Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I just did a net search and this movie sounds like its going to be crap. Its got bow wow in it for god sakes. There not even going to bring back vin diesel as planned. "The fast and the furious - tokyo drift' is the name they have called it. I was so lookking forward to this movie but I think they killed the franchise with this one. check it out

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0463985/

not happy jan!!!!!!!!!!!!

AWD cars are supposably not alloweing japanes drift tournaments because they are to easy to drift in.

when i heard that it supprised me to.

i can understand that.. one of there ratings is on speed.. awd's can drift alot quicker than rwd cars so that's why i'd imagine they'd be banned in tournaments.. either that or just give them a awd catagory

Great another movie that will spawn a generation of kids who think they can drift in their parents cars, which will then result in media bashing car enthusiasts

whats new about that?

this movie is going to be horriblle..... its bad enough with all the nissansilvia wankjobs

No, audis rule. Go do some decent research.

Whatever happens tho, 90% of us will go see the movie just to see how much of a laugh it is, or how stupid it is or whatever. The people that make the movie dont care, as long as they make a motza on it.

Didnt you know that Japanese car manufacturers lack creativity so they must copy European rivals?

Honda has been copying BMWs for ages now they moved onto Audi...

Nissan 350Z does look like Porsche and so on.

Probably the only real car that Nissan designed to look unique is the R32-34 skylines...

The accord Euro is designed in Europe if I'm not wrong.....

if you ask me I find Japanese has the most original car design. if you look at the audi, Ferrari, Lambo they all look the same

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...