Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

At the end of the day this is the bottom line-F1 needs Ferrari more than Ferrari needs F1-they make 4400 cars a year and every car is sold with a 3 year waiting list. Id be more than happy to keep all you boys happy and have Ferrair pull out of F1-but a massive amount of peeps would not watch, and Bernie knows this and thats why the Scuderia get away with things like extra testing and thats why they have so much pull with Bernie, cause he knows how much ferrari means to F1 and his wallet.

And until a Macca driver or Renault driver wins 5 champoinships in one of these cars no one has a leg to stand on in any argument :mellow:

  • Replies 1.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

At the end of the day this is the bottom line-F1 needs Ferrari more than Ferrari needs F1-they make 4400 cars a year and every car is sold with a 3 year waiting list. Id be more than happy to keep all you boys happy and have Ferrair pull out of F1-but a massive amount of peeps would not watch, and Bernie knows this and thats why the Scuderia get away with things like extra testing and thats why they have so much pull with Bernie, cause he knows how much ferrari means to F1 and his wallet.

And until a Macca driver or Renault driver wins 5 champoinships in one of these cars no one has a leg to stand on in any argument :(

didnt you watch F1 in the 80's?? They didnt call it the "Mclaren steamroller" for nothing...

i dont want Ferrari out of F1, everyone needs a villan. I would just would like to see them paticipate in the sport in a more fair and honest manner. Their blatent disregard of agreements really doesnt go down well with the rest of the paddock... or F1 fans

The question has always stood: If Schumacher is so good then why does he need a #2 driver entirely subservient to his needs. Or run into everyone else when the pressure is on (Like last week, for instance).

Yep, he can drive, but he has a glass jaw (& a large one at that).

I think that drum gets beaten a little too loud. More often then not MS starts the season off on the right foot, and come judgement time its only reasonable that the team support his march for the WDC. If you can point out a season where his team mate was ahead of him on points by the 5th round...i would be very interested.

Unlike McLaren, i dont recall Ferrari pulling out the team orders book when the team mates have been within afew points of each other. The MS No1 thing is a function of him being better then about everyone in the field

I think that drum gets beaten a little too loud. More often then not MS starts the season off on the right foot, and come judgement time its only reasonable that the team support his march for the WDC. If you can point out a season where his team mate was ahead of him on points by the 5th round...i would be very interested.

Unlike McLaren, i dont recall Ferrari pulling out the team orders book when the team mates have been within afew points of each other. The MS No1 thing is a function of him being better then about everyone in the field

I think perhaps you need to check with Reubens Barricello.

Cheers

I think perhaps you need to check with Reubens Barricello.

Cheers

I dont recall Rubens beign asked to pull over for MS in the 1st GP of the year like DC had to for Mika etc. I dont remember Rubens or Eddie starting a season strongly where in the first 2-3 GPs qualified ahead of MS and gave themselves a chance on the points stance.

I think MS is just that good. Even Massa this year, he has been asked to sit back a few times...but even if he was allowd to race him i doubt he would have his measure

Unlike McLaren, i dont recall Ferrari pulling out the team orders book when the team mates have been within afew points of each other. The MS No1 thing is a function of him being better then about everyone in the field

When did McLaren ever do that? I can recall Mika Hakkinnen going off his brain at Ron Dennis after a race at Spa because he had to fight with Coulthard for a place. The one time it all fell apart was in Melbourne, but that was all based around a messed up radio call which made Mika drive through the pit lane to no good purpose. They fixed it by making the two swap places on the track. It had absolutely nothing to do with championship points or anything else. Just righting a wrong.

Remember the FIA changed the rules because of the way Ferrari made a dogs breakfast of it a few years back. Was it at Indy, or another race, I can't remember.

At the end of the day this is the bottom line-F1 needs Ferrari more than Ferrari needs F1-they make 4400 cars a year and every car is sold with a 3 year waiting list. Id be more than happy to keep all you boys happy and have Ferrair pull out of F1-but a massive amount of peeps would not watch, and Bernie knows this and thats why the Scuderia get away with things like extra testing and thats why they have so much pull with Bernie, cause he knows how much ferrari means to F1 and his wallet.

And until a Macca driver or Renault driver wins 5 champoinships in one of these cars no one has a leg to stand on in any argument :P

Have a think for a little while. Ferrari (Well, let's be honest - FIAT) need F1 to generate the revenues. Do you really think that CART racing or Indy racing would allow them to bring in the hundreds of millions of dollars in sponsorship etc?

