 17s over them too.

For the rears: R32 GTR, R33 GTST & R34 GTT discs are all the same diameter, and thickness.

The only difference is the R33 GTR rears which are only 3mm bigger diam, and 4mm thicker. I guess its the added 4mm thickness that makes a big difference.

For the rears whitesky I have a feeling you could get by with just swapping the discs for the thicker ones?

thanks to everyone for all your input and help, its much appreciated.

Roy iam runiing 17 inch wheels.

I dont want to spend brembo conversion money, just looking for a bigger disk that i can dogbone to fit.

Fully floating or brembo would be great but i dont want to spend 1500 upwards.

I guess i was hoping to get some disks and make them fit for about 600 bucks.

Cooling ducts from the front lip are the plan, to help ease the pain.

Any more suggestions welcomed......

33/34 gtr ones work really well. the fronts still get red hot but. the rears work suprisingly well.

im running 34/33 rears and f40 343mm floating brakes on the front.

rears only dull red fronts bright orange!!!

i had 33 gtr ones on the front but they dont cop the heat and take ages too cool.

stock 32gtr rears are way too small and get way to hot and crack inhalf!!!

it happend.

gotta love the old road. :lol:  :lol:

so in reality it depends how hard ur gonna push ur car. bigger is better.

a355mm front with big reds will be the best i recon. can fit 17s over them too.

What do you think of the F40 caliper? Looking at the prices they go for 2nd hand, dido the Porsche calipers i would be inclined to go the AP 4 pots with a 330x32mm rotor.

That said that still an expensive upgrade...ducting is worth a go...when i get my thing back to Sandown im going to try and run a channel of the data logger to the front right rotor and see what temps it sees, and what/if any effect a couple of duct variations has.

Short of spending big money, id have a go at some ducting, and some DBA 5000 rotors. Seems to be a good budget upgrade. Sadly with brakes there is no real cheap fix, especially with GTRs because of their weight and power :D

I also know of a friend that runs out of brakes when he drove his WRX at Eastern Creek (normally not very hard on brakes). But when his cousin drove the car he had no problem with the brakes...and went quicker, so learning how to brake properly is probably the cheapest upgrade...something i dont know how to do as i am always flat spotting semi slicks :P

The best two pieces of advise on here;

Standard brakes in good shape with good pads can lock up R compound tyres - do you need more?
I also know of a friend that runs out of brakes when he drove his WRX at Eastern Creek (normally not very hard on brakes).  But when his cousin drove the car he had no problem with the brakes...and went quicker, so learning how to brake properly is probably the cheapest upgrade

I would add, stay away from drilled disks, slotted are the go.

Then spend the saved money on handling upgrades, some circuit specific driver training and the lap times will be faster.

If you still want larger rotors, then UAS do an upgrade for around $800 complete (DBA 4000 series rotors, bolts and adaptors);

skystg1brakekit-s.jpg

The DBA5000 series (floating disk) upgrade to the above is around $500 extra.

:P cheers :)

Edited by Sydneykid
Boys,

I have just fitted these under 18 inch rims...

Front 355 * 32MM 6 POT

Rear 343 * 28MM 2 POT

front_small.jpg

rear_small.jpg

Don't muck around, get the best you can afford.

See you at Calder on Feb 11.

Regards

Andrew

May i ask how much the 6 pot front upgrade was???

And Ronin, its tough enough winning an ebay auction against just the poms, without having ot outbid Aussies as well:rolleyes:

And SK, i would have tended to agree with the std brake statement...but one thing i have noticed is that places like Calder and Sandown are much harder on brakes then some other tracks. And turn 1 at Sandown, its nice to know you have plenty of pedal considering how many cars roll there :)

And these days there are plenty of 1650kg GTRs with std rotors, calipers etc pushing out 250-280rwkws...the R32s do seem to struggle more then R33s etc.

At sprints they may only have to hang in there for 3 laps so worst case you just need to drive with brake conservation in the back of your mind...until i can afford those 8 pot Brembos on 360mm rotors that is :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...