Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

So now I've signed up to get an import thru Geoff@Prestige.....

Your advice/comments/experiences on which is better would be greatly appreciated ! Stock ?? or Modified ??

Here's my 2c:

Stock-

Pros: Not thrashed(maybe), You get what you see

Cons: Expensive to mod, once here

Modified-

Cons: Could have been thrashed, lots of worn out bits

Pros: Let someone else pay for mods - get good value for $$$

Thanks all , you've been heaps of help so far !!!

BF

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1033-importwhats-betterstock-or-modified/
Share on other sites

most of them are thrashed whether they have mods or not.

i got my car with heaps of mods and saved a stack. i've seen ppl buy stock cars for the same price that i got mine and they are even older cars in some instances.

put it this way, after buying my car i wouldn't have $15k to spend on mods so i'm gratefull the previous owner spent that amount. who cares if they are slightly used, you save more than enough to pay for your insurance for a few years.:P

Well it depends on your situation, if you've got plenty of many, then buying stock and modding wouldn't be a bad idea. But if you're working on a some what limited budget, i would probably looking the best car I could with the most mods, if the car's been kept tidy, chances are it's been looked after somewhat by an enthusiast. If the car looks trashed, it's probably been thrashed.

But if you're buying a modded car, try and budget that little bit extra for the un known. And the other thing with buying a stock car, just because it looks stock, you could also run the risk of it not being looked after/serviced regularly.

That's just my opinion, but I think going through Geoff you'll get a pretty good idea of what the car is and has and needs.

I think everyone that goes for an import is trying to save $$ and at the same time get value .

What it comes down to (as birty says) is : How thrashed do these cars get ?? Is a mod'd one more thrashed than a stock one ? How can you tell ??

Is 'thrashed' the same here as it is in Japan ?? How do the japanese get to thrash their cars ?? Streets ?? Drags ?? Other ??

Does thrashed mean 'abosolutely buggered' or does it mean that it has had some hard traffic light hero yards ??

Lets look at WORST case scenario... highly mod'd car (that is obviously not a drifter or race car ie: no roll cage, normal suspension etc) - Can the Japenese get away with some of the stuff we can get away with (eg: no speed limit in NT, bad roads) ?? Can they do it constantly ??

Or do they just put heaps of mods on their cars to show off - and maybe do the odd burrrn here and there ?

I spose the answer is : "it depends"...

It's an educated guestimate lottery !!

BF

Originally posted by ONARUN

most of them are thrashed whether they have mods or not.

i got my car with heaps of mods and saved a stack. i've seen ppl buy stock cars for the same price that i got mine and they are even older cars in some instances.

put it this way, after buying my car i wouldn't have $15k to spend on mods so i'm gratefull the previous owner spent that amount. who cares if they are slightly used, you save more than enough to pay for your insurance for a few years.:P

Yeah but your mods were done locally dude!

Brendon, in japan most cars are either bog stock, worked and used as drifters/racers, or worked to "look like" drifters or racers. I doubt a stock car is going to be thrashed, normally geoff can tell you about the condition of the inside ie worn rubbers on pedals, worn carpet and seats, and wear on gearknob and wheel which are a BIG indication of abuse.

Stock is best if you can afford to mod later, of course buying modded can have drawbacks like the cost (additional) to remove performance parts and refit when compliancing, however several people have bought their cars in modded and found extra goodies such as different turbos they didnt know about or other hot bits which is a nice surprise.

As you mentioned, geoff does a good job in supplying ALL available info about the cars history/condition to the prospective buyer so you are on a winner with him.

my 2 sence plus GST long time :(

Really depends on what you want.

I chose stock because I wanted to understand what each modification did, and and what works and what doesn't.

But if you just want a gutsy car, get a modded one and save the money.

And like everyone is saying, all these cars have been thrashed. Any performance car has, after all, what else are they good for???

I chose to get a stock car for the exact reason you said Brendan, i was *hoping* that would mean it hadn't been thrashed.

The only thing changed in the car was the stereo. Everything else was original...the interior was immaculate (except for a slightly worn steering wheel), it had the original Skylines mats, and even the flare....and the jack & spare wheel look like they've never been touched. So i guess I got what i asked for.

But, as GTR-80Y said, next time I would be looking for one with minor mods. Just a few things like an exhaust, maybe a body kit etc, stuff that adds up in $$$$ here, but doesn't really cost more when buying at auction over there.

One with heaps of mods, i would stay clear of, but that's just me :P

Either way the car has may have been thrashed. If the car is still running fine and checks OK with mods its probably a bargain. However, I've seen cars that were "not modded" even though there were tell tale signs like mounting marks on the dash and extra holes in the engine bay.

I agree with all the people that would get a modded car. Not only do you save on all the goodies but you get the techinical expertise that has gone into it.

A car built here and a car built in japan will never be the same. Generally the car that was built in japan will have complementary gear and will suit a purpose.

Geoff seems to have good suppliers who checks the cars out well so I would go with a modded one also.

It's not uncommon for a modified car to have ALL the performance parts removed (quite often some without a trace!) So how then do you know if your stock example really is/was stock & wasn't trashed?!?!

I've seen the above happen to cars once they've arrived in Australia. Yards do it sometimes as it easier to move a "stock" import, rather than try to sell as is. Potential buyers are more wary of a modified car, as per shell's last paragraph in her post above.

My 2.2c

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...