For the record McLaren won in 84, 85, 86, 88, 89, 90, 91. With three different drivers. All allowed to fight each other - just think how bad the '88 season would have been if Senna hadn't been at war with Prost - they won 15 of 16 races between them. Would have won at Imola too, except for the Williams crashing into them.

You mean the race at Jerez when Schumacher tried to punt Villeneuve off the road in order to win the world championship?

I think the point to be made here is that the championship had been decided. Coulthard was rightly pissed off & fair enough. Doesn't mean there was a greater conspiracy at hand.

from recolection, i remember an article saying that DC and Mika knew that the had the race won becuase of their overwhelming quali speed. The two of them made a gentlemans agreement that whoever got round the first corner and took the lead would be able to win the race...

im not saying that exactly what happened, i just remember reading that in a Mika Hakkinen article somewhere not too long ago

And so it was that Mika Hakkinen won his first Grand Prix. Thanks to Jacques Villeneuve and in no small part to David Coulthard as well, because David had let Mika get ahead with three laps to go - probably on orders from the pits. The team did not bother to give details of this but David was not bubbling with joy after the event... Hakkinen himself was speechless and made little sense after the race.

Sorry, you wont convince me that Mika wasnt a protected species at McLaren, and DC should have been screaming blue murder. Hell up to that point of letting Mika past in two GPs in a row, it was DC who had been winning races for them. :rofl:

What do you thinlk would have happened if DC had a fuel rig jam in the nozzle nad cause long stop. In which time Mika got by, i know the pit wall would not have sent out the call for Mika to let DC resume the lead. :P Mika was lucky DC was his team mate for so many years, as DC was too much a gentlemen

It was a pretty poorly kept secret that Mika was the favoured drive at Mclaren. Newly spent more time in Mika's garage on race days. Ron and Mika were bum chums. Put personally I feel that DC peaked at Williams and his first year at Williams. After that he kinda dropped of pace.

Back when Senna and Prost were team-mates, even the Honda engineers favoured Senna. I read an interview with Prost years later and he said that he had some quiet words with the head of Honda motorsport at the time and they openly admitted that Senna was seen as a "son" because Honda saw him as a natural talent. Honda engineers didn't particularly like Prost's telling them what to do. Hence the year later Prost left Mclaren.

Have a think for a little while. Ferrari (Well, let's be honest - FIAT) need F1 to generate the revenues. Do you really think that CART racing or Indy racing would allow them to bring in the hundreds of millions of dollars in sponsorship etc?

For the record McLaren won in 84, 85, 86, 88, 89, 90, 91. With three different drivers. All allowed to fight each other - just think how bad the '88 season would have been if Senna hadn't been at war with Prost - they won 15 of 16 races between them. Would have won at Imola too, except for the Williams crashing into them.

lets have a think how many F1 races did McLaren win in the 50's, early 60's oh thats right they were not even in F1 yet

Yeah 88 was a great year-especially with that amazing non McLaren engine in the back

Lets have another think how many races McLaren won with their own engine in the car???.......ah thats right the 'mighty engineering genious' Mclaren dont have their ownb engine-they go to Ilmor for them(no come backs about who owns what-its not called a McLaren engine, its a Merc)

