Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm thinking the twin 3037s will be a bit of a goer with the .74 exhaust housing.

"We're looking to make 450awkw with out too much boost yet trying to have as little lag as possible."

a turbo capable of making 300kw at the rubber (or more) on its own, isnt the best choice for 450kw if you want response

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I'm glad its not my money ! From other peoples hearsay the TO4Z would be a straightforward single solution and far cheaper than twin turbos - particularly twin HKS's .

If you want more or don't like TO4 P trim turbines there are a couple of alternatives in the US , firstly the GT3567R From Full Race.com and secondly the 4067R from I think Precision Turbo .

The GT3567R is basically a GT35R with the same compressor (TO4R 84mm 63T) as the TO4R/Z turbos .

The GT4067R is a GT40R with the same compressor as the one above . It also uses the large TO4 flange as can the TO4R/Z .

I think either of these would be more responsive than a GT35R with either the 94mm or 102mm compressors from the GT42R/T51R KAI/SPL . If an 84mm big trim compressor can push the air you want why chase a larger 94 or 102mm one ?

Actually just had a sticky at the maps - a GT35R might just about get there depending on turbine housing a/r and drive line losses , the 3567R should romp it in .

Cheers A .

You will be very lucky to get more than 410rwkw out of the .82

housing Gt35r, the 1.06 woudn't make to much more,

So To4Z or 94mm exducer Gt42., unless you use something from Precision inbetween

Judging by what they say in the US, the twin 2835 kit sounds laggy for the power it

makes.

cheers

darren

Fair enough , the map I was looking at shows ~ 62lbs airflow at ~ 23.5lbs boost . Output would vary with different engines , tuning , state of tune .

The 7/14 blade GT40's 88mm compressor map shows about 68lbs flow and the word is that the 84mm TO4R does 75lbs of flow . My preferences only , 88 GT40 more blades than is good for response and turbine efficiency + requires huge comp cover , 84mm TO4R wheel pumps more air and can use more compact comp cover - AND 6/12 blades good for reasons already mentioned . Everyone that uses TO4Z's (same comp) can't sing enough praise for its compressor and its non surging characteristics .

Cheers A .

I'll just straighten the whole Hypertune scene out.

Hypertune used to share the same facility as BD4's, they were never the same company. BD4's never worked on any of Hypertunes cars, where as Hypertune did a lot of work on BD4's cars.

As for Hypertune i get a lot of work performed by the guys down there at Taren point.

They produce all of their own gear using CNC mills and CNC mandrel benders.

I'm sure they won't mind if you go round to their factory to see what they do.

As for 3037's being a bit laggy has anyone got experience with these turbos?

any help would be great.

Cheers

since you seem to have missed the point of a lot of people

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...c=34855&hl=3037

If ONE 3037 can crank over 300rwkw (just one thread of many above as the example)

Then TWO would get you into the 550-650rwkw mark.

You goal is 450rwkw, get better matched single.

You asked for response, do you really want response?

If you did you wouldnt be thinking two monster twins.

I agree, if you want ultimate response, go the big single with moderate cams. Then again, more info is required on your engine specs: capacity, cams, etc

2835's are not as responsive as say 2530's or a GT35 or TO4R/Z unless you have a 2.8L or RB30, and even then they will still have a significant amount of lag. With the 3037S's they will only be laggier and less responsive.

Disco's suggestions sound very tempting also as improved response can be had with minimal power sacrifices.

You could make things simpler by going for GTRS's.

When people talk single 3037s they normally have a large housing like WRX i know wich has a 1.12 ex housing

where as for a street GTR we would run twin .74. i don't want to run big boost either that why i want a slightly larger turbo.

I'm looking a t running about 15-20psi.

You wouldn't be running any more than 20 psi on pump fuel on the street anyway. The most used housing on a single 3037s would be the 0.87 for the street anyway. 1.12 would be laggier for a street car. Twin 3037S's will make 450awkw quite easily on 20 psi.

However, similar power can be made using a single T04Z. :rolleyes:

Question is, how much response do you want to sacrifice?

Can't really believe this hasn't been asked

what will the car be used for?

Dyno/boasting/something to talk about

Drag

Track

Street

as the midrange you'll get from the big twins at low boost 20psi compared to smaller say low mounts or single turbo such as t04z at the same boost will easily make them faster then the big twins that aren't running efficiently

Its normal use is just for driving to work and so on.

but for us to make 367kw we have to run 27psi

i know the turbos will have more lag but as someone else said

20psi on those turbos should make around 450kw.

Have you seen this thread?: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...opic=93880&st=0

Plenty of different RB26 cobinations and their respective graphs.

If you are going to use this car for normal everyday use, why do you want 450awkw on 20 psi with minimal lag, especially using a high mount twin set up? It doesn't sound like you want it for drag or racing use, unless you plan on taking it for a blast every now and then. But you have specified very high power with quite stringent parameters. For an every day street car, 450awkw is lethal. I dont think that it is achievable unless you term "minimal lag" as being 5K+ as you won't see much boost below that with twin high mounts (3037S's).

It will also cost you almost twice as much to achieve it with a twin set up than a single.

I know lag is a big thing, but if power hits at 5000rpm thats fine beause we will be reving it out to 9000rpm

The guys down at Hypertune will be performing all the work on the car,

They have been in cars with these turbos, and asure me with the right tune make 800hp no worries.

450rwkw is not 850hp

Do you want 450rwkw or 850hp?

If your rev'ing the guts to 9000rpm, then i'd say drop back 1000rpm and use boost.

IF you've got a motor to handle big revs, it'll handle a mild amount of boost

If you decide to use HKS's GT3037's I'd give serious thought to using the 52 compressor trim version (cartridge no 700177-0006) . They work out to be a better balance of compressor load to turbine power and if the SR boys can get nearly 400 Hp out of them in single form its more than you probably need in twin form . Also from memory HKS did a 48 compressor trim version but I don't think anyones ever seen one . HKS do T28 flanged housings for them in .61 and .73 a/r as well so my guess would be .73's .

It still seems a lot of turbo for the 600 odd Hp , what do twin 2530's get you if the manifolds and turbine housings are cleaned up and good dumps and cams are used ? Would be a lot cheaper and use a bit more of what you already own if its enough .

Also glad its not me paying for the driveline to support it ...

Cheers A .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...