Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 717
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

yeah he got 265rwkw with nos, between 4000 and 4200 rpm he went from 120rwkw to 235 rwkw!!!! Near vert curve. Crazy.

Nah i didn't talk to ya, but saw u wandering round a few times. I wanna buy the top secret gtr :D

Then put a small projectile in the exhaust and watch it fly away into someone's windscreen as your taking off.

:/

1994 R32 GTR

76,000km

HKS 2530's @ 20psi

260 Poncams

= 301rwkw

I have a feeling the dyno was abit conservative but anyhow it was a great day (even though a touch hot).

post-1296-1142074549.jpg

Edited by benm

Just had a look at Stan's dyno graph - from the SATANIC. Very surprising to see that UAS backed off the run before it even ended... meant that peak power wasn't even reached??? The dyno graph just went vertically downwards at the end, power curve hadn't even started to dip yet.

Anyone else see this on their graphs or was it just Stan's?

Firstly a big thank you to Adam for putting this together. :/

Also to John and the staff at UAS for running the show.

Very happy with my boat, managed 261.3 rwkw @ 16psi.

Originally had boost set at 19psi,

but I wanted to know how she would go at a friendlier level. :D

Plenty of tough liners there today, some real good numbers.

So who's going to WSID?

1994 R32 GTR

76,000km

HKS 2530's @ 20psi

272 Poncams

= 301rwkw

I have a feeling the dyno was abit conservative but anyhow it was a great day (even though a touch hot).

Mate I had bit of a sticky beak at your GTR when it was waiting in line - all your odometer numbers line up nicely leading me to believe it is a genuine 76,000km? Nice :D

I'm *know* my odometer is a genuine 74,000km :D on the plus side I know for sure the boost restrictor is still in. :/ Comforting.

Just had a look at Stan's dyno graph - from the SATANIC. Very surprising to see that UAS backed off the run before it even ended... meant that peak power wasn't even reached??? The dyno graph just went vertically downwards at the end, power curve hadn't even started to dip yet.

Anyone else see this on their graphs or was it just Stan's?

If I recall his A/F ratios were running a little to lean to push it too much farther.. was a good run.. could have held on a little longer, got a video of it here.. I think the main issue with power was his boost dropping off 1psi..

anyways.. good day.. stuck round for a bit.. than left.. stupid whining gearbox.. shits me to tears now sounds like i'm running a dogbox or something..

Edited by Links
Firstly a big thank you to Adam for putting this together. :/

Also to John and the staff at UAS for running the show.

Very happy with my boat, managed 261.3 rwkw @ 16psi.

Originally had boost set at 19psi,

but I wanted to know how she would go at a friendlier level. :D

Plenty of tough liners there today, some real good numbers.

So who's going to WSID?

So who won STD turbo GTS-t......

also...who won overall and the reg.?

1994 R32 GTR

76,000km

HKS 2530's @ 20psi

272 Poncams

= 301rwkw

I have a feeling the dyno was abit conservative but anyhow it was a great day (even though a touch hot).

your poncams are 260...i fitted em.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...