Edited by gtr660hp

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The car/ECU will have all the sensor that it needs and expect to have. I think i do not have to explain to you how the Link is way better specialy if you have swapped engine   I just do not want to deal with any "problems" cuz i have only Nistune which i learned is not that great and in my case cant even deal with that speed problem (Link can) And of course it will be way more easier to tune and diagnose and safe. And for the ECU/speed problem...i dont know.
    • Per Mark Roberts of Sonictune: Mark Robert Author At this time, no. No ETA either 2016-17 models. You will be able to purchase and install a 2018.5+ TCU though   TCU purchasing and pricing info! As we near the release of TCU tuning, I am going to answer some questions I get asked often.   What do I need for TCU tuning? At this time, you will need a 2018.5+ TCU to be able to tune. If you have a 2016-to early 2018, you will need to replace your TCU with the newer version. One good way to know if your TCU is good is if you have auto upshift in manual mode in 1st gear around 6500 rpms. If your manual 1st gear goes to 7k rpm and will hit the rev limiter unless you shift, you have the older TCU.   Why do I need to buy another ecu license/phone flash if I already have it on my ECU tune? The TCU is its own computer module. It is completely separate from the ECU. Because of this, you will be required to purchase a TCU license and, if your tuner has it, the phone flash license required to tune it via phone/bluetooth.   Do I need TCU tuning? TCU tuning is NOT required. However, the faster your setup, the more it will assist in track and dragy time consistency.   If I’m ECU tuned by (tuner A) can I get my TCU tuned by (Tuner ? Yes, since it’s a different module and a completely separate flash, you can have two different tuners. However, it is highly recommend that you have both tuned by the same tuner. For me, my TCU tuning will directly complement my ECU tuning style and features and running my ECU and another TCU or vice versa MIGHT cause some issues. At this time and for the foreseeable future, I will only be tuning my current ECU tuned customers TCUs.     I have a SYVECS AWD controller. Do I still need it? Yes! The AWD controllers main job is to control your AWD system. However, with TCU tuning, you will no longer need the auto-shift function as that will be done through the TCU. The AWD controller will still be very beneficial for racers looking to maximize traction on the launch.     Shift schedule changes: holding gears longer at lower pedal input as well as max shift rpm changes. Please note, the new ECU race rom coming out will address 90% of the shitty drivability issues these cars have through custom maps from myself and Racebox—as well as others I am sure.   Increase shift speeds: as seen in the videos I’ve been posting, the TCU shifts much faster once tuned.   Increased shift pressures: as also seen in the videos, much firmer full throttle shifts.      
    • Per Mark Roberts of Sonictune:     Mark Robert Author At this time, no. No ETA either 2016-17 models. You will be able to purchase and install a 2018.5+ TCU though   TCU purchasing and pricing info! As we near the release of TCU tuning, I am going to answer some questions I get asked often.   What do I need for TCU tuning? At this time, you will need a 2018.5+ TCU to be able to tune. If you have a 2016-to early 2018, you will need to replace your TCU with the newer version. One good way to know if your TCU is good is if you have auto upshift in manual mode in 1st gear around 6500 rpms. If your manual 1st gear goes to 7k rpm and will hit the rev limiter unless you shift, you have the older TCU.   Why do I need to buy another ecu license/phone flash if I already have it on my ECU tune? The TCU is its own computer module. It is completely separate from the ECU. Because of this, you will be required to purchase a TCU license and, if your tuner has it, the phone flash license required to tune it via phone/bluetooth.   Do I need TCU tuning? TCU tuning is NOT required. However, the faster your setup, the more it will assist in track and dragy time consistency.   If I’m ECU tuned by (tuner A) can I get my TCU tuned by (Tuner ? Yes, since it’s a different module and a completely separate flash, you can have two different tuners. However, it is highly recommend that you have both tuned by the same tuner. For me, my TCU tuning will directly complement my ECU tuning style and features and running my ECU and another TCU or vice versa MIGHT cause some issues. At this time and for the foreseeable future, I will only be tuning my current ECU tuned customers TCUs.     I have a SYVECS AWD controller. Do I still need it? Yes! The AWD controllers main job is to control your AWD system. However, with TCU tuning, you will no longer need the auto-shift function as that will be done through the TCU. The AWD controller will still be very beneficial for racers looking to maximize traction on the launch.     Shift schedule changes: holding gears longer at lower pedal input as well as max shift rpm changes. Please note, the new ECU race rom coming out will address 90% of the shitty drivability issues these cars have through custom maps from myself and Racebox—as well as others I am sure.   Increase shift speeds: as seen in the videos I’ve been posting, the TCU shifts much faster once tuned.   Increased shift pressures: as also seen in the videos, much firmer full throttle shifts.      
    • The fancy pants red shock tower brace is finally incoming from MX5 Mania, getting it shipped from 'Merica has been a long and problematic process, and GWR, the 'Merican supplier will not ship directly to consumers outside of the US, Mania basically had to order a heap of them, the colour choice was silver, or red, and we all know anything red adds 5 killerwasps of dynotorques..... Whilst it does fit over a 2.5, and I've seen a few photos and videos of it being installed and fitting, google also says it might get real close to the FAB9 intake front runner, people in the US says it does fit with the FAB9 intake, except for one person who said it slightly touched.......so there is that.....LOL..... As it seems that I am the first in AU to have this combination of parts there's no local knowledge about fitment, so I'm just a willing guinea pig in this endeavour, I'll cross my fingers and toes and hope for the best In other news, I ordered stuff from China  on the same day I ordered the 23° silicone bend from Victoria, the stuff from China arrived a day ago, the 23° silicone bend is still travelling around Australia thanks to Australia Post, and "may" be here next week
    • Very good news...I contacted Racebox about it last night. My car is a 2016 so remains to be seen if it is compatible, requires a TCU swap, or is impossible.
×
×
  • Create